Connection

Steven Swift to Reproducibility of Results

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Steven Swift has written about Reproducibility of Results.
Connection Strength

0.401
  1. Validation of Persian version of the Prolapse Quality-of-Life questionnaire (P-QOL). Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Feb; 23(2):229-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  2. Test-retest reliability of the cotton swab (Q-tip) test in the evaluation of the incontinent female. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Aug; 21(8):963-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  3. Validation of the Slovakian version of the P-QOL questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jan; 21(1):53-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  4. Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Nov; 17(6):615-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  5. Test-retest reliability of the cough stress test in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jul; 94(1):99-102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  6. The reliability of performing a screening cystometrogram using a fetal monitoring device for the detection of detrusor instability. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 May; 89(5 Pt 1):708-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  7. Validation of the Polish version of P-QoL questionnaire. Ginekol Pol. 2016; 87(7):477-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  8. Validation of the French version of the P-QoL questionnaire. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Sep; 192:10-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  9. The FIGO assessment scoring system (FASS): a new holistic classification tool to assess women with pelvic floor dysfunction: validity and reliability. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jun; 26(6):859-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  10. Body image in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Questionnaire: development and validation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Aug; 211(2):174.e1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  11. Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jun; 22(6):645-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  12. Pelvic organ prolapse: is there a difference in POPQ exam results based on time of day, morning or afternoon? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug; 199(2):200.e1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  13. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec; 175(6):1467-70; discussion 1470-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.