Connection

U. Schoepf to Coronary Angiography

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications U. Schoepf has written about Coronary Angiography.
U. Schoepf
Connection Strength
34.624
Coronary Angiography
  1. Evaluation of a Tube Voltage-Tailored Contrast Medium Injection Protocol for Coronary CT Angiography: Results From the Prospective VOLCANIC Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 11; 215(5):1049-1056.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.476
  2. In-Hospital Cost Comparison of Triple-Rule-Out Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Acute Chest Pain. J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May; 35(3):198-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.463
  3. Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence Deep Learning Algorithm Implementing a Recurrent Neural Network With Long Short-term Memory for the Automated Detection of Calcified Plaques From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May; 35 Suppl 1:S49-S57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.463
  4. Contrast medium injection protocols for coronary CT angiography: should contrast medium volumes be tailored to body weight or body surface area? Clin Radiol. 2020 05; 75(5):395.e17-395.e24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.453
  5. Evaluation of a Deep Learning-Based Automated CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Algorithm. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 02; 13(2 Pt 1):524-526.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.448
  6. Influence of Coronary Calcium on Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning CT-FFR: Results From MACHINE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 03; 13(3):760-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  7. Relationship Between Pregnancy Complications and Subsequent Coronary Artery Disease Assessed by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Black Women. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 07; 12(7):e008754.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.438
  8. Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 May - Jun; 13(3):26-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.425
  9. Intermodel disagreement of myocardial blood flow estimation from dynamic CT perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jan; 110:175-180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.419
  10. Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Machine Learning Algorithm versus Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling. Radiology. 2018 Jul; 288(1):64-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.401
  11. Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve. Radiology. 2017 10; 285(1):17-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.387
  12. CT myocardial perfusion imaging: ready for prime time? Eur Radiol. 2018 Mar; 28(3):1253-1256.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.387
  13. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Therapeutic Decision Making. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15; 120(12):2121-2127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.386
  14. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Machine Learning for Risk Stratification of Non-Culprit Coronary Narrowings in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15; 120(8):1260-1266.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.382
  15. FFR-Derived From?Coronary CT?Angiography Using Workstation-Based Approaches. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 04; 10(4):497-498.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.374
  16. Cardiac CTA for Evaluation of Prosthetic?Valve?Dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 01; 10(1):91-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.364
  17. Correlation and predictive value of aortic root calcification markers with coronary artery calcification and obstructive coronary artery disease. Radiol Med. 2017 Feb; 122(2):113-120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.364
  18. Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived vs Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment: Meta-Analysis with Subgroup Evaluation of Intermediate Stenosis. Acad Radiol. 2016 11; 23(11):1402-1411.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.360
  19. Prognostic implications of coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Nov - Dec; 10(6):458-465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.357
  20. Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Sep-Oct; 10(5):377-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.355
  21. Myocardial perfusion imaging with dual energy CT. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct; 85(10):1914-1921.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.355
  22. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging identifies early perfusion abnormalities in diabetes and hypertension: Insights from a multicenter registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug; 10(4):301-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.352
  23. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 May-Jun; 10(3):199-206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.347
  24. Effect of reduced x-ray tube voltage, low iodine concentration contrast medium, and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: results of the prospective multicenter REALISE trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 May-Jun; 9(3):215-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.321
  25. Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: Assessment with Corrected Coronary Opacification Difference across Coronary Stents Measured with CT Angiography. Radiology. 2015 May; 275(2):403-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.319
  26. Computer-aided stenosis detection at coronary CT angiography: effect on performance of readers with different experience levels. Eur Radiol. 2015 Mar; 25(3):694-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.315
  27. Reply: the ethics of publishing dual exposure scans involving ionizing radiation when validated alternatives exist. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Sep; 7(9):964-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.313
  28. Coronary artery computed tomography scanning. Circulation. 2014 Mar 25; 129(12):1341-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.303
  29. Iterative reconstruction to preserve image quality and diagnostic accuracy at reduced radiation dose in coronary CT angiography: an intraindividual comparison. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Dec; 6(12):1239-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.294
  30. Detection of coronary artery stenosis with sub-milliSievert radiation dose by prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral CT angiography and iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol. 2013 Nov; 23(11):2927-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.288
  31. Influence of observer experience and training on proficiency in coronary CT angiography interpretation. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Aug; 82(8):1240-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.284
  32. Expert opinion: should coronary CT angiography be used as a screening test? J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Nov; 27(6):339.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.275
  33. Dual-energy CT of the heart. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov; 199(5 Suppl):S54-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.275
