Kit Simpson to Cost-Benefit Analysis
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Kit Simpson has written about Cost-Benefit Analysis.
Connection Strength
2.952
-
Cost of treatment in a US commercially insured, HIV-1-infected population. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e98152.
Score: 0.398
-
Measuring Value: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Occupational Therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 2022 Jan 01; 76(1).
Score: 0.168
-
Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of oliceridine in the treatment of acute pain. J Comp Eff Res. 2021 10; 10(15):1107-1119.
Score: 0.163
-
The cost-effectiveness of treatment with lamivudine and zidovudine compared with zidovudine alone: a comparison of Markov model and trial data estimates. Am J Manag Care. 1998 Jul; 4(7):1004-12.
Score: 0.132
-
Observed Cost and Variations in Short Term Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy for Ischemic Stroke in Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 May 08; 6(5).
Score: 0.122
-
Design and assessment of cost-effectiveness studies in AIDS populations. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1995; 10 Suppl 4:S28-32.
Score: 0.104
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of annual Trichomonas vaginalis screening and treatment in HIV-positive women to prevent HIV transmission. Sex Transm Dis. 2014 Jun; 41(6):353-8.
Score: 0.099
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of 2 surveillance options for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2014 Apr; 18(2):136-41.
Score: 0.098
-
Costs and clinical outcomes of noninvasive fetal RhD typing for targeted prophylaxis. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep; 122(3):579-85.
Score: 0.094
-
Lopinavir/ritonavir versus darunavir plus ritonavir for HIV infection: a cost-effectiveness analysis for the United States. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 May; 31(5):427-44.
Score: 0.092
-
The cost of Medicaid savings: the potential detrimental public health impact of neonatal circumcision defunding. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 2012:540295.
Score: 0.089
-
A cost-effectiveness analysis of anal cancer screening in HIV-positive women. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2012 Jul; 16(3):275-80.
Score: 0.087
-
A cost-effectiveness analysis of inhaled corticosteroid delivery for children with asthma in the emergency department. J Pediatr. 2012 Nov; 161(5):903-7.
Score: 0.087
-
Economic analysis of secondary trial data. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Jan-Feb; 54(4):351-6.
Score: 0.084
-
Economics of switching to second-line antiretroviral therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir in Africa: estimates based on DART trial results and costs for Uganda and Kenya. Value Health. 2011 Dec; 14(8):1048-54.
Score: 0.083
-
Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes: a cost analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun; 202(6):632.e1-6.
Score: 0.075
-
Cost-effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a health economics analysis. Adv Ther. 2009 Mar; 26(3):346-68.
Score: 0.069
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of lopinavir/ritonavir and atazanavir+ritonavir regimens in the CASTLE study. Adv Ther. 2009 Feb; 26(2):185-93.
Score: 0.069
-
Comparison of Markov model and discrete-event simulation techniques for HIV. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009; 27(2):159-65.
Score: 0.068
-
Cost-effectiveness of tipranavir in treatment-experienced HIV patients in the United States. HIV Clin Trials. 2008 Jul-Aug; 9(4):225-37.
Score: 0.066
-
Cost effectiveness of an inpatient influenza immunization assessment and delivery program for children with asthma. J Hosp Med. 2008 Mar; 3(2):134-41.
Score: 0.065
-
Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir compared with atazanavir in antiretroviral-naive patients: modelling the combined effects of HIV and heart disease. Clin Drug Investig. 2007; 27(1):67-74.
Score: 0.060
-
Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir tablets compared with atazanavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced patients in the UK, France, Italy and Spain. Clin Drug Investig. 2007; 27(12):807-17.
Score: 0.060
-
Cost-effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir versus nelfinavir as the first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen for HIV infection. HIV Clin Trials. 2004 Sep-Oct; 5(5):294-304.
Score: 0.051
-
Decision analysis of the cost-effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy for treatment of nonpsychotic severe depression. CNS Spectr. 2004 Jun; 9(6):476-82.
Score: 0.050
-
COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: Considerations and Costs of Telehealth Exercise Programs for Older Adults With Functional Impairments Living at Home-Lessons Learned From a Pilot Case Study. Phys Ther. 2020 08 12; 100(8):1278-1288.
Score: 0.038
-
Modeling the use of triple combination therapy in five countries: nevirapine, Zidovudine, and Didanosine. Value Health. 2000 May-Jun; 3(3):186-201.
Score: 0.037
-
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of the PROPPR trial transfusion protocols. Transfusion. 2020 05; 60(5):922-931.
Score: 0.037
-
Health economics in HIV disease. A review of the European literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999; 15 Suppl 1:1-12.
Score: 0.034
-
Cost-effectiveness of mandatory compared with voluntary screening for human immunodeficiency virus in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Feb; 91(2):174-81.
Score: 0.032
-
Modelling the cost effectiveness of lamivudine/zidovudine combination therapy in HIV infection. Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Jul; 12(1):54-66.
Score: 0.031
-
Is POCT cost effective for coronary bypass patients in ICUs? MLO Med Lab Obs. 1996 Feb; 28(2):58-62.
Score: 0.028
-
Cost effectiveness of antiviral treatment with zalcitabine plus zidovudine for AIDS patients with CD4+ counts less than 300/microliters in 5 European countries. Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Dec; 6(6):553-62.
Score: 0.026
-
Cost-minimization comparison of darunavir plus ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1 infected treatment-na?ve women of childbearing age. J Med Econ. 2014 Apr; 17(4):250-8.
Score: 0.024
-
Cost-effectiveness of maternal treatment to prevent perinatal hepatitis B virus transmission. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep; 118(3):655-662.
Score: 0.021
-
Informing the mammography coverage debate. Results of meta-analysis, computer modeling, and issue analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1991; 7(4):616-31.
Score: 0.020
-
Cost-utility of treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a Markov state-transition decision analysis model. Clin Drug Investig. 2009; 29(10):635-46.
Score: 0.017
-
Design of the economic evaluation for the Interventional Management of Stroke (III) trial. Int J Stroke. 2008 May; 3(2):138-44.
Score: 0.016
-
A markov model of the cost effectiveness of olanzapine treatment for agitation and psychosis in Alzheimer's disease. Clin Drug Investig. 2008; 28(5):291-303.
Score: 0.016
-
The effect of cost construction based on either DRG or ICD-9 codes or risk group stratification on the resulting cost-effectiveness ratios. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004; 22(18):1209-16.
Score: 0.012
-
Economic decision analysis model of screening for lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2001 Sep; 37(14):1759-67.
Score: 0.010
-
Effectiveness and economic impact of screening for colorectal cancer by mass fecal occult blood testing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Nov; 95(11):3250-8.
Score: 0.010
-
Impact of zidovudine-based triple combination therapy on an AIDS drug assistance program. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000 Apr 01; 23(4):302-13.
Score: 0.009