Connection

U. Schoepf to Algorithms

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications U. Schoepf has written about Algorithms.
U. Schoepf
Connection Strength
4.663
Algorithms
  1. State-of-the-Art Pulmonary CT Angiography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar; 208(3):495-504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.354
  2. Fully automated derivation of coronary artery calcium scores and cardiovascular risk assessment from contrast medium-enhanced coronary CT angiography studies. Eur Radiol. 2013 Mar; 23(3):650-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.264
  3. High-temporal resolution dual-energy computed tomography of the heart using a novel hybrid image reconstruction algorithm: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011 Jan-Feb; 35(1):119-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.235
  4. Correlation of regional distribution and morphological pattern of calcification at CT coronary artery calcium scoring with non-calcified plaque formation and stenosis. Eur Radiol. 2010 Apr; 20(4):855-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.216
  5. Coronary CT angiography: automatic cardiac-phase selection for image reconstruction. Eur Radiol. 2009 Aug; 19(8):1906-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.207
  6. Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia-initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2008 Nov; 18(11):2414-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  7. Individualized coronary calcium scoring at any tube voltage using a kV-independent reconstruction algorithm. Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov; 30(11):5834-5840.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  8. Low-kV coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration using a kV-independent reconstruction algorithm. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 May - Jun; 14(3):246-250.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  9. Correlation of machine learning computed tomography-based fractional flow reserve with instantaneous wave free ratio to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Jun; 109(6):735-745.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  10. Deep learning to convert unstructured CT pulmonary angiography reports into structured reports. Eur Radiol Exp. 2019 09 23; 3(1):37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  11. Review of Clinical Applications for Virtual Monoenergetic Dual-Energy CT. Radiology. 2019 11; 293(2):260-271.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  12. CT FFR for Ischemia-Specific CAD With?a?New Computational Fluid Dynamics Algorithm: A Chinese Multicenter Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 04; 13(4):980-990.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  13. Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Machine Learning Algorithm versus Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling. Radiology. 2018 Jul; 288(1):64-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  14. Cinematic Rendering in CT: A Novel, Lifelike 3D Visualization Technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Aug; 209(2):370-379.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  15. A noise-optimized virtual monochromatic reconstruction algorithm improves stent visualization and diagnostic accuracy for detection of in-stent re-stenosis in lower extremity run-off CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec; 26(12):4380-4389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  16. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Angiography of the Lower Extremity Runoff: Impact of Noise-Optimized Virtual Monochromatic Imaging on Image Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy. Invest Radiol. 2016 Feb; 51(2):139-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  17. Effect of Automated Attenuation-based Tube Voltage Selection on Radiation Dose at CT: An Observational Study on a Global Scale. Radiology. 2016 Apr; 279(1):167-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  18. Impact of an advanced image-based monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm on coronary stent visualization using third generation dual-source dual-energy CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2016 Jun; 26(6):1871-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  19. State of the Art: Iterative CT Reconstruction Techniques. Radiology. 2015 Aug; 276(2):339-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  20. CT Evaluation of Small-Diameter Coronary Artery Stents: Effect of an Integrated Circuit Detector with Iterative Reconstruction. Radiology. 2015 Sep; 276(3):706-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  21. Computer-aided stenosis detection at coronary CT angiography: effect on performance of readers with different experience levels. Eur Radiol. 2015 Mar; 25(3):694-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  22. Reduced radiation dose and improved image quality at cardiovascular CT angiography by automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection: intra-individual comparison. Eur Radiol. 2014 Nov; 24(11):2677-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  23. Iterative image reconstruction techniques: cardiothoracic computed tomography applications. J Thorac Imaging. 2014 Jul; 29(4):198-208.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  24. Comparison of the effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection on cardiac CT postprocessing. Acad Radiol. 2014 Mar; 21(3):318-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  25. Iterative image reconstruction techniques for CT coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison with traditional filtered back projection in vitro and in vivo. Radiology. 2014 Feb; 270(2):387-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  26. Iterative reconstruction to preserve image quality and diagnostic accuracy at reduced radiation dose in coronary CT angiography: an intraindividual comparison. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Dec; 6(12):1239-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  27. Dual-energy CT lung ventilation/perfusion imaging for diagnosing pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol. 2013 Oct; 23(10):2666-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  28. Coronary CT angiography: comparison of a novel iterative reconstruction with filtered back projection for reconstruction of low-dose CT-Initial experience. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Feb; 82(2):275-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  29. Enhanced temporal resolution at cardiac CT with a novel CT image reconstruction algorithm: initial patient experience. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Feb; 82(2):270-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  30. Quantification of coronary artery calcium on the basis of dual-energy coronary CT angiography. Radiology. 2012 Sep; 264(3):700-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  31. Image quality and radiation dose of low dose coronary CT angiography in obese patients: sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov; 81(11):3141-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  32. Evaluation of plaques and stenosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010 Jul; 48(4):729-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  33. A personalized and optimal approach for dosing contrast material at coronary computed tomography angiography. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 2009:3521-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  34. Pulmonary embolism: computer-aided detection at multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Thorac Imaging. 2007 Nov; 22(4):319-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  35. Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy? Radiology. 2007 Jul; 244(1):121-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  36. 64 slice cardiovascular CT in the emergency department: concepts and first experiences. Radiol Med. 2006 Jun; 111(4):481-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  37. CT angiography for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: state of the art. Radiology. 2004 Feb; 230(2):329-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  38. Multidetector-row CT of the heart. Semin Roentgenol. 2003 Apr; 38(2):135-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  39. An Interpretable Chest CT Deep Learning Algorithm for Quantification of COVID-19 Lung Disease and Prediction of Inpatient Morbidity and Mortality. Acad Radiol. 