  34. Fully automated derivation of coronary artery calcium scores and cardiovascular risk assessment from contrast medium-enhanced coronary CT angiography studies. Eur Radiol. 2013 Mar; 23(3):650-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.273
  35. Independent association between obstructive sleep apnea and noncalcified coronary plaque demonstrated by noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography. Clin Cardiol. 2012 Oct; 35(10):641-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.272
  36. Coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with chronic chest pain: systematic review of evidence base and cost-effectiveness. J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Sep; 27(5):277-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.272
  37. Quantification of coronary artery calcium on the basis of dual-energy coronary CT angiography. Radiology. 2012 Sep; 264(3):700-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.270
  38. Impact of ventricular contrast medium attenuation on the accuracy of left and right ventricular function analysis at cardiac multi detector-row CT compared with cardiac MRI. Acad Radiol. 2012 Apr; 19(4):395-405.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.260
  39. Can non-calcified coronary artery plaques be detected on non-contrast CT calcium scoring studies? Acad Radiol. 2011 Jul; 18(7):858-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.251
  40. Radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: second-generation dual-source CT versus single-source 64-MDCT and first-generation dual-source CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 May; 196(5):W550-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  41. Cardiothoracic CT angiography: current contrast medium delivery strategies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Mar; 196(3):W260-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.245
  42. Integrative computed tomographic imaging of coronary artery disease. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2011 Jan; 9(1):27-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.242
  43. Intra-atrial course of the right coronary artery demonstrated at computed tomography coronary angiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2010 Nov; 25(4):W115-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.240
  44. Current contrast media delivery strategies for cardiac and pulmonary multidetector-row computed tomography angiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2010 Nov; 25(4):270-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.240
  45. Coming of age: coronary computed tomography angiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2010 Aug; 25(3):221-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.235
  46. Evaluation of plaques and stenosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010 Jul; 48(4):729-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  47. [Coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering: high diagnostic accuracy with low radiation dose]. Radiologe. 2010 Jun; 50(6):500-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  48. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2010 Jun; 45(6):306-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  49. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2009 Nov; 253(2):317-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  50. [Clinical applications of computed tomography coronary angiography]. Radiologia. 2009 Sep-Oct; 51(5):457-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  51. Noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque burden at coronary CT angiography: a better predictor of ischemia at stress myocardial perfusion imaging than calcium score and stenosis severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug; 193(2):410-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  52. Reproducibility of automated noncalcified coronary artery plaque burden assessment at coronary CT angiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2009 May; 24(2):96-102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.216
  53. Coronary CT angiography: automatic cardiac-phase selection for image reconstruction. Eur Radiol. 2009 Aug; 19(8):1906-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.214
  54. Coronary CT angiography: applications. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009 Jan; 47(1):91-107.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  55. A personalized and optimal approach for dosing contrast material at coronary computed tomography angiography. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 2009:3521-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  56. Coronary artery plaque formation at coronary CT angiography: morphological analysis and relationship to hemodynamics. Eur Radiol. 2009 Apr; 19(4):837-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  57. Giant Kawasaki coronary artery aneurysm: cardiac imaging evolution. Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec; 29(24):3042.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  58. Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia-initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2008 Nov; 18(11):2414-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  59. Right heart: split-bolus injection of diluted contrast medium for visualization at coronary CT angiography. Radiology. 2008 May; 247(2):356-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  60. [CT coronary angiography: indications, image acquisition, and interpretation]. Radiologia. 2008 Mar-Apr; 50(2):113-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  61. Evolving CT applications in ischemic heart disease. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008; 20(4):380-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  62. Replacing diagnostic catheterization with coronary CT angiography: the final frontier. Eur Heart J. 2007 Oct; 28(19):2305-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  63. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology. 2007 Jul; 244(1):112-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
  64. Coronary CT angiography. Radiology. 2007 Jul; 244(1):48-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  65. Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy? Radiology. 2007 Jul; 244(1):121-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  66. CT of the heart--quo vadis? J Thorac Imaging. 2007 Feb; 22(1):2-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  67. Coronary CTA: image acquisition and interpretation. J Thorac Imaging. 2007 Feb; 22(1):22-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  68. Coronary CTA: indications, patient selection, and clinical implications. J Thorac Imaging. 2007 Feb; 22(1):35-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  69. CT of coronary artery disease. J Thorac Imaging. 2007 Feb; 22(1):40-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  70. CT for imaging coronary artery disease: defining the paradigm for its application. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2005 Feb; 21(1):85-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  71. Novel developments in cardiac computed tomography. Am Heart Hosp J. 2005; 3(3):167-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  72. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2004 Jul; 232(1):18-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  73. Stable patients with suspected myocardial ischemia: comparison of machine-learning computed tomography-based fractional flow reserve and stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to detect myocardial ischemia. