Connection

Jane Joseph to Pattern Recognition, Visual

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jane Joseph has written about Pattern Recognition, Visual.
Jane Joseph
Connection Strength
3.438
Pattern Recognition, Visual
  1. The changing landscape of functional brain networks for face processing in typical development. Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 15; 63(3):1223-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.393
  2. Progressive and regressive developmental changes in neural substrates for face processing: testing specific predictions of the Interactive Specialization account. Dev Sci. 2011 Mar; 14(2):227-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.355
  3. Part perception in infancy: sensitivity to the short-cut rule. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May; 72(4):1070-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.335
  4. Mid-fusiform activation during object discrimination reflects the process of differentiating structural descriptions. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Sep; 20(9):1711-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.299
  5. Neural developmental changes in processing inverted faces. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006 Sep; 6(3):223-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.260
  6. fMRI correlates of cortical specialization and generalization for letter processing. Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 15; 32(2):806-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.256
  7. Infants' perception of information along object boundaries: concavities versus convexities. J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Jun; 94(2):91-113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.251
  8. Developmental shifts in cortical loci for face and object recognition. Neuroreport. 2004 Jul 19; 15(10):1549-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.225
  9. Shared and dissociated cortical regions for object and letter processing. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun; 17(1):56-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  10. Effects of structural similarity on neural substrates for object recognition. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Mar; 3(1):1-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  11. Natural and manufactured objects activate the fusiform face area. Neuroreport. 2002 May 24; 13(7):935-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.194
  12. Functional neuroimaging studies of category specificity in object recognition: a critical review and meta-analysis. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2001 Jun; 1(2):119-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.181
  13. Perceptual specialization and configural face processing in infancy. J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Nov; 116(3):625-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  14. The involvement of the inferior parietal cortex in the numerical Stroop effect and the distance effect in a two-digit number comparison task. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Sep; 18(9):1518-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  15. Cortical regions associated with different aspects of object recognition performance. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Sep; 4(3):364-78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  16. Hypothesis testing for selective, differential, and conjoined brain activation. J Neurosci Methods. 2002 Aug 30; 118(2):129-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.