U. Schoepf to Adenosine
This is a "connection" page, showing publications U. Schoepf has written about Adenosine.
Connection Strength
0.773
-
Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2010 Jun; 45(6):306-13.
Score: 0.324
-
Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar; 198(3):521-9.
Score: 0.091
-
Adenosine-stress dynamic real-time myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: initial results. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec; 81(12):3703-10.
Score: 0.084
-
[Comprehensive assessment of coronary disease using perfusion CT with pharmacologically induced stress]. Radiologia. 2010 Sep-Oct; 52(5):469-72.
Score: 0.081
-
Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial volume perfusion imaging with second generation dual-source computed tomography: Concepts and first experiences. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010 Mar-Apr; 4(2):127-35.
Score: 0.079
-
Optimal timing of image acquisition for arterial first pass CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan; 86:227-233.
Score: 0.032
-
Semiautomated Global Quantification of Left Ventricular Myocardial Perfusion at Stress Dynamic CT:: Diagnostic Accuracy for Detection of Territorial Myocardial Perfusion Deficits Compared to Visual Assessment. Acad Radiol. 2016 Apr; 23(4):429-37.
Score: 0.030
-
Incremental value of pharmacological stress cardiac dual-energy CT over coronary CT angiography alone for the assessment of coronary artery disease in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jul; 203(1):W70-7.
Score: 0.027
-
First-arterial-pass dual-energy CT for assessment of myocardial blood supply: do we need rest, stress, and delayed acquisition? Comparison with SPECT. Radiology. 2014 Mar; 270(3):708-16.
Score: 0.026