2022 08; 29(8):1178-1188.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  40. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Based Calcium Scoring: In Vitro and In Vivo Validation of a Novel Virtual Noniodine Reconstruction Algorithm on a Clinical, First-Generation Dual-Source Photon Counting-Detector System. Invest Radiol. 2022 08 01; 57(8):536-543.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  41. Coronary artery calcium measurement: agreement of multirow detector and electron beam CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 May; 176(5):1295-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  42. A clinically applicable deep-learning model for detecting intracranial aneurysm in computed tomography angiography images. Nat Commun. 2020 11 30; 11(1):6090.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  43. Clinical applications of machine learning in cardiovascular disease and its relevance to cardiac imaging. Eur Heart J. 2019 06 21; 40(24):1975-1986.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  44. Automated plaque analysis for the prognostication of major adverse cardiac events. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jul; 116:76-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  45. Diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography for detection of lesion-specific ischemia: A multi-center study and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jul; 116:90-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  46. Modified calcium subtraction in dual-energy CT angiography of the lower extremity runoff: impact on diagnostic accuracy for stenosis detection. Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep; 29(9):4783-4793.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  47. A noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm improves the diagnostic accuracy of late hepatic arterial phase dual-energy CT for the detection of hypervascular liver lesions. Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug; 28(8):3393-3404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  48. Beam-hardening in 70-kV Coronary CT angiography: Artifact reduction using an advanced post-processing algorithm. Eur J Radiol. 2018 Apr; 101:111-117.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  49. Heavily Calcified Coronary Arteries: Advanced Calcium Subtraction Improves Luminal Visualization and Diagnostic Confidence in Dual-Energy Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. Invest Radiol. 2018 02; 53(2):103-109.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  50. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep - Oct; 11(5):354-359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  51. Coronary artery calcium in breast cancer survivors after radiation therapy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Sep; 33(9):1425-1431.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  52. CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration using iterative beam-hardening calcium correction reconstruction. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jun; 91:29-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  53. CT angiography for planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement using automated tube voltage selection: Image quality and radiation exposure. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan; 86:276-283.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  54. Radiation Dose Levels of Retrospectively ECG-Gated Coronary CT Angiography Using 70-kVp Tube Voltage in Patients with High or Irregular Heart Rates. Acad Radiol. 2017 01; 24(1):30-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  55. Correction Factors for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Instead of Filtered Back Projection. Acad Radiol. 2016 12; 23(12):1480-1489.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  56. Quantitative evaluation of beam-hardening artefact correction in dual-energy CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep; 26(9):3215-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  57. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  58. Clinical feasibility of a myocardial signal intensity threshold-based semi-automated cardiac magnetic resonance segmentation method. Eur Radiol. 2016 May; 26(5):1503-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  59. Dual-energy CT of the pancreas: improved carcinoma-to-pancreas contrast with a noise-optimized monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Nov; 84(11):2052-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  60. Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve measurements--initial experience with a novel physician-driven algorithm. Eur Radiol. 2015 Apr; 25(4):1201-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  61. Closing in on the K edge: coronary CT angiography at 100, 80, and 70 kV-initial comparison of a second- versus a third-generation dual-source CT system. Radiology. 2014 Nov; 273(2):373-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  62. CT in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Radiology. 2013 Dec; 269(3):650-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  63. Cardiovascular CT angiography in neonates and children: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction with iterative image reconstruction techniques. Eur Radiol. 2013 May; 23(5):1306-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  64. Radiation dose and image quality at high-pitch CT angiography of the aorta: intraindividual and interindividual comparisons with conventional CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Dec; 199(6):1402-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  65. CT coronary angiography: image quality with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction compared with filtered back-projection. Clin Radiol. 2013 Mar; 68(3):272-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  66. Diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism: systematic review of evidence base and cost-effectiveness of imaging tests. J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Sep; 27(5):304-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  67. Incremental prognostic value of different components of coronary atherosclerotic plaque at cardiac CT angiography beyond coronary calcification in patients with acute chest pain. Radiology. 2012 Sep; 264(3):679-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  68. Reproducibility of left and right ventricular mass measurements with cardiac CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Sep-Oct; 5(5):317-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  69. Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol. 2011 Oct; 21(10):2130-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  70. Iterative image reconstruction techniques: Applications for cardiac CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Jul-Aug; 5(4):225-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  71. Relationship between coronary artery disease and epicardial adipose tissue quantification at cardiac CT: comparison between automatic volumetric measurement and manual bidimensional estimation. Acad Radiol. 2010 Jun; 17(6):727-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  72. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial volume perfusion imaging with second generation dual-source computed tomography: Concepts and first experiences. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010 Mar-Apr; 4(2):127-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  73. Automated computer-aided stenosis detection at coronary CT angiography: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2010 May; 20(5):1160-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  74. Optimized image reconstruction for detection of deep venous thrombosis at multidetector-row CT venography. Eur Radiol. 2006 Feb; 16(2):269-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  75. CT measurement of coronary calcium mass: impact on global cardiac risk assessment. Eur Radiol. 2005 Jan; 15(1):96-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  76. Coronary artery calcium: absolute quantification in nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT studies. Radiology. 2002 May; 223(2):474-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  77. [Technical bases and acquisition conditions of electron-beam computed tomography]. Radiologe. 1998 Dec; 38(12):987-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.