U. Schoepf to Phantoms, Imaging
This is a "connection" page, showing publications U. Schoepf has written about Phantoms, Imaging.
Connection Strength
1.356
-
Contrast media injection protocol optimization for dual-energy coronary CT angiography: results from a circulation phantom. Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug; 28(8):3473-3481.
Score: 0.134
-
Optimizing Contrast Media Injection Protocols in Computed Tomography Angiography at Different Tube Voltages: Evaluation in a Circulation Phantom. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017 Sep/Oct; 41(5):804-810.
Score: 0.129
-
Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47.
Score: 0.114
-
Impact of an advanced image-based monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm on coronary stent visualization using third generation dual-source dual-energy CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2016 Jun; 26(6):1871-8.
Score: 0.113
-
CT Evaluation of Small-Diameter Coronary Artery Stents: Effect of an Integrated Circuit Detector with Iterative Reconstruction. Radiology. 2015 Sep; 276(3):706-14.
Score: 0.109
-
Image quality and radiation dose of low tube voltage 3rd generation dual-source coronary CT angiography in obese patients: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jul; 24(7):1643-50.
Score: 0.103
-
Accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography for the measurement of iodine concentration using cardiac CT protocols: validation in a phantom model. Eur Radiol. 2014 Feb; 24(2):512-8.
Score: 0.099
-
Radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: second-generation dual-source CT versus single-source 64-MDCT and first-generation dual-source CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 May; 196(5):W550-7.
Score: 0.083
-
Radiation dose at cardiac computed tomography: facts and fiction. J Thorac Imaging. 2010 Aug; 25(3):204-12.
Score: 0.079
-
Computing effective dose in cardiac CT. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jul 07; 55(13):3675-84.
Score: 0.078
-
In vitro evaluation of metallic coronary artery stents with 64-MDCT using an ECG-gated cardiac phantom: relationship between in-stent visualization, stent type, and heart rate. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Mar; 194(3):W256-62.
Score: 0.077
-
Ultra-high resolution photon-counting coronary CT angiography improves coronary stenosis quantification over a wide range of heart rates - A dynamic phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2023 Apr; 161:110746.
Score: 0.047
-
Stent imaging on a clinical dual-source photon-counting detector CT system-impact of luminal attenuation and sharp kernels on lumen visibility. Eur Radiol. 2023 Apr; 33(4):2469-2477.
Score: 0.046
-
Correction Factors for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Instead of Filtered Back Projection. Acad Radiol. 2016 12; 23(12):1480-1489.
Score: 0.030
-
Iterative image reconstruction techniques for CT coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison with traditional filtered back projection in vitro and in vivo. Radiology. 2014 Feb; 270(2):387-93.
Score: 0.025
-
CT coronary angiography: image quality with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction compared with filtered back-projection. Clin Radiol. 2013 Mar; 68(3):272-8.
Score: 0.023
-
Radiation-related cancer risks in a clinical patient population undergoing cardiac CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb; 196(2):W159-65.
Score: 0.020
-
Augmented reality visualization for CT-guided interventions: system description, feasibility, and initial evaluation in an abdominal phantom. Radiology. 2006 Jul; 240(1):230-5.
Score: 0.015
-
Advances in cardiac imaging with 16-section CT systems. Acad Radiol. 2003 Apr; 10(4):386-401.
Score: 0.012
-
Coronary artery calcium: absolute quantification in nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT studies. Radiology. 2002 May; 223(2):474-80.
Score: 0.011
-
Xenon versus ceramics: a comparison of two CT X-ray detector systems. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999 Sep-Oct; 23(5):795-9.
Score: 0.009