U. Schoepf to Cost-Benefit Analysis
This is a "connection" page, showing publications U. Schoepf has written about Cost-Benefit Analysis.
Connection Strength
0.904
-
Design of CTP-PRO study (impact of stress Cardiac computed Tomography myocardial Perfusion on downstream resources and PROgnosis in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: A multicenter international study). Int J Cardiol. 2019 10 01; 292:253-257.
Score: 0.546
-
Evidence-base and cost-effectiveness of cardiothoracic imaging. J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Sep; 27(5):269-70.
Score: 0.085
-
Cardiac CT in the assessment of acute chest pain in the emergency department. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug; 193(2):397-409.
Score: 0.069
-
CT pulmonary angiography for acute pulmonary embolism: cost-effectiveness analysis and review of the literature. Semin Roentgenol. 2005 Jan; 40(1):20-4.
Score: 0.050
-
Assessing the value of coronary artery computed tomography as the first-line anatomical test for stable patients with indications for invasive angiography due to suspected coronary artery disease. Initial cost analysis in the CAT-CAD randomized trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Jan - Feb; 14(1):75-79.
Score: 0.034
-
Current and future applications of CT coronary calcium assessment. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Jun; 16(6):441-453.
Score: 0.032
-
Coronary computed tomographic angiography in clinical practice: state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Mar; 53(2):287-96.
Score: 0.025
-
Imaging evaluation of acute chest pain: systematic review of evidence base and cost-effectiveness. J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Sep; 27(5):289-95.
Score: 0.021
-
Diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism: systematic review of evidence base and cost-effectiveness of imaging tests. J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Sep; 27(5):304-14.
Score: 0.021
-
Cost-effectiveness of substituting dual-energy CT for SPECT in the assessment of myocardial perfusion for the workup of coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec; 81(12):3719-25.
Score: 0.019