Kit Simpson to HIV Infections
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Kit Simpson has written about HIV Infections.
Connection Strength
4.516
-
HIV economic burden of illness in the Veterans Health Administration population. AIDS Care. 2015; 27(1):123-31.
Score: 0.272
-
Cost of treatment in a US commercially insured, HIV-1-infected population. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e98152.
Score: 0.266
-
Costs of adverse events among patients with HIV infection treated with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. HIV Med. 2014 Sep; 15(8):488-98.
Score: 0.263
-
Review of the impact of NNRTI-based HIV treatment regimens on patient-reported disease burden. AIDS Care. 2014 Apr; 26(4):466-75.
Score: 0.255
-
Lopinavir/ritonavir versus darunavir plus ritonavir for HIV infection: a cost-effectiveness analysis for the United States. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 May; 31(5):427-44.
Score: 0.247
-
Responsiveness of the MOS-HIV and EQ-5D in HIV-infected adults receiving antiretroviral therapies. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Mar 12; 11:42.
Score: 0.245
-
The cost of Medicaid savings: the potential detrimental public health impact of neonatal circumcision defunding. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 2012:540295.
Score: 0.238
-
A cost-effectiveness analysis of anal cancer screening in HIV-positive women. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2012 Jul; 16(3):275-80.
Score: 0.233
-
Economics of switching to second-line antiretroviral therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir in Africa: estimates based on DART trial results and costs for Uganda and Kenya. Value Health. 2011 Dec; 14(8):1048-54.
Score: 0.223
-
Economic modeling of HIV treatments. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2010 May; 5(3):242-8.
Score: 0.201
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of lopinavir/ritonavir and atazanavir+ritonavir regimens in the CASTLE study. Adv Ther. 2009 Feb; 26(2):185-93.
Score: 0.185
-
Comparison of Markov model and discrete-event simulation techniques for HIV. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009; 27(2):159-65.
Score: 0.183
-
Cost-effectiveness of tipranavir in treatment-experienced HIV patients in the United States. HIV Clin Trials. 2008 Jul-Aug; 9(4):225-37.
Score: 0.177
-
Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir compared with atazanavir in antiretroviral-naive patients: modelling the combined effects of HIV and heart disease. Clin Drug Investig. 2007; 27(1):67-74.
Score: 0.159
-
Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir compared with atazanavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced patients in the US. Clin Drug Investig. 2007; 27(7):443-52.
Score: 0.159
-
Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir tablets compared with atazanavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced patients in the UK, France, Italy and Spain. Clin Drug Investig. 2007; 27(12):807-17.
Score: 0.159
-
Cost-effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir versus nelfinavir as the first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen for HIV infection. HIV Clin Trials. 2004 Sep-Oct; 5(5):294-304.
Score: 0.136
-
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Care Continuum of Youth Living with HIV: Qualitative Study of the Scale It Up Program Clinical Sites. AIDS Behav. 2022 Dec; 26(12):4026-4033.
Score: 0.116
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Community-Based vs Clinic-Based Healthy Choices Motivational Intervention to Improve Health Behaviors Among Youth Living With HIV: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 08 03; 3(8):e2014650.
Score: 0.102
-
Modeling the use of triple combination therapy in five countries: nevirapine, Zidovudine, and Didanosine. Value Health. 2000 May-Jun; 3(3):186-201.
Score: 0.100
-
Improving the Youth HIV Prevention and Care Cascades: Innovative Designs in the Adolescent Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2019 09; 33(9):388-398.
Score: 0.096
-
Health economics in HIV disease. A review of the European literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999; 15 Suppl 1:1-12.
Score: 0.092
-
The cost-effectiveness of treatment with lamivudine and zidovudine compared with zidovudine alone: a comparison of Markov model and trial data estimates. Am J Manag Care. 1998 Jul; 4(7):1004-12.
Score: 0.088
-
Burden of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance in HIV-1-infected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2014 Aug; 30(8):753-68.
Score: 0.067
-
Cost-minimization comparison of darunavir plus ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1 infected treatment-na?ve women of childbearing age. J Med Econ. 2014 Apr; 17(4):250-8.
Score: 0.065
-
Broadening the perspective when assessing evidence on boosted protease inhibitor-based regimens for initial antiretroviral therapy. Adv Ther. 2010 Nov; 27(11):763-73.
Score: 0.052
-
Piloting a method to measure satisfaction with HIV care. Am J Med Qual. 2010 Sep-Oct; 25(5):384-91.
Score: 0.051
-
Impact of zidovudine-based triple combination therapy on an AIDS drug assistance program. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000 Apr 01; 23(4):302-13.
Score: 0.025
-
Cost-effectiveness of mandatory compared with voluntary screening for human immunodeficiency virus in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Feb; 91(2):174-81.
Score: 0.021
-
Modelling the cost effectiveness of lamivudine/zidovudine combination therapy in HIV infection. Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Jul; 12(1):54-66.
Score: 0.021
-
The effect of cost construction based on either DRG or ICD-9 codes or risk group stratification on the resulting cost-effectiveness ratios. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004; 22(18):1209-16.
Score: 0.008
-
Measuring the effect of clinical guidelines on patient outcomes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000; 16(4):1013-23.
Score: 0.006