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 02 05; 22(1):34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  74. Calcium Scoring at Coronary CT Angiography Using Deep Learning. Radiology. 2022 02; 302(2):309-316.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  75. The Feasibility, Tolerability, Safety, and Accuracy of Low-radiation Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Regadenoson Compared With Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography. J Thorac Imaging. 2021 Nov 01; 36(6):345-352.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  76. Relationship of age, atherosclerosis and angiographic stenosis using artificial intelligence. Open Heart. 2021 11; 8(2).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  77. Coronary CT Fractional Flow Reserve before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Clinical Outcomes. Radiology. 2022 01; 302(1):50-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  78. Slow and Steady Wins the Race: Lower Heart Rates Improve Diagnostic Quality for Coronary CT Angiography. Radiology. 2021 09; 300(3):704-705.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  79. Influence of coronary stenosis location on diagnostic performance of machine learning-based fractional flow reserve from CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021 Nov-Dec; 15(6):492-498.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  80. A Brave New World: Toward Precision Phenotyping and Understanding of Coronary Artery Disease Using Radiomics Plaque Analysis. Radiology. 2021 04; 299(1):107-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  81. Evaluating a New Contrast Media Injection System in Coronary CT Angiography. Radiol Technol. 2021 Jan; 92(3):232-239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  82. Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging vs Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosis of Invasive Vessel-Specific Coronary Physiology: Predictive Modeling Results From the Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Determinants of Myocardial Ischemia (CREDENCE) Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 12 01; 5(12):1338-1348.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  83. Tube Voltage, DNA Double-Strand Breaks, and Image Quality in Coronary CT Angiography. Korean J Radiol. 2020 08; 21(8):967-977.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  84. Machine Learning and Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 07 09; 22(9):90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  85. Ischemia and outcome prediction by cardiac CT based machine learning. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec; 36(12):2429-2439.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  86. More holes, more contrast? Comparing an 18-gauge non-fenestrated catheter with a 22-gauge fenestrated catheter for cardiac CT. PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0234311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  87. Impact of machine learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography fractional flow reserve on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov; 30(11):5841-5851.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  88. Individualized coronary calcium scoring at any tube voltage using a kV-independent reconstruction algorithm. Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov; 30(11):5834-5840.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  89. Low-kV coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration using a kV-independent reconstruction algorithm. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 May - Jun; 14(3):246-250.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  90. Correlation of machine learning computed tomography-based fractional flow reserve with instantaneous wave free ratio to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Jun; 109(6):735-745.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  91. CT FFR for Ischemia-Specific CAD With?a?New Computational Fluid Dynamics Algorithm: A Chinese Multicenter Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 04; 13(4):980-990.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  92. Impact of Coronary Computerized Tomography Angiography-Derived Plaque Quantification and Machine-Learning Computerized Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve on Adverse Cardiac Outcome. Am J Cardiol. 2019 11 01; 124(9):1340-1348.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  93. Assessing the value of coronary artery computed tomography as the first-line anatomical test for stable patients with indications for invasive angiography due to suspected coronary artery disease. Initial cost analysis in the CAT-CAD randomized trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Jan - Feb; 14(1):75-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  94. Effect of Tube Voltage on Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary CT Angiography With Machine Learning: Results From the MACHINE Registry. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 08; 213(2):325-331.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  95. Automated plaque analysis for the prognostication of major adverse cardiac events. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jul; 116:76-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  96. Diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography for detection of lesion-specific ischemia: A multi-center study and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jul; 116:90-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  97. FFR-CT and CT Myocardial?Perfusion?Imaging: Friends or Foes? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 12; 12(12):2472-2474.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  98. Machine Learning Using CT-FFR Predicts Proximal Atherosclerotic Plaque Formation Associated With LAD Myocardial Bridging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 08; 12(8 Pt 1):1591-1593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  99. Coronary CT angiography radiation dose trends: A 10-year analysis to develop institutional diagnostic reference levels. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Apr; 113:140-147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  100. Progression of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and relationship with adverse cardiovascular event in asymptomatic diabetic patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 02 11; 19(1):39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  101. Association of Serum Lipid Profile With Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-derived Morphologic and Functional Quantitative Plaque Markers. J Thorac Imaging. 2019 Jan; 34(1):26-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  102. Coronary CT angiography-derived plaque quantification with artificial intelligence CT fractional flow reserve for the identification of lesion-specific ischemia. Eur Radiol. 2019 May; 29(5):2378-2387.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  103. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus (from the MACHINE Consortium). Am J Cardiol. 2019 02 15; 123(4):537-543.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  104. Fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA may have a prognostic role in myocardial bridging. Eur Radiol. 2019 Jun; 29(6):3017-3026.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  105. Artificial intelligence machine learning-based coronary CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFRML): Impact of iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Nov - Dec; 13(6):331-335.