Yuko Palesch to Research Design
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Yuko Palesch has written about Research Design.
Connection Strength
3.211
-
Treatment effect on ordinal functional outcome using piecewise multistate Markov model with unobservable baseline: an application to the modified Rankin scale. J Biopharm Stat. 2019; 29(1):82-97.
Score: 0.455
-
Some common misperceptions about P values. Stroke. 2014 Dec; 45(12):e244-6.
Score: 0.353
-
Continuous covariate imbalance and conditional power for clinical trial interim analyses. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 May; 38(1):9-18.
Score: 0.337
-
Quantitative comparison of randomization designs in sequential clinical trials based on treatment balance and allocation randomness. Pharm Stat. 2012 Jan-Feb; 11(1):39-48.
Score: 0.277
-
Design and analysis plans. Front Neurol Neurosci. 2009; 25:76-77.
Score: 0.239
-
Applying a phase II futility study design to therapeutic stroke trials. Stroke. 2005 Nov; 36(11):2410-4.
Score: 0.188
-
An efficient multi-stage, single-arm Phase II futility design for ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2004 Sep; 5 Suppl 1:55-6.
Score: 0.174
-
Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Research: Issues, Opportunities, and the National Institutes of Health StrokeNet. Stroke. 2017 03; 48(3):813-819.
Score: 0.103
-
Power of an Adaptive Trial Design for Endovascular Stroke Studies: Simulations Using IMS (Interventional Management of Stroke) III Data. Stroke. 2016 12; 47(12):2931-2937.
Score: 0.102
-
Multi-modality neuro-monitoring: conventional clinical trial design. Neurocrit Care. 2015 Jun; 22(3):369-77.
Score: 0.092
-
Challenges of decision making regarding futility in a randomized trial: the Interventional Management of Stroke III experience. Stroke. 2014 May; 45(5):1408-14.
Score: 0.085
-
High dose deferoxamine in intracerebral hemorrhage (HI-DEF) trial: rationale, design, and methods. Neurocrit Care. 2013 Oct; 19(2):257-66.
Score: 0.082
-
Platelet-oriented inhibition in new TIA and minor ischemic stroke (POINT) trial: rationale and design. Int J Stroke. 2013 Aug; 8(6):479-83.
Score: 0.081
-
Covariate imbalance and adjustment for logistic regression analysis of clinical trial data. J Biopharm Stat. 2013; 23(6):1383-402.
Score: 0.078
-
Impact of safety monitoring on error probabilities of binary efficacy outcome analyses in large phase III group sequential trials. Pharm Stat. 2012 Jul-Aug; 11(4):310-7.
Score: 0.074
-
Clinical trial design in the neurocritical care unit. Neurocrit Care. 2012 Feb; 16(1):6-19.
Score: 0.073
-
Flexible analytical methods for adding a treatment arm mid-study to an ongoing clinical trial. J Biopharm Stat. 2012; 22(4):758-72.
Score: 0.072
-
[Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH)-II at Japan site: study design and advance construction of domestic research network]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2012; 52(9):642-50.
Score: 0.072
-
The albumin in acute stroke trial (ALIAS); design and methodology. Int J Stroke. 2007 Aug; 2(3):214-9.
Score: 0.053
-
Lessons from adult stroke trials. Pediatr Neurol. 2006 Jun; 34(6):446-9.
Score: 0.049
-
Analysis of clustered matched-pair data for a non-inferiority study design. Stat Med. 2003 Jan 30; 22(2):279-90.
Score: 0.039
-
Assessment of the End Point Adjudication Process on the Results of the Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) Trial: A Secondary Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 09 04; 2(9):e1910769.
Score: 0.031
-
The National Institutes of Health StrokeNet: A User's Guide. Stroke. 2016 Feb; 47(2):301-3.
Score: 0.024
-
Evolution of practice during the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial and implications for ongoing trials. Stroke. 2014 Dec; 45(12):3606-11.
Score: 0.022
-
An overview of the adaptive designs accelerating promising trials into treatments (ADAPT-IT) project. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Oct; 60(4):451-7.
Score: 0.018
-
The ALIAS (ALbumin In Acute Stroke) Phase III randomized multicentre clinical trial: design and progress report. Biochem Soc Trans. 2006 Dec; 34(Pt 6):1323-6.
Score: 0.013
-
Optimizing the ongoing search for new treatments for Parkinson disease: using futility designs. Neurology. 2006 Mar 14; 66(5):628-33.
Score: 0.012
-
Non-linearity of Parkinson's disease progression: implications for sample size calculations in clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2005; 2(6):509-18.
Score: 0.011