Connection

Gerard Silvestri to Smoking

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Gerard Silvestri has written about Smoking.
Connection Strength

3.463
  1. The Association between Smoking Abstinence and Mortality in the National Lung Screening Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar 01; 193(5):534-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.296
  2. Screening for Lung Cancer Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography. Are We Headed for DANTE's Paradise or Inferno? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 May 15; 191(10):1100-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.280
  3. Reply: Lung Cancer Screening: The Balance between Harm and Benefit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 May 15; 191(10):1209-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.280
  4. Lung cancer screening. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan 01; 191(1):19-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.273
  5. Current status of tobacco policy and control. J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Jul; 27(4):213-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  6. Screening for lung cancer: it works, but does it really work? Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18; 155(8):537-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.217
  7. The Master Settlement Agreement and its impact on tobacco use 10 years later: lessons for physicians about health policy making. Chest. 2010 Mar; 137(3):692-700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.195
  8. Attitudes towards screening for lung cancer among smokers and their non-smoking counterparts. Thorax. 2007 Feb; 62(2):126-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  9. One hundred years of lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Sep 01; 172(5):523-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  10. Characteristics of Persons Screened for Lung Cancer in the United States : A Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Nov; 175(11):1501-1505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  11. Executive Summary: Screening for Lung Cancer: Chest Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2021 11; 160(5):1959-1980.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  12. Predicted impact of attaining smoking reduction goals on mortality. South Med J. 2001 Feb; 94(2):176-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  13. Assessment of Integrated Classifier's Ability to Distinguish Benign From Malignant Lung Nodules: Extended Analyses and 2-Year Follow-Up Results of the PANOPTIC (Pulmonary Nodule Plasma Proteomic Classifier) Trial. Chest. 2021 03; 159(3):1283-1287.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  14. Smoking Trends and Lung Cancer Mortality: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Ann Intern Med. 2018 11 20; 169(10):721-722.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  15. Tobacco Dependence Predicts Higher Lung Cancer and Mortality Rates and Lower Rates of Smoking Cessation in the National Lung Screening Trial. Chest. 2018 07; 154(1):110-118.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  16. Factors Associated with a Positive Baseline Screening Exam Result in the National Lung Screening Trial. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 09; 13(9):1568-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  17. Lung cancer risk test trial: study design, participant baseline characteristics, bronchoscopy safety, and establishment of a biospecimen repository. BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Jan 22; 16:16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  18. A Bronchial Genomic Classifier for the Diagnostic Evaluation of Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 16; 373(3):243-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  19. Evaluation of the lung cancer risks at which to screen ever- and never-smokers: screening rules applied to the PLCO and NLST cohorts. PLoS Med. 2014 Dec; 11(12):e1001764.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  20. Evaluating the effect of access to free medication to quit smoking: a clinical trial testing the role of motivation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Jul; 16(7):992-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  21. Attitudes and beliefs toward lung cancer screening among US Veterans. Chest. 2013 Dec; 144(6):1783-1787.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  22. Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 21; 368(8):728-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  23. Invited commentary: the etiology of lung cancer in men compared with women. Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Apr 01; 177(7):613-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  24. Cigarette smoking and the risk of dying from tobacco-related malignancies by race. Anticancer Res. 2011 Nov; 31(11):3891-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  25. Screening for lung cancer in a high-risk group: but I still haven't found what I'm looking for... Eur Respir J. 2007 Jan; 29(1):6-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  26. The Cost-Effectiveness of Nicotine Replacement Therapy Sampling in Primary Care: a Markov Cohort Simulation Model. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 11; 37(14):3684-3691.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  27. Tobacco Treatment Specialist Training for Lung Cancer Screening Providers. Am J Prev Med. 2021 11; 61(5):765-768.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  28. Primary Care Provider and Patient Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. A Qualitative Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 11; 13(11):1977-1982.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  29. Screening and early detection efforts in lung cancer. Cancer. 2015 May 01; 121(9):1347-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  30. Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial. N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 06; 371(19):1793-802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  31. Targeting of low-dose CT screening according to the risk of lung-cancer death. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 18; 369(3):245-254.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  32. U.S. primary care physicians' lung cancer screening beliefs and recommendations. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Nov; 39(5):411-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  33. The risk of dying from lung cancer by race: a prospective cohort study in a biracial cohort in Charleston, South Carolina. Ann Epidemiol. 2009 May; 19(5):304-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  34. Lung and bronchus cancer disparities in South Carolina: epidemiology and strategies for prevention. J S C Med Assoc. 2006 Aug; 102(7):183-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.