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  106. The value of Coronary Artery computed Tomography as the first-line anatomical test for stable patients with indications for invasive angiography due to suspected Coronary Artery Disease: CAT-CAD randomized trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 Nov - Dec; 12(6):472-479.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  107. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Machine-Learning Approach to Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve: Result From the MACHINE Consortium. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 06; 11(6):e007217.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  108. Predictive value of coronary computed tomography angiography in asymptomatic individuals with diabetes mellitus: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 Jul - Aug; 12(4):320-328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  109. Noninvasive Derivation of Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Review. J Thorac Imaging. 2018 Mar; 33(2):88-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  110. Contrast media injection protocol optimization for dual-energy coronary CT angiography: results from a circulation phantom. Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug; 28(8):3473-3481.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  111. Beam-hardening in 70-kV Coronary CT angiography: Artifact reduction using an advanced post-processing algorithm. Eur J Radiol. 2018 Apr; 101:111-117.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  112. High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction. Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul; 28(7):3097-3104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  113. Heavily Calcified Coronary Arteries: Advanced Calcium Subtraction Improves Luminal Visualization and Diagnostic Confidence in Dual-Energy Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. Invest Radiol. 2018 02; 53(2):103-109.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  114. Coronary Computed Tomography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve: A Rapidly Developing Field. JAMA Cardiol. 2018 01 01; 3(1):87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  115. Contrast Media for Coronary CT Angiography: Should an Iso-osmolar Agent Be Used? Radiology. 2018 01; 286(1):81-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  116. Diagnostic accuracy of low and high tube voltage coronary CT angiography using an X-ray tube potential-tailored contrast medium injection protocol. Eur Radiol. 2018 May; 28(5):2134-2142.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  117. What is the optimal anatomic location for coronary artery pressure measurement at CT-derived FFR? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep - Oct; 11(5):397-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  118. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep - Oct; 11(5):354-359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  119. CT angiography to evaluate coronary artery disease and revascularization requirement before trans-catheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep - Oct; 11(5):338-346.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  120. Coronary artery calcium in breast cancer survivors after radiation therapy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Sep; 33(9):1425-1431.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  121. CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration using iterative beam-hardening calcium correction reconstruction. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jun; 91:29-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  122. Combined diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography and computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve for the evaluation of myocardial ischemia: A meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 01; 236:100-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  123. Prognostic Value of Stress Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion CT in a Multicenter Population With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Apr; 208(4):761-769.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  124. Analysis of myocardial perfusion parameters in an ex-vivo porcine heart model using third generation dual-source CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Mar - Apr; 11(2):141-147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  125. Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT imaging: Prognostic value. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Jan - Feb; 11(1):16-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  126. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Plaque Quantification in Patients With Acute Coronary?Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2017 03 01; 119(5):712-718.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  127. Radiation Dose Levels of Retrospectively ECG-Gated Coronary CT Angiography Using 70-kVp Tube Voltage in Patients with High or Irregular Heart Rates. Acad Radiol. 2017 01; 24(1):30-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  128. Fractional flow reserve derived by coronary computed tomography angiography : A?sophisticated analysis method for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Herz. 2017 Sep; 42(6):604-606.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  129. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using 3rd-generation dual-source CT and automated tube voltage selection: Clinical application in a non-obese and obese patient population. Eur Radiol. 2017 Jun; 27(6):2298-2308.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  130. Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and?Data?System (CAD-RADS): An Expert Consensus Document of SCCT, ACR and NASCI: Endorsed by the ACC. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 09; 9(9):1099-1113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  131. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct; 85(10):1893-1899.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  132. CAD-RADS?: Coronary Artery Disease?-?Reporting and Data System: An?Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Dec; 13(12 Pt A):1458-1466.e9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  133. CAD-RADS(TM) Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug; 10(4):269-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  134. [Computed tomography in patients with chronic stable angina : Fractional flow reserve measurement]. Herz. 2017 Feb; 42(1):51-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  135. Automated tube voltage selection for radiation dose and contrast medium reduction at coronary CT angiography using 3(rd) generation dual-source CT. Eur Radiol. 2016 Oct; 26(10):3608-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  136. Non-Electrocardiogram-Triggered 70-kVp High-Pitch Computed Tomography Angiography of the Whole Aorta With Iterative Reconstruction: Initial Results. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016 Jan-Feb; 40(1):109-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  137. Coronary CT angiography in obese patients using 3(rd) generation dual-source CT: effect of body mass index on image quality. Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep; 26(9):2937-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  138. Different Approaches for Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment. Am J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 01; 117(3):486.