Connection

U. Schoepf to Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications U. Schoepf has written about Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.
U. Schoepf
Connection Strength
7.244
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  1. The Feasibility, Tolerability, Safety, and Accuracy of Low-radiation Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Regadenoson Compared With Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography. J Thorac Imaging. 2021 Nov 01; 36(6):345-352.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.690
  2. Design of CTP-PRO study (impact of stress Cardiac computed Tomography myocardial Perfusion on downstream resources and PROgnosis in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: A multicenter international study). Int J Cardiol. 2019 10 01; 292:253-257.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.584
  3. Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 May - Jun; 13(3):26-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.571
  4. Intermodel disagreement of myocardial blood flow estimation from dynamic CT perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jan; 110:175-180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.562
  5. CT myocardial perfusion imaging: ready for prime time? Eur Radiol. 2018 Mar; 28(3):1253-1256.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.519
  6. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging identifies early perfusion abnormalities in diabetes and hypertension: Insights from a multicenter registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug; 10(4):301-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.473
  7. CT myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Mar; 204(3):487-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.434
  8. CT detection of myocardial blood volume deficits: dual-energy CT compared with single-energy CT spectra. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Nov-Dec; 5(6):421-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.344
  9. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2010 Jun; 45(6):306-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.312
  10. Coronary CTA With AI-QCT Interpretation: Comparison With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Obstructive Stenosis Using Invasive Angiography as Reference Standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 09; 219(3):407-419.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  11. Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging vs Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosis of Invasive Vessel-Specific Coronary Physiology: Predictive Modeling Results From the Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Determinants of Myocardial Ischemia (CREDENCE) Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 12 01; 5(12):1338-1348.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  12. Low CT temporal sampling rates result in a substantial underestimation of myocardial blood flow measurements. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Mar; 35(3):539-547.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  13. Diagnostic yield and accuracy of coronary CT angiography after abnormal nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. Sci Rep. 2018 06 15; 8(1):9228.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  14. Prognostic Value of Stress Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion CT in a Multicenter Population With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Apr; 208(4):761-769.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  15. Analysis of myocardial perfusion parameters in an ex-vivo porcine heart model using third generation dual-source CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Mar - Apr; 11(2):141-147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  16. Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT imaging: Prognostic value. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Jan - Feb; 11(1):16-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  17. CT myocardial perfusion: state of the science. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2017 Jun; 65(3):252-264.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  18. Optimal timing of image acquisition for arterial first pass CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan; 86:227-233.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  19. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct; 85(10):1893-1899.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  20. Absolute Versus Relative Myocardial Blood Flow by Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Anatomic Coronary Artery Disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul; 205(1):W67-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  21. Expert opinion: How and when to perform CT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Thorac Imaging. 2015 May; 30(3):167-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  22. Beyond stenosis detection: computed tomography approaches for determining the functional relevance of coronary artery disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Mar; 53(2):317-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  23. Cardiac CT for myocardial ischaemia detection and characterization--comparative analysis. Br J Radiol. 2014 Nov; 87(1043):20140159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  24. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging: performance of 3D semi-automated evaluation software. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jan; 24(1):191-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  25. Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Dec; 14(12):1174-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  26. Imaging evaluation of acute chest pain: systematic review of evidence base and cost-effectiveness. J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Sep; 27(5):289-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  27. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar; 198(3):521-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  28. Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging results from SPARC (Study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jan 31; 59(5):462-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  29. Cost-effectiveness of substituting dual-energy CT for SPECT in the assessment of myocardial perfusion for the workup of coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec; 81(12):3719-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  30. Integrative computed tomographic imaging of coronary artery disease. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2011 Jan; 9(1):27-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  31. Adenosine-stress dynamic real-time myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: initial results. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec; 81(12):3703-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  32. Noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque burden at coronary CT angiography: a better predictor of ischemia at stress myocardial perfusion imaging than calcium score and stenosis severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug; 193(2):410-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  33. Integrated assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion using a retractable SPECT camera combined with 64-slice CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2009 Apr; 19(4):845-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  34. Iodine quantification based on rest / stress perfusion dual energy CT to differentiate ischemic, infarcted and normal myocardium. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Mar; 112:136-143.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  35. What is the optimal anatomic location for coronary artery pressure measurement at CT-derived FFR? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep - Oct; 11(5):397-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  36. Semiautomated Global Quantification of Left Ventricular Myocardial Perfusion at Stress Dynamic CT:: Diagnostic Accuracy for Detection of Territorial Myocardial Perfusion Deficits Compared to Visual Assessment. Acad Radiol. 2016 Apr; 23(4):429-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  37. Prognostic value of perfusion defect volume at dual energy CTA in patients with pulmonary embolism: correlation with CTA obstruction scores, CT parameters of right ventricular dysfunction and adverse clinical outcome. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov; 81(11):3592-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.