Connection

U. Schoepf to Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications U. Schoepf has written about Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques.
U. Schoepf
Connection Strength
2.197
Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques
  1. Conformational pulsatile changes of the aortic annulus: impact on prosthesis sizing by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep; 5(9):984-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.393
  2. [Coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering: high diagnostic accuracy with low radiation dose]. Radiologe. 2010 Jun; 50(6):500-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.336
  3. Coronary CT angiography: automatic cardiac-phase selection for image reconstruction. Eur Radiol. 2009 Aug; 19(8):1906-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.309
  4. Evaluation of a Deep Learning-Based Automated CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Algorithm. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 02; 13(2 Pt 1):524-526.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  5. Myocardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement: Accuracy of T1 Mapping-based Synthetic Inversion-Recovery Imaging. Radiology. 2016 Feb; 278(2):374-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  6. Predictive value of zero calcium score and low-end percentiles for the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis in stable patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Rofo. 2013 Aug; 185(8):726-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  7. CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction. Eur Radiol. 2013 Jan; 23(1):125-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  8. Isolated non-compaction of the left ventricle in a patient with new-onset heart failure: morphologic and functional evaluation with cardiac multidetector computed tomography. Korean J Radiol. 2012 Mar-Apr; 13(2):244-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  9. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar; 198(3):521-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  10. Low CT temporal sampling rates result in a substantial underestimation of myocardial blood flow measurements. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Mar; 35(3):539-547.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  11. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep - Oct; 11(5):354-359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  12. Prospectively ECG-Triggered Sequential Dual-Source Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Influence of Heart Rate on Image Quality and Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0134194.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  13. Absolute Versus Relative Myocardial Blood Flow by Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Anatomic Coronary Artery Disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul; 205(1):W67-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  14. Low-volume contrast medium protocol for comprehensive cardiac and aortoiliac CT assessment in the context of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Acad Radiol. 2015 Sep; 22(9):1138-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  15. Seventy-Peak Kilovoltage High-Pitch Thoracic Aortic CT Angiography without ECG Gating: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose. Acad Radiol. 2015 Jul; 22(7):890-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  16. Dual-source CT imaging to plan transcatheter aortic valve replacement: accuracy for diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2015 Apr; 275(1):80-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  17. ECG-synchronized CT angiography in 324 consecutive pediatric patients: spectrum of indications and trends in radiation dose. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015 Mar; 36(3):569-78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  18. Incremental value of pharmacological stress cardiac dual-energy CT over coronary CT angiography alone for the assessment of coronary artery disease in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jul; 203(1):W70-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  19. Closing in on the K edge: coronary CT angiography at 100, 80, and 70 kV-initial comparison of a second- versus a third-generation dual-source CT system. Radiology. 2014 Nov; 273(2):373-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  20. Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT: feasibility in a multicenter patient population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug; 203(2):W174-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  21. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography: comparison of filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction with different strengths. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014 Mar-Apr; 38(2):179-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  22. Prevalence and types of coronary to pulmonary artery fistula in a Chinese population at dual-source CT coronary angiography. Acta Radiol. 2014 Nov; 55(9):1031-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  23. Progression of arterial stiffness and coronary atherosclerosis: longitudinal evaluation by cardiac CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Apr; 200(4):798-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  24. CT coronary angiography: image quality with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction compared with filtered back-projection. Clin Radiol. 2013 Mar; 68(3):272-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  25. Incremental prognostic value of different components of coronary atherosclerotic plaque at cardiac CT angiography beyond coronary calcification in patients with acute chest pain. Radiology. 2012 Sep; 264(3):679-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  26. Interplatform reproducibility of CT coronary calcium scoring software. Radiology. 2012 Oct; 265(1):70-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.