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  139. Computed Tomography-Derived Parameters of Myocardial Morphology and Function in Black and White Patients With Acute Chest Pain. Am J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 01; 117(3):333-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  140. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  141. Image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70?kVp in a clinical setting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2016 Mar; 26(3):797-806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  142. Comparison of quantitative stenosis characteristics at routine coronary computed tomography angiography with invasive fractional flow reserve for assessing lesion-specific ischemia. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Nov-Dec; 9(6):546-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  143. Prospectively ECG-Triggered Sequential Dual-Source Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Influence of Heart Rate on Image Quality and Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0134194.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  144. Mammographic detection of breast arterial calcification as an independent predictor of coronary atherosclerotic disease in a single ethnic cohort of African American women. Atherosclerosis. 2015 Sep; 242(1):218-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  145. Diagnostic value of quantitative stenosis predictors with coronary CT angiography compared to invasive fractional flow reserve. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Aug; 84(8):1509-1515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  146. A novel approach for fractional flow reserve derivation from coronary computed tomographic angiography. Coron Artery Dis. 2015 May; 26(3):279-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  147. Expert opinion: How and when to perform CT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Thorac Imaging. 2015 May; 30(3):167-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  148. Computed tomography imaging of coronary artery plaque: characterization and prognosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Mar; 53(2):307-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  149. Technical prerequisites and imaging protocols for dynamic and dual energy myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Dec; 84(12):2401-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  150. The dream of a one-stop-shop: Meta-analysis on myocardial perfusion CT. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Dec; 84(12):2411-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  151. Coronary computed tomographic angiography in clinical practice: state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Mar; 53(2):287-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  152. Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve measurements--initial experience with a novel physician-driven algorithm. Eur Radiol. 2015 Apr; 25(4):1201-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  153. High-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp with low contrast medium volume: comparison of 80 and 100 kVp high-pitch protocols. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Nov; 93(22):e92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  154. Reply: methodologic concerns in reliability of noncalcified coronary artery plague burden quantification. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Sep; 203(3):W344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  155. Cardiac CT for myocardial ischaemia detection and characterization--comparative analysis. Br J Radiol. 2014 Nov; 87(1043):20140159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  156. Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 01; 114(9):1303-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  157. Iterative image reconstruction techniques: cardiothoracic computed tomography applications. J Thorac Imaging. 2014 Jul; 29(4):198-208.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  158. Incremental value of pharmacological stress cardiac dual-energy CT over coronary CT angiography alone for the assessment of coronary artery disease in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jul; 203(1):W70-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  159. Closing in on the K edge: coronary CT angiography at 100, 80, and 70 kV-initial comparison of a second- versus a third-generation dual-source CT system. Radiology. 2014 Nov; 273(2):373-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  160. Image quality and radiation dose of low tube voltage 3rd generation dual-source coronary CT angiography in obese patients: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jul; 24(7):1643-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  161. Transient Ischemic Dilation of the Left Ventricle on SPECT: Correlation with Findings at Coronary CT Angiography. J Nucl Med. 2014 Jun; 55(6):917-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  162. Differences in coronary artery disease by CT angiography between patients developing unstable angina pectoris vs. major adverse cardiac events. Eur J Radiol. 2014 07; 83(7):1113-1119.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  163. Feasibility of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography with 30 mL iodinated contrast agent at 70 kVp: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jul; 24(7):1537-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  164. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography: comparison of filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction with different strengths. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014 Mar-Apr; 38(2):179-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  165. Reproducibility of noncalcified coronary artery plaque burden quantification from coronary CT angiography across different image analysis platforms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jan; 202(1):W43-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  166. Comparison of the effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection on cardiac CT postprocessing. Acad Radiol. 2014 Mar; 21(3):318-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  167. Prevalence and types of coronary to pulmonary artery fistula in a Chinese population at dual-source CT coronary angiography. Acta Radiol. 2014 Nov; 55(9):1031-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  168. Congenital anomalies of coronary arteries in complex congenital heart disease: diagnosis and analysis with dual-source CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013 Nov-Dec; 7(6):383-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  169. Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography in infants with tetralogy of Fallot with pulmonary atresia and major aortopulmonary collateral arteries. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013 Nov-Dec; 7(6):367-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  170. Cardiovascular manifestations of Williams syndrome: imaging findings. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013 Nov-Dec; 7(6):400-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  171. Cardiovascular manifestations of heterotaxy and related situs abnormalities assessed with CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013 Nov-Dec; 7(6):408-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  172. Automated quantification of epicardial adipose tissue using CT angiography: evaluation of a prototype software. Eur Radiol. 2014 Feb; 24(2):519-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  173. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging: performance of 3D semi-automated evaluation software. