Eric Powers to Coronary Stenosis
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Eric Powers has written about Coronary Stenosis.
Connection Strength
0.714
-
Comparison between angiography and fractional flow reserve versus single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging for determining lesion significance in patients with multivessel coronary disease. Am J Cardiol. 2007 Apr 01; 99(7):896-902.
Score: 0.228
-
Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft aneurysm causing high-gradient right ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan; 16(1):117.
Score: 0.096
-
Comparison of lipid deposition at coronary bifurcations versus at nonbifurcation portions of coronary arteries as determined by near-infrared spectroscopy. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Aug 01; 112(3):369-72.
Score: 0.088
-
High left ventricular mass index does not limit the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of lesion severity. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006 Nov; 18(11):544-9.
Score: 0.056
-
Outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes and moderate coronary lesions undergoing deferral of revascularization based on fractional flow reserve assessment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Oct; 68(4):544-8.
Score: 0.056
-
Prevalence of unfavorable angiographic characteristics for percutaneous intervention in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Sep; 68(3):357-62.
Score: 0.055
-
Coronary flow reserve abnormalities in patients with diabetes mellitus who have end-stage renal disease and normal epicardial coronary arteries. Am Heart J. 2004 Jun; 147(6):1017-23.
Score: 0.047
-
Effect of acute myocardial infarction on the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of the severity of coronary artery narrowing. Am J Cardiol. 2004 May 01; 93(9):1102-6.
Score: 0.047
-
Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Aug 01; 90(3):210-5.
Score: 0.042