Connection

David Hoel to Neoplasms

This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Hoel has written about Neoplasms.
Connection Strength

0.710
  1. Health among commercial airline pilots. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2001 Sep; 72(9):821-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  2. Decreasing cardiovascular disease and increasing cancer among whites in the United States from 1973 through 1987. Good news and bad news. JAMA. 1994 Feb 09; 271(6):431-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  3. Influence of death certificate errors on cancer mortality trends. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Jul 07; 85(13):1063-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  4. Agricultural exposures and cancer trends in developed countries. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Apr; 100:39-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  5. Omeprazole, cytochrome P450, and chemical carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 1992 May; 102(5):1823-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  6. Trends in cancer mortality in 15 industrialized countries, 1969-1986. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992 Mar 04; 84(5):313-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  7. Perspective and overview of the concepts and value of hazard identification as the initial phase of risk assessment for cancer and human health. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1992; 18 Suppl 1:83-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  8. Figuring out cancer. Int J Health Serv. 1992; 22(3):447-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  9. Trends in cancer mortality in industrial countries. Introduction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990; 609:ix-xi.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  10. Altitude, radiation, and mortality from cancer and heart disease. Radiat Res. 1987 Nov; 112(2):381-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  11. Toxicity and carcinogenic potency. Risk Anal. 1985 Dec; 5(4):263-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  12. Epidemiology and the inference of cancer mechanisms. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1985 May; 67:199-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  13. Design of animal carcinogenicity studies for goodness-of-fit of multistage models. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1984 Dec; 4(6):949-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  14. Implication of nonlinear kinetics on risk estimation in carcinogenesis. Science. 1983 Mar 04; 219(4588):1032-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  15. Statistical measures of risk. Drug Metab Rev. 1982; 13(5):829-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  16. Animal experimentation and its relevance to man. Environ Health Perspect. 1979 Oct; 32:25-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  17. Unexplained increases in cancer incidence in the United States from 1975 to 1994: possible sentinel health indicators? Annu Rev Public Health. 1999; 20:173-209.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  18. International trends in cancer mortality in France, West Germany, Italy, Japan, England and Wales, and the USA. Lancet. 1990 Aug 25; 336(8713):474-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  19. Review and evaluation of updated research on the health effects associated with low-dose ionising radiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Jul; 140(2):103-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  20. Biologically based models for risk assessment. IARC Sci Publ. 1990; (104):20-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  21. International trends in cancer mortality in France, West Germany, Italy, Japan, England and Wales, and the United States. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990; 609:5-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  22. Trichloroethylene risk assessment: a review and commentary. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2009; 39(9):782-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  23. WHI: Now that the dust has settled: a commentary. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep; 189(3):621-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  24. Association between chloroform levels in finished drinking water supplies and various site-specific cancer mortality rates. J Environ Pathol Toxicol. 1979 Jan-Feb; 2(3):873-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  25. Fundamental carcinogenic processes and their implications for low dose risk assessment. Cancer Res. 1976 Sep; 36(9 pt.1):2973-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.