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jan; 24(1):191-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  174. Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Dec; 14(12):1174-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  175. Predictive value of zero calcium score and low-end percentiles for the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis in stable patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Rofo. 2013 Aug; 185(8):726-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  176. Expert opinion: Is 24/7 coverage necessary for implementing coronary CT angiography in the emergency room setting? J Thorac Imaging. 2013 Jul; 28(4):203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  177. Computed tomography for planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Imaging. 2013 Jul; 28(4):231-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  178. Diagnostic performance evaluation of a computer-aided simple triage system for coronary CT angiography in patients with intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome. Acad Radiol. 2013 Aug; 20(8):980-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  179. Progression of arterial stiffness and coronary atherosclerosis: longitudinal evaluation by cardiac CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Apr; 200(4):798-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  180. Can coronary artery anomalies be detected on CT calcium scoring studies? Acad Radiol. 2013 May; 20(5):554-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  181. Individual patient data meta-analysis for the clinical assessment of coronary computed tomography angiography: protocol of the Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (CoMe-CCT). Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 15; 2:13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  182. Incremental prognostic value of cardiac CT angiography in patients with acute chest pain. Radiology. 2013 Jan; 266(1):364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  183. Cardiovascular CT angiography in neonates and children: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction with iterative image reconstruction techniques. Eur Radiol. 2013 May; 23(5):1306-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  184. Coronary CT angiography: comparison of a novel iterative reconstruction with filtered back projection for reconstruction of low-dose CT-Initial experience. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Feb; 82(2):275-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  185. Enhanced temporal resolution at cardiac CT with a novel CT image reconstruction algorithm: initial patient experience. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Feb; 82(2):270-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  186. Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the pulmonary artery with reversal of flow. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 23; 60(17):e31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  187. CT coronary angiography: image quality with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction compared with filtered back-projection. Clin Radiol. 2013 Mar; 68(3):272-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  188. Imaging evaluation of acute chest pain: systematic review of evidence base and cost-effectiveness. J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Sep; 27(5):289-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  189. Coronary CT angiography versus conventional cardiac angiography for therapeutic decision making in patients with high likelihood of coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2012 Nov; 265(2):385-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  190. Coronary computed tomography and triple rule out CT in patients with acute chest pain and an intermediate cardiac risk for acute coronary syndrome: part 2: economic aspects. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Jan; 82(1):106-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  191. Incremental prognostic value of different components of coronary atherosclerotic plaque at cardiac CT angiography beyond coronary calcification in patients with acute chest pain. Radiology. 2012 Sep; 264(3):679-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  192. CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction. Eur Radiol. 2013 Jan; 23(1):125-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  193. Coronary computed tomography and triple rule out CT in patients with acute chest pain and an intermediate cardiac risk profile. Part 1: impact on patient management. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Jan; 82(1):100-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  194. Progressive intra-individual radiation dose reduction during CT surveillance of a patient with ALCAPA syndrome. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012 Nov-Dec; 18(6):547-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  195. Prediction model to estimate presence of coronary artery disease: retrospective pooled analysis of existing cohorts. BMJ. 2012 Jun 12; 344:e3485.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  196. Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery with multiple coronary bicameral fistulae. J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Mar; 27(2):W32-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  197. CT of coronary heart disease: Part 1, CT of myocardial infarction, ischemia, and viability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar; 198(3):531-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  198. Coronary computed tomography--present status and future directions. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011 Oct; (173):3-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  199. Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction. Radiology. 2011 Aug; 260(2):390-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  200. Coronary atherosclerosis in African American and white patients with acute chest pain: characterization with coronary CT angiography. Radiology. 2011 Aug; 260(2):373-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  201. Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol. 2011 Oct; 21(10):2130-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  202. Iterative image reconstruction techniques: Applications for cardiac CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Jul-Aug; 5(4):225-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  203. Accuracy of coronary artery stenosis detection with CT versus conventional coronary angiography compared with composite findings from both tests as an enhanced reference standard. Eur Radiol. 2011 Sep; 21(9):1895-903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  204. Radiation-related cancer risks in a clinical patient population undergoing cardiac CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb; 196(2):W159-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  205. Recurrent subaortic membrane causing subvalvular aortic stenosis 13 years after primary surgical resection. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Mar-Apr; 5(2):127-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  206. High-temporal resolution dual-energy computed tomography of the heart using a novel hybrid image reconstruction algorithm: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011 Jan-Feb; 35(1):119-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  207. Adenosine-stress dynamic real-time myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: initial results. