U. Schoepf to Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
This is a "connection" page, showing publications U. Schoepf has written about Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.
Connection Strength
7.244
-
The Feasibility, Tolerability, Safety, and Accuracy of Low-radiation Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Regadenoson Compared With Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography. J Thorac Imaging. 2021 Nov 01; 36(6):345-352.
Score: 0.690
-
Design of CTP-PRO study (impact of stress Cardiac computed Tomography myocardial Perfusion on downstream resources and PROgnosis in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: A multicenter international study). Int J Cardiol. 2019 10 01; 292:253-257.
Score: 0.584
-
Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 May - Jun; 13(3):26-33.
Score: 0.571
-
Intermodel disagreement of myocardial blood flow estimation from dynamic CT perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jan; 110:175-180.
Score: 0.562
-
CT myocardial perfusion imaging: ready for prime time? Eur Radiol. 2018 Mar; 28(3):1253-1256.
Score: 0.519
-
Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging identifies early perfusion abnormalities in diabetes and hypertension: Insights from a multicenter registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug; 10(4):301-8.
Score: 0.473
-
CT myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Mar; 204(3):487-97.
Score: 0.434
-
CT detection of myocardial blood volume deficits: dual-energy CT compared with single-energy CT spectra. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Nov-Dec; 5(6):421-9.
Score: 0.344
-
Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2010 Jun; 45(6):306-13.
Score: 0.312
-
Coronary CTA With AI-QCT Interpretation: Comparison With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Obstructive Stenosis Using Invasive Angiography as Reference Standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 09; 219(3):407-419.
Score: 0.178
-
Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging vs Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosis of Invasive Vessel-Specific Coronary Physiology: Predictive Modeling Results From the Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Determinants of Myocardial Ischemia (CREDENCE) Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 12 01; 5(12):1338-1348.
Score: 0.162
-
Low CT temporal sampling rates result in a substantial underestimation of myocardial blood flow measurements. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Mar; 35(3):539-547.
Score: 0.139
-
Diagnostic yield and accuracy of coronary CT angiography after abnormal nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. Sci Rep. 2018 06 15; 8(1):9228.
Score: 0.136
-
Prognostic Value of Stress Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion CT in a Multicenter Population With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Apr; 208(4):761-769.
Score: 0.124
-
Analysis of myocardial perfusion parameters in an ex-vivo porcine heart model using third generation dual-source CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Mar - Apr; 11(2):141-147.
Score: 0.124
-
Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT imaging: Prognostic value. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Jan - Feb; 11(1):16-24.
Score: 0.123
-
CT myocardial perfusion: state of the science. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2017 Jun; 65(3):252-264.
Score: 0.123
-
Optimal timing of image acquisition for arterial first pass CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan; 86:227-233.
Score: 0.122
-
Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct; 85(10):1893-1899.
Score: 0.120
-
Absolute Versus Relative Myocardial Blood Flow by Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Anatomic Coronary Artery Disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul; 205(1):W67-72.
Score: 0.111
-
Expert opinion: How and when to perform CT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Thorac Imaging. 2015 May; 30(3):167-8.
Score: 0.110
-
Beyond stenosis detection: computed tomography approaches for determining the functional relevance of coronary artery disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Mar; 53(2):317-34.
Score: 0.107
-
Cardiac CT for myocardial ischaemia detection and characterization--comparative analysis. Br J Radiol. 2014 Nov; 87(1043):20140159.
Score: 0.105
-
Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging: performance of 3D semi-automated evaluation software. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jan; 24(1):191-9.
Score: 0.098
-
Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Dec; 14(12):1174-80.
Score: 0.097
-
Imaging evaluation of acute chest pain: systematic review of evidence base and cost-effectiveness. J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Sep; 27(5):289-95.
Score: 0.091
-
Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar; 198(3):521-9.
Score: 0.088
-
Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging results from SPARC (Study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jan 31; 59(5):462-74.
Score: 0.088
-
Cost-effectiveness of substituting dual-energy CT for SPECT in the assessment of myocardial perfusion for the workup of coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec; 81(12):3719-25.
Score: 0.082
-
Integrative computed tomographic imaging of coronary artery disease. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2011 Jan; 9(1):27-43.
Score: 0.081
-
Adenosine-stress dynamic real-time myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: initial results. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec; 81(12):3703-10.
Score: 0.081
-
Noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque burden at coronary CT angiography: a better predictor of ischemia at stress myocardial perfusion imaging than calcium score and stenosis severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug; 193(2):410-8.
Score: 0.074
-
Integrated assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion using a retractable SPECT camera combined with 64-slice CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2009 Apr; 19(4):845-56.
Score: 0.070
-
Iodine quantification based on rest / stress perfusion dual energy CT to differentiate ischemic, infarcted and normal myocardium. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Mar; 112:136-143.
Score: 0.036
-
What is the optimal anatomic location for coronary artery pressure measurement at CT-derived FFR? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep - Oct; 11(5):397-403.
Score: 0.032
-
Semiautomated Global Quantification of Left Ventricular Myocardial Perfusion at Stress Dynamic CT:: Diagnostic Accuracy for Detection of Territorial Myocardial Perfusion Deficits Compared to Visual Assessment. Acad Radiol. 2016 Apr; 23(4):429-37.
Score: 0.029
-
Prognostic value of perfusion defect volume at dual energy CTA in patients with pulmonary embolism: correlation with CTA obstruction scores, CT parameters of right ventricular dysfunction and adverse clinical outcome. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov; 81(11):3592-7.
Score: 0.022