Connection

Joseph Romagnuolo to Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Joseph Romagnuolo has written about Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde.
Joseph Romagnuolo
Connection Strength
4.304
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
  1. Response to Alkhatib et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar; 109(3):448.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.365
  2. Double plastic stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction: preliminary evidence for a novel cost-effective alternative to metal stenting. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb; 109(2):295-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.363
  3. Predicting native papilla biliary cannulation success using a multinational Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Quality Network. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 10; 13:147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.355
  4. Recording ERCP fluoroscopy metrics using a multinational quality network: establishing benchmarks and examining time-related improvements. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug; 108(8):1224-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.350
  5. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jul; 70(1):80-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.259
  6. Allopurinol to prevent pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Apr; 6(4):465-71; quiz 371.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.241
  7. Postprocedural interpretation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography by radiology. Can J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan; 22(1):55-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.238
  8. Infection after ERCP, and antibiotic prophylaxis: a sequential quality-improvement approach over 11 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Mar; 67(3):471-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.237
  9. Noninvasive vs. selective invasive biliary imaging for acute biliary pancreatitis: an economic evaluation by using decision tree analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jan; 61(1):86-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  10. Rectal indomethacin alone versus indomethacin and prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for preventing pancreatitis after ERCP: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 03 03; 17(1):120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  11. Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction: Updates from the Recent Literature. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2015 Aug; 17(8):31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  12. Incidence and predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction undergoing biliary or dual sphincterotomy: results from the EPISOD prospective multicenter randomized sham-controlled study. Endoscopy. 2015 Oct; 47(10):884-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  13. Success of single-balloon enteroscopy in patients with surgically altered anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug; 82(2):319-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  14. Evaluation of Pharmacologic Prevention of Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Systematic Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jul; 13(7):1231-9; quiz e70-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  15. The risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and the protective effect of rectal indomethacin in cases of attempted but unsuccessful prophylactic pancreatic stent placement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan; 81(1):150-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  16. Can patient and pain characteristics predict manometric sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in patients with clinically suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction? Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 May; 79(5):765-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  17. Randomised clinical trial: MRCP-first vs. ERCP-first approach in patients with suspected biliary obstruction due to bile duct stones. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Nov; 38(9):1045-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  18. Does rectal indomethacin eliminate the need for prophylactic pancreatic stent placement in patients undergoing high-risk ERCP? Post hoc efficacy and cost-benefit analyses using prospective clinical trial data. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar; 108(3):410-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  19. The ERCP quality network: a pilot study of benchmarking practice and performance. Am J Med Qual. 2013 May-Jun; 28(3):256-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  20. A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 12; 366(15):1414-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  21. Feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation for decreasing post-ERCP pain: a randomized, sham-controlled, pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun; 73(6):1158-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  22. Challenges in planning and initiating a randomized clinical study of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Nov; 72(5):986-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  23. Chronic calcific pancreatitis: combination ERCP and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic duct stones. South Med J. 2010 Jun; 103(6):505-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  24. Long-term clinical outcomes after endoscopic minor papilla therapy in symptomatic patients with pancreas divisum. Pancreas. 2009 Nov; 38(8):903-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  25. Post-ERCP pancreatitis rates do not differ between needle-knife and pull-type pancreatic sphincterotomy techniques: a multiendoscopist 13-year experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jun; 69(7):1271-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  26. Canadian credentialing guidelines for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Can J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun; 22(6):547-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  27. Small prophylactic pancreatic duct stents: an assessment of spontaneous passage and stent-induced ductal abnormalities. Endoscopy. 2007 Dec; 39(12):1082-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  28. Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy for pancreas divisum by using a needle-knife or standard pull-type technique: safety and reintervention rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Nov; 64(5):705-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  29. Patterns of use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a Canadian province. Can J Gastroenterol. 2004 Oct; 18(10):619-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  30. Effect of Covered Metallic Stents Compared With Plastic Stents on Benign Biliary Stricture Resolution: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Mar 22-29; 315(12):1250-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  31. Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on pain-related disability following cholecystectomy: the EPISOD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 May; 311(20):2101-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  32. Recurrent and relapsing pancreatitis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011 Apr; 13(2):140-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  33. Low symptomatic premature stent occlusion of multiple plastic stents for benign biliary strictures: comparing standard and prolonged stent change intervals. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Sep; 72(3):558-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  34. Miss rate of pancreas divisum by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice. Pancreas. 2008 Aug; 37(2):151-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  35. Expandable metal biliary stenting in patients with recurrent premature polyethylene stent occlusion. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 May; 96(5):1435-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.