Connection

Susan Harvey to Female

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Susan Harvey has written about Female.
Susan Harvey
Connection Strength
0.988
Female
  1. Outcomes of Foci on Breast MRI: Features Associated With Malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 10; 215(4):1012-1019.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  2. Improving State-Mandated Breast Density Notifications. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Mar; 17(3):384-390.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  3. Deep-Learning-Based Semantic Labeling for 2D Mammography and Comparison of Complexity for Machine Learning Tasks. J Digit Imaging. 2019 08; 32(4):565-570.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  4. Ultrasound for Breast Cancer Detection Globally: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Glob Oncol. 2019 08; 5:1-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  5. Improving Patient Comprehension of Screening Mammography Recall Lay Letters. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Dec; 16(12):1669-1676.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  6. A Pilot of Data-Driven Modeling to Assess Potential for Improved Efficiency in an Academic Breast-Imaging Center. J Digit Imaging. 2019 04; 32(2):221-227.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  7. The Importance of Understanding Breast Cancer in Pregnancy. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 06; 28(6):737-738.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  8. Factors Impacting False Positive Recall in Screening Mammography. Acad Radiol. 2019 11; 26(11):1505-1512.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  9. Review of axillary web syndrome: What the radiologist should know. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Apr; 113:66-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  10. Changes in Final BI-RADS Assessment Categories and Clinical Outcome Metrics When Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Is Included in Diagnostic Mammography. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 May; 16(5):728-732.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  11. Variability in Individual Radiologist BI-RADS 3 Usage at a Large Academic Center: What's the Cause and What Should We Do About It? Acad Radiol. 2019 07; 26(7):915-922.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  12. Impact of insurance coverage and socioeconomic factors on screening mammography patients' selection of digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography. Breast J. 2018 11; 24(6):1091-1093.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  13. A Review of Options for Localization of Axillary Lymph Nodes in the Treatment of Invasive Breast Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2019 06; 26(6):805-819.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  14. Assessment and Improvement Strategies for a Breast Cancer Early Detection Program in Rural South Africa. J Glob Oncol. 2018 07; 4:1-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  15. Strategies for Decreasing Screening Mammography Recall Rates While Maintaining Performance Metrics. Acad Radiol. 2017 12; 24(12):1556-1560.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  16. Nationwide cross-sectional adherence to mammography screening guidelines: national behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey results. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Aug; 164(3):719-725.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  17. An Abbreviated Protocol for High-risk Screening Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Impact on Performance Metrics and BI-RADS Assessment. Acad Radiol. 2017 09; 24(9):1132-1138.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  18. An Abbreviated Protocol for High-Risk Screening Breast MRI Saves Time and Resources. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R74-R80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  19. Comparative effectiveness of breast MRI and mammography in screening young women with elevated risk of developing breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 08; 158(3):583-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  20. An Abbreviated Protocol for High-Risk Screening Breast MRI Saves Time and Resources. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Apr; 13(4):374-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  21. Listening to Women: Expectations and Experiences in Breast Imaging. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Sep; 24(9):777-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  22. Does a Picture Make a Difference? Ultrasound Guidance in the Management of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20; 33(30):3367-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  23. Incidental lung cancer found on screening breast MRI with eventual lymphatic metastasis to the breast. Breast Dis. 2015; 35(3):207-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  24. The charge and the challenges of breast cancer screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Sep; 23 Suppl 1:S1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  25. Understanding patient options, utilization patterns, and burdens associated with breast cancer screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Sep; 23 Suppl 1:S3-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  26. The use of additional imaging increased specificity and decreased sensitivity in screening mammography. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Sep; 58(9):942-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  27. Increase in cancer detection and recall rates with independent double interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 May; 180(5):1461-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  28. DeepCAT: Deep Computer-Aided Triage of Screening Mammography. J Digit Imaging. 2021 02; 34(1):27-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  29. Benefits of digital breast tomosynthesis: A lesion-level analysis. J Med Screen. 2021 09; 28(3):311-317.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  30. Impact of Improved Screening Mammography Recall Lay Letter Readability on Patient Follow-Up. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Nov; 17(11):1429-1436.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  31. Analysis of Breast Cancer Patients with T1-2 Tumors and 1-3 Positive Lymph Nodes Treated with or without Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy. Sci Rep. 2020 06 18; 10(1):9887.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  32. Impact of Telephone Communication on Patient Adherence With Follow-Up Recommendations After an Abnormal Screening Mammogram. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Sep; 17(9):1139-1148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  33. Multiparametric deep learning tissue signatures for a radiological biomarker of breast cancer: Preliminary results. Med Phys. 2020 Jan; 47(1):75-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  34. Breast MRI BI-RADS 3: Impact of Patient-Level Factors on Compliance With Short-Term Follow-Up. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Mar; 17(3):377-383.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  35. DNA Methylation Markers for Breast Cancer Detection in the Developing World. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 11 01; 25(21):6357-6367.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  36. Validation of a low-cost, carbon dioxide-based cryoablation system for percutaneous tumor ablation. PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0207107.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  37. Robust Short-Lag Spatial Coherence Imaging of Breast Ultrasound Data: Initial Clinical Results. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2019 03; 66(3):527-540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  38. Digital breast tomosynthesis: Image acquisition principles and artifacts. Clin Imaging. 2019 May - Jun; 55:188-195.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  39. Characteristics and Outcomes of BI-RADS 3 Lesions on Breast MRI. Clin Breast Cancer. 2019 02; 19(1):e152-e159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  40. Synthesized Mammography: The New Standard of Care When Screening for Breast Cancer with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis? Acad Radiol. 2018 08; 25(8):973-976.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  41. Communication in Breast Imaging: Lessons Learned at Diagnostic Evaluation. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 05; 14(5):665-667.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  42. Adjuvant radiation use in older women with early-stage breast cancer at Johns Hopkins. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 11; 160(2):291-296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  43. Impact of Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organizations at Screening Mammography: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Radiology. 2017 Feb; 282(2):437-448.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  44. Invasive Breast Cancer Preferably and Predominantly Occurs at the Interface Between Fibroglandular and Adipose Tissue. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 02; 17(1):e11-e18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  45. Systematic review of 3D mammography for breast cancer screening. Breast. 2016 Jun; 27:52-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  46. Neoadjuvant Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Current Practice, Controversies, and Future Directions. Oncology (Williston Park). 2015 Nov; 29(11):828-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  47. Superior vena cava compression during posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 01; 91(3):696-700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.