Connection

Richard Schmiedt to Action Potentials

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Richard Schmiedt has written about Action Potentials.
Connection Strength

0.563
  1. Chronic reduction of endocochlear potential reduces auditory nerve activity: further confirmation of an animal model of metabolic presbyacusis. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010 Sep; 11(3):419-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.303
  2. Topical application of mitomycin C to the middle ear is ototoxic in the gerbil. Otol Neurotol. 2006 Dec; 27(8):1186-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  3. Effects of chronic furosemide treatment and age on cell division in the adult gerbil inner ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003 Jun; 4(2):164-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  4. Evidence for Loss of Activity in Low-Spontaneous-Rate Auditory Nerve Fibers of Older Adults. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022 04; 23(2):273-284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  5. Development of cochlear potentials in the neonatal gerbil. Hear Res. 1995 Apr; 84(1-2):52-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  6. Rate/level functions of auditory-nerve fibers in young and quiet-aged gerbils. Hear Res. 1991 Jun; 53(2):217-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  7. Compound action potential input/output functions in young and quiet-aged gerbils. Hear Res. 1990 Dec; 50(1-2):163-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  8. Spontaneous rates, thresholds and tuning of auditory-nerve fibers in the gerbil: comparisons to cat data. Hear Res. 1989 Oct; 42(1):23-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  9. Boundaries of two-tone rate suppression of cochlear-nerve activity. Hear Res. 1982 Aug; 7(3):335-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  10. Low-frequency neural and cochlear-microphonic tuning curves in the gerbil. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Aug; 64(2):502-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  11. Age-related changes in cochleas of mongolian gerbils. Hear Res. 1991 Jul; 54(1):123-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.