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec; 81(12):3703-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  208. Attenuation-based characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque: comparison of dual source and dual energy CT with single-source CT and histopathology. Eur J Radiol. 2011 Oct; 80(1):54-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  209. Dual-energy computed tomography for integrative imaging of coronary artery disease: principles and clinical applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010 Aug; 31(4):276-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  210. Reproducibility of CT signs of right ventricular dysfunction in acute pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun; 194(6):1500-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  211. [Comprehensive assessment of coronary disease using perfusion CT with pharmacologically induced stress]. Radiologia. 2010 Sep-Oct; 52(5):469-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  212. Relationship between coronary artery disease and epicardial adipose tissue quantification at cardiac CT: comparison between automatic volumetric measurement and manual bidimensional estimation. Acad Radiol. 2010 Jun; 17(6):727-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  213. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial volume perfusion imaging with second generation dual-source computed tomography: Concepts and first experiences. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010 Mar-Apr; 4(2):127-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  214. Automated computer-aided stenosis detection at coronary CT angiography: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2010 May; 20(5):1160-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  215. Computed tomographic angiography of infants with congenital heart disease receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Cardiol. 2009 Nov; 30(8):1154-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  216. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Aug 01; 104(3):318-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  217. Dual-energy CT of the heart--principles and protocols. Eur J Radiol. 2008 Dec; 68(3):423-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  218. New-onset heart failure caused by spontaneous papillary muscle rupture: diagnosis with dual-source computed tomographic coronary angiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jan; 137(1):e19-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  219. Use of multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of acute chest pain: a consensus statement of the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology. Eur Radiol. 2007 Aug; 17(8):2196-207.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  220. Use of multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of acute chest pain: a consensus statement of the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007 Aug; 23(4):415-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  221. Chasing the heart: new developments for cardiac CT. J Thorac Imaging. 2007 Feb; 22(1):4-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  222. Electrocardiographically gated 16-section CT of the thorax: cardiac motion suppression. Radiology. 2004 Dec; 233(3):927-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  223. Optimal contrast application for cardiac 4-detector-row computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2003 Nov; 38(11):690-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  224. Ultra-high resolution photon-counting coronary CT angiography improves coronary stenosis quantification over a wide range of heart rates - A dynamic phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2023 Apr; 161:110746.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  225. Diabetes, Atherosclerosis, and Stenosis by AI. Diabetes Care. 2023 02 01; 46(2):416-424.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  226. Stent imaging on a clinical dual-source photon-counting detector CT system-impact of luminal attenuation and sharp kernels on lumen visibility. Eur Radiol. 2023 Apr; 33(4):2469-2477.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  227. Serial Changes in Coronary Plaque Formation Using CT Angiography in Patients Undergoing PCSK9-Inhibitor Therapy With 1-year Follow-up. J Thorac Imaging. 2022 Sep 01; 37(5):285-291.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  228. Deep learning for vessel-specific coronary artery calcium scoring: validation on a multi-centre dataset. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 06 01; 23(6):846-854.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  229. Machine Learning for the Prevalence and Severity of Coronary Artery Calcification in Nondialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Chinese Large Cohort Study. J Thorac Imaging. 2022 Nov 01; 37(6):401-408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  230. Coronary CTA With AI-QCT Interpretation: Comparison With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Obstructive Stenosis Using Invasive Angiography as Reference Standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 09; 219(3):407-419.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  231. Impact of machine-learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve on decision-making in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Eur Radiol. 2022 Sep; 32(9):6008-6016.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  232. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Based Calcium Scoring: In Vitro and In Vivo Validation of a Novel Virtual Noniodine Reconstruction Algorithm on a Clinical, First-Generation Dual-Source Photon Counting-Detector System. Invest Radiol. 2022 08 01; 57(8):536-543.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  233. Functional CAD-RADS using FFRCT on therapeutic management and prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug; 32(8):5210-5221.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  234. [Morphological and functional diagnostics of coronary artery disease by computed tomography]. Herz. 2023 Feb; 48(1):39-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  235. One-year outcomes of CCTA alone versus machine learning-based FFRCT for coronary artery disease: a single-center, prospective study. Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug; 32(8):5179-5188.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  236. AI Evaluation of Stenosis on Coronary CTA, Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve: A CREDENCE Trial Substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 02; 16(2):193-205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  237. The effect of scan and patient parameters on the diagnostic performance of AI for detecting coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography. Clin Imaging. 2022 Apr; 84:149-158.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  238. Visualization of Concurrent Epicardial and Microvascular Coronary Artery Disease in a Patient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Feb 01; 31(1):3-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  239. Additive value of epicardial adipose tissue quantification to coronary CT angiography-derived plaque characterization and CT fractional flow reserve for the prediction of lesion-specific ischemia. Eur Radiol. 2022 Jun; 32(6):4243-4252.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  240. Prognostic value of epicardial adipose tissue volume in combination with coronary plaque and flow assessment for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events. Eur J Radiol. 2022 Mar; 148:110157.