Walter Renne to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Walter Renne has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
0.380
-
Aerosol and spatter mitigation in dentistry: Analysis of the effectiveness of 13 setups. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 04; 33(3):466-479.
Score: 0.028
-
Marginal and internal fit of full ceramic crowns milled using CADCAM systems on cadaver full arch scans. BMC Oral Health. 2020 07 06; 20(1):189.
Score: 0.027
-
The digital denture replication method (DRM): a simplified method to fabricate a complete removable prosthesis. Quintessence Int. 2020; 51(10):838-843.
Score: 0.026
-
Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 07; 31(4):369-377.
Score: 0.025
-
Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jan; 123(1):85-95.
Score: 0.025
-
A novel method for complex three-dimensional evaluation of intraoral scanner accuracy. Int J Comput Dent. 2019; 22(3):239-249.
Score: 0.024
-
A novel technique for reference point generation to aid in intraoral scan alignment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017 11 12; 29(6):391-395.
Score: 0.022
-
Evaluation of the Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Using Two Different Chairside CAD/CAM Systems on Preparations of Varying Quality. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015 Jul-Aug; 27(4):194-202.
Score: 0.019
-
Utilizing self-assessment software to evaluate student wax-ups in dental morphology. J Dent Educ. 2015 Jun; 79(6):697-704.
Score: 0.019
-
Chairside CAD/CAM technology: a positive "disruption" in dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2014 Feb; 35(2):126-7.
Score: 0.017
-
Commentary: influence of adhesive application methods and rebonding agent application on sealing effectiveness of all-in-one self-etching adhesives. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013 Oct; 25(5):344-5.
Score: 0.017
-
E4D compare software: an alternative to faculty grading in dental education. J Dent Educ. 2013 Feb; 77(2):168-75.
Score: 0.016
-
Predicting marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns based on the presence or absence of common preparation errors. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Nov; 108(5):310-5.
Score: 0.016
-
A simplified technique for restoring interproximal root surface lesions. Oper Dent. 2012 Mar-Apr; 37(2):211-5.
Score: 0.015
-
Chairside repair of worn or lost denture teeth using nanofilled composite resin bonded to the denture base. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Feb; 103(2):129-30.
Score: 0.013
-
Commentary: effect of bleaching on staining susceptibility of resin composite restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009; 21(6):415.
Score: 0.012
-
The effect of software updates on the trueness and precision of intraoral scanners. Quintessence Int. 2021 Jun 09; 52(7):636-644.
Score: 0.007
-
Evaluation of the accuracy of multiple digital impression systems on a fully edentulous maxilla. Quintessence Int. 2021 May 07; 52(6):488-495.
Score: 0.007
-
Evaluation of complete-arch implant scanning with 5 different intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and operator experience. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Oct; 128(4):632-638.
Score: 0.007
-
Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method. BMC Oral Health. 2020 04 07; 20(1):97.
Score: 0.007
-
Evaluation of the spatter-reduction effectiveness and aerosol containment of eight dry-field isolation techniques. Quintessence Int. 2020; 51(8):660-670.
Score: 0.007
-
Effect of scan substrates on accuracy of 7 intraoral digital impression systems using human maxilla model. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019 May; 22 Suppl 1:168-174.
Score: 0.006
-
Evaluation of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated using 3 different techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Oct; 122(4):390-395.
Score: 0.006
-
Anatomic Customization of Root-Analog Dental Implants With Cone-Beam CT and CAD/CAM Fabrication: A Cadaver-Based Pilot Evaluation. J Oral Implantol. 2018 Feb; 44(1):15-26.
Score: 0.006
-
Dental students' opinions of preparation assessment with E4D compare software versus traditional methods. J Dent Educ. 2014 Oct; 78(10):1424-31.
Score: 0.005