Kit Simpson to Markov Chains
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Kit Simpson has written about Markov Chains.
Connection Strength
1.594
-
Comparison of Markov model and discrete-event simulation techniques for HIV. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009; 27(2):159-65.
Score: 0.305
-
Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a preliminary decision analysis. Chest. 2003 Dec; 124(6):2087-92.
Score: 0.214
-
The cost-effectiveness of treatment with lamivudine and zidovudine compared with zidovudine alone: a comparison of Markov model and trial data estimates. Am J Manag Care. 1998 Jul; 4(7):1004-12.
Score: 0.147
-
A cost-effectiveness analysis of anal cancer screening in HIV-positive women. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2012 Jul; 16(3):275-80.
Score: 0.097
-
Economic and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) comparison of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and atazanavir plus ritonavir (ATV+RTV) based regimens for antiretroviral therapy (ART)-na?ve and -experienced United Kingdom patients in 2011. J Med Econ. 2012; 15(4):796-806.
Score: 0.097
-
Economic analysis of secondary trial data. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Jan-Feb; 54(4):351-6.
Score: 0.094
-
Economics of switching to second-line antiretroviral therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir in Africa: estimates based on DART trial results and costs for Uganda and Kenya. Value Health. 2011 Dec; 14(8):1048-54.
Score: 0.093
-
Cost-effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a health economics analysis. Adv Ther. 2009 Mar; 26(3):346-68.
Score: 0.077
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of lopinavir/ritonavir and atazanavir+ritonavir regimens in the CASTLE study. Adv Ther. 2009 Feb; 26(2):185-93.
Score: 0.077
-
Cost-effectiveness of tipranavir in treatment-experienced HIV patients in the United States. HIV Clin Trials. 2008 Jul-Aug; 9(4):225-37.
Score: 0.074
-
Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir compared with atazanavir in antiretroviral-naive patients: modelling the combined effects of HIV and heart disease. Clin Drug Investig. 2007; 27(1):67-74.
Score: 0.066
-
Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir compared with atazanavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced patients in the US. Clin Drug Investig. 2007; 27(7):443-52.
Score: 0.066
-
Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir tablets compared with atazanavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced patients in the UK, France, Italy and Spain. Clin Drug Investig. 2007; 27(12):807-17.
Score: 0.066
-
Cost-effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir versus nelfinavir as the first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen for HIV infection. HIV Clin Trials. 2004 Sep-Oct; 5(5):294-304.
Score: 0.056
-
Cost-minimization comparison of darunavir plus ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1 infected treatment-na?ve women of childbearing age. J Med Econ. 2014 Apr; 17(4):250-8.
Score: 0.027
-
Cost-utility of treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a Markov state-transition decision analysis model. Clin Drug Investig. 2009; 29(10):635-46.
Score: 0.019
-
A markov model of the cost effectiveness of olanzapine treatment for agitation and psychosis in Alzheimer's disease. Clin Drug Investig. 2008; 28(5):291-303.
Score: 0.018