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  241. Non-invasive fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) in the evaluation of acute chest pain - Concepts and first experiences. Eur J Radiol. 2021 May; 138:109633.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  242. Prognostic Value of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-derived Morphologic and Quantitative Plaque Markers Using Semiautomated Plaque Software. J Thorac Imaging. 2021 Mar 01; 36(2):108-115.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  243. Serial coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve and plaque progression can predict long-term outcomes of coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep; 31(9):7110-7120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  244. Coronary plaque assessment of Vasodilative capacity by CT angiography effectively estimates fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol. 2021 05 15; 331:307-315.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  245. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging features prognostic information in patients with suspected myocardial infarction with non-obstructed coronary arteries. Int J Cardiol. 2021 03 15; 327:223-230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  246. Improved long-term prognostic value of coronary CT angiography-derived plaque measures and clinical parameters on adverse cardiac outcome using machine learning. Eur Radiol. 2021 Jan; 31(1):486-493.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  247. Coronary CT angiography derived plaque markers correlated with invasive instantaneous flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses. Eur J Radiol. 2020 Jan; 122:108744.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  248. Gender differences in the diagnostic performance of machine learning coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve -results from the MACHINE registry. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Oct; 119:108657.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  249. Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning Based CT-FFR in Detecting Ischemia in Myocardial Bridging and Concomitant Proximal Atherosclerotic Disease. Can J Cardiol. 2019 11; 35(11):1523-1533.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  250. [Methods of quantification of coronary artery calcifications with electron-beam and conventional computed tomography]. Radiologe. 1998 Dec; 38(12):1006-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  251. Prognostic value of coronary atherosclerosis progression evaluated by coronary CT angiography in patients with stable angina. Eur Radiol. 2018 Mar; 28(3):1066-1076.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  252. CT myocardial perfusion: state of the science. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2017 Jun; 65(3):252-264.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  253. CT angiography for planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement using automated tube voltage selection: Image quality and radiation exposure. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan; 86:276-283.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  254. Optimal timing of image acquisition for arterial first pass CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan; 86:227-233.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  255. Prognostic value of CT-derived left atrial and left ventricular measures in patients with acute chest pain. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan; 86:163-168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  256. Letter by Baumann et al Regarding Article, "Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Review and Critical Analysis". Circ Res. 2016 09 02; 119(6):e106-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  257. Semiautomated Global Quantification of Left Ventricular Myocardial Perfusion at Stress Dynamic CT:: Diagnostic Accuracy for Detection of Territorial Myocardial Perfusion Deficits Compared to Visual Assessment. Acad Radiol. 2016 Apr; 23(4):429-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  258. Absolute Versus Relative Myocardial Blood Flow by Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Anatomic Coronary Artery Disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul; 205(1):W67-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  259. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch 80?kVp coronary computed tomography angiography with 30?mL of 270?mg I/mL contrast material and iterative reconstruction. Acta Radiol. 2016 Mar; 57(3):287-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  260. Dual-source CT imaging to plan transcatheter aortic valve replacement: accuracy for diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2015 Apr; 275(1):80-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  261. Pectus excavatum as an unexpected cause for typical cardiologic signs revealed at imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Oct; 15(10):1184.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  262. Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT: feasibility in a multicenter patient population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug; 203(2):W174-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  263. CT in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Radiology. 2013 Dec; 269(3):650-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  264. Image quality and radiation dose of low dose coronary CT angiography in obese patients: sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov; 81(11):3141-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  265. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar; 198(3):521-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  266. Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging results from SPARC (Study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jan 31; 59(5):462-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  267. 64-slice multidetector-row computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: interobserver agreement among radiologists with varied levels of experience on a per-patient and per-segment basis. J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Jan; 27(1):29-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  268. Impact of right ventricular contrast attenuation on the accuracy of right ventricular function analysis at cardiac multi-detector-row CT. Eur J Radiol. 2010 Mar; 73(3):560-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  269. [Value of electron beam tomography (EBT)]. Rofo. 2004 Nov; 176(11):1566-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  270. Ex vivo coronary atherosclerotic plaque characterization with multi-detector-row CT. Eur Radiol. 2003 Sep; 13(9):2094-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  271. Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology. 2000 Nov; 217(2):564-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  272. Current development of cardiac imaging with multidetector-row CT. Eur J Radiol. 2000 Nov; 36(2):97-103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  273. [Initial experiences with multi-slice detector spiral CT in diagnosis of arteriosclerosis of coronary vessels]. Radiologe. 2000 Feb; 40(2):118-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  274. Detection and quantification of coronary artery calcification with electron-beam and conventional CT. Eur Radiol. 1999; 9(4):620-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  275. [Technical bases and acquisition conditions of electron-beam computed tomography]. Radiologe. 1998 Dec; 38(12):987-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.