Kit Simpson to Quality-Adjusted Life Years
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Kit Simpson has written about Quality-Adjusted Life Years.
Connection Strength
1.144
-
Observed Cost and Variations in Short Term Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy for Ischemic Stroke in Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 May 08; 6(5).
Score: 0.139
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of annual Trichomonas vaginalis screening and treatment in HIV-positive women to prevent HIV transmission. Sex Transm Dis. 2014 Jun; 41(6):353-8.
Score: 0.113
-
Lopinavir/ritonavir versus darunavir plus ritonavir for HIV infection: a cost-effectiveness analysis for the United States. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 May; 31(5):427-44.
Score: 0.105
-
Economic analysis of secondary trial data. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Jan-Feb; 54(4):351-6.
Score: 0.096
-
Economics of switching to second-line antiretroviral therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir in Africa: estimates based on DART trial results and costs for Uganda and Kenya. Value Health. 2011 Dec; 14(8):1048-54.
Score: 0.095
-
Cost-effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a health economics analysis. Adv Ther. 2009 Mar; 26(3):346-68.
Score: 0.079
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of lopinavir/ritonavir and atazanavir+ritonavir regimens in the CASTLE study. Adv Ther. 2009 Feb; 26(2):185-93.
Score: 0.078
-
Cost-effectiveness of tipranavir in treatment-experienced HIV patients in the United States. HIV Clin Trials. 2008 Jul-Aug; 9(4):225-37.
Score: 0.075
-
Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir compared with atazanavir in antiretroviral-naive patients: modelling the combined effects of HIV and heart disease. Clin Drug Investig. 2007; 27(1):67-74.
Score: 0.068
-
Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir compared with atazanavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced patients in the US. Clin Drug Investig. 2007; 27(7):443-52.
Score: 0.068
-
Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir tablets compared with atazanavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced patients in the UK, France, Italy and Spain. Clin Drug Investig. 2007; 27(12):807-17.
Score: 0.068
-
Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a preliminary decision analysis. Chest. 2003 Dec; 124(6):2087-92.
Score: 0.055
-
Evaluating the quality of life associated with rifabutin prophylaxis for Mycobacterium avium complex in persons with AIDS: combining Q-TWiST and multiattribute utility techniques. Qual Life Res. 1995 Aug; 4(4):309-18.
Score: 0.031
-
Cost-minimization comparison of darunavir plus ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1 infected treatment-na?ve women of childbearing age. J Med Econ. 2014 Apr; 17(4):250-8.
Score: 0.028
-
Cost-utility of treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a Markov state-transition decision analysis model. Clin Drug Investig. 2009; 29(10):635-46.
Score: 0.019
-
A markov model of the cost effectiveness of olanzapine treatment for agitation and psychosis in Alzheimer's disease. Clin Drug Investig. 2008; 28(5):291-303.
Score: 0.018
-
Economic decision analysis model of screening for lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2001 Sep; 37(14):1759-67.
Score: 0.012