Connection

Steven Swift to Uterine Prolapse

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Steven Swift has written about Uterine Prolapse.
Connection Strength

3.716
  1. Update in Transvaginal Grafts: The Role of Lightweight Meshes, Biologics, and Hybrid Grafts in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021 Sep; 48(3):515-533.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.763
  2. The use of vaginal mesh has no advantage over conventional surgery in the treatment of prolapse: FOR: The case of mistaken doctor bias. BJOG. 2016 Jan; 123(1):143.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.515
  3. Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Nov; 17(6):615-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.262
  4. Pelvic organ prolapse: is it time to define it? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Nov-Dec; 16(6):425-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.255
  5. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST) and bowel symptoms: straining at stool is associated with perineal and anterior vaginal descent in a general gynecologic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May; 192(5):1516-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.246
  6. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar; 192(3):795-806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.243
  7. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug; 189(2):372-7; discussion 377-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  8. Pelvic organ support in nulliparous pregnant and nonpregnant women: a case control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jul; 187(1):99-102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  9. Case-control study of etiologic factors in the development of severe pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001; 12(3):187-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  10. The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug; 183(2):277-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  11. The clinical evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1998 Dec; 25(4):783-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  12. Comparison of pelvic organ prolapse in the dorsal lithotomy compared with the standing position. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun; 91(6):961-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  13. Pelvic organ prolapse: is there a difference in POPQ exam results based on time of day, morning or afternoon? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug; 199(2):200.e1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  14. Prediction of pelvic organ prolapse using an artificial neural network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug; 199(2):193.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  15. "First do no harm" and the emerging story of the vaginal reconstructive mesh implant. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Sep; 18(9):983-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  16. Prevalence of severe pelvic organ prolapse in relation to job description and socioeconomic status: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Jun; 17(4):340-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  17. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec; 175(6):1467-70; discussion 1470-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  18. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jan; 21(1):5-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.