Connection

Michael Zile to Valsartan

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Zile has written about Valsartan.
Michael Zile
Connection Strength
5.929
Valsartan
  1. Prognostic Implications of Changes in N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Dec 06; 68(22):2425-2436.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.544
  2. Plasma Biomarkers Reflecting Profibrotic Processes in Heart Failure With a Preserved Ejection Fraction: Data From the Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB on Management of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Study. Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Jan; 9(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.510
  3. Global Differences in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The PARAGON-HF Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2021 04; 14(4):e007901.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  4. Cardiac and Noncardiac Disease Burden and Treatment Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan: Insights From a Combined PARAGON-HF and PARADIGM-HF Analysis. Circ Heart Fail. 2021 03; 14(3):e008052.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  5. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Insights From PARADIGM-HF. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 02 16; 10(4):e019238.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.181
  6. Serum uric acid, influence of sacubitril-valsartan, and cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PARAGON-HF. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 11; 22(11):2093-2101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  7. Serum potassium in the PARADIGM-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 11; 22(11):2056-2064.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  8. Sacubitril/Valsartan and Sudden Cardiac Death According to Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Use and Heart?Failure Cause: A PARADIGM-HF Analysis. JACC Heart Fail. 2020 10; 8(10):844-855.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  9. Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Biomarkers of Extracellular Matrix Regulation in Patients With HFpEF. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 08 04; 76(5):503-514.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  10. Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Women Compared With Men With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From PARAGON-HF. Circulation. 2020 02 04; 141(5):338-351.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  11. Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019 10 24; 381(17):1609-1620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  12. Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Biomarkers of Extracellular Matrix Regulation in Patients?With HFrEF. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 02 26; 73(7):795-806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  13. Baseline Characteristics of Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction in the PARAGON-HF Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2018 07; 11(7):e004962.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  14. Independent Prognostic Value of Serum Soluble ST2 Measurements in Patients With Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction in the PARADIGM-HF Trial (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure). Circ Heart Fail. 2018 05; 11(5):e004446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  15. Effect of neprilysin inhibition on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic heart failure who are receiving target doses of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system: a secondary analysis of the PARADIGM-HF trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 07; 6(7):547-554.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  16. Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in PARADIGM-HF. Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Aug; 10(8).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  17. Effect of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril on glycaemic control in patients with heart failure and diabetes: a post-hoc analysis from the PARADIGM-HF trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 05; 5(5):333-340.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  18. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Enalapril in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. JAMA Cardiol. 2016 09 01; 1(6):666-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  19. Urinary cGMP (Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate)/BNP (B-Type Natriuretic Peptide) Ratio, Sacubitril/Valsartan, and Outcomes in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2023 03; 16(3):e010111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  20. Sacubitril/Valsartan and Frailty in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 09 20; 80(12):1130-1143.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  21. Effects of sacubitril/valsartan on glycemia in patients with diabetes and heart failure: the PARAGON-HF and PARADIGM-HF trials. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 06 18; 21(1):110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  22. Atrial Fibrillation in Heart?Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The PARAGON-HF Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2022 05; 10(5):336-346.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  23. Natriuretic peptide-based inclusion criteria in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction clinical trials: insights from PARAGON-HF. Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 04; 24(4):672-677.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  24. Effect of sacubitril/valsartan on investigator-reported ventricular arrhythmias in PARADIGM-HF. Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 03; 24(3):551-561.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  25. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition and renal outcomes across the spectrum of ejection fraction in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 09; 24(9):1591-1598.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  26. Sacubitril-valsartan as a treatment for apparent resistant hypertension in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J. 2021 09 21; 42(36):3741-3752.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  27. Integrating High-Sensitivity Troponin T and?Sacubitril/Valsartan Treatment in?HFpEF: The PARAGON-HF Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2021 09; 9(9):627-635.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  28. Influence of study discontinuation during the run-in period on the estimated efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in the PARAGON-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 12; 23(12):2085-2090.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  29. Effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril on changes in heart failure therapies over time: the PARADIGM-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 09; 23(9):1518-1524.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  30. Treatment Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Valsartan by Ejection Fraction in Patients With Recent Hospitalization. J Card Fail. 2021 09; 27(9):1027-1030.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  31. Serum potassium and outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a post-hoc analysis of the PARAGON-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 05; 23(5):776-784.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  32. Acute pulmonary pressure change after transition to sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction. ESC Heart Fail. 2021 04; 8(2):1706-1710.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  33. Reply: Circulating Biomarkers Specific to Myocardial Extracellular Matrix Are Required to Embrace the Heterogeneity of HFpEF. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 11 17; 76(20):2417-2418.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  34. Liver function and prognosis, and influence of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 09; 22(9):1662-1671.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  35. Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Heart?Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2020 05; 8(5):372-381.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  36. Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor Therapy Reverses Pulmonary Hypertension in End-Stage Heart Failure Patients Awaiting Transplantation. Circ Heart Fail. 2020 02; 13(2):e006696.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  37. Echocardiographic Features of Patients?With Heart?Failure and Preserved?Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 12 10; 74(23):2858-2873.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  38. Sacubitril/Valsartan Across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction in Heart Failure. Circulation. 2020 02 04; 141(5):352-361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  39. Health-Related Quality of Life in Heart?Failure With Preserved Ejection?Fraction: The PARAGON-HF Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2019 10; 7(10):862-874.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  40. Outcomes and Effect of Treatment According to Etiology in HFrEF: An Analysis of PARADIGM-HF. JACC Heart Fail. 2019 06; 7(6):457-465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  41. B-Type Natriuretic Peptide During Treatment With Sacubitril/Valsartan: The?PARADIGM-HF?Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 03 26; 73(11):1264-1272.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  42. Reduced loop diuretic use in patients taking sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril: the PARADIGM-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 03; 21(3):337-341.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  43. Estimated 5-Year Number Needed to Treat to Prevent Cardiovascular Death or Heart Failure Hospitalization With Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition vs Standard Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of Data From the PARADIGM-HF Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2018 12 01; 3(12):1226-1231.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  44. IGFBP7 (Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-7) and Neprilysin Inhibition in Patients With Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2018 10; 11(10):e005133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  45. Growth differentiation factor-15 is not modified by sacubitril/valsartan and is an independent marker of risk in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: the PARADIGM-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 12; 20(12):1701-1709.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  46. Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Physical and Social Activity Limitations in Patients With Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2018 06 01; 3(6):498-505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  47. Renal Effects and Associated Outcomes During Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2018 06; 6(6):489-498.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  48. Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes Associated With Hypotensive Episodes Among Heart Failure Patients Receiving Sacubitril/Valsartan or Enalapril: The PARADIGM-HF Trial (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure). Circ Heart Fail. 2018 04; 11(4):e004745.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  49. Effect of sacubitril/valsartan on recurrent events in the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial (PARADIGM-HF). Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 04; 20(4):760-768.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  50. Prognostic Value of N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels in Heart Failure Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation. Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Oct; 10(10).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  51. Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition?in Heart Failure With Preserved?Ejection Fraction: Rationale and Design of the PARAGON-HF Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2017 07; 5(7):471-482.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  52. Systolic blood pressure, cardiovascular outcomes and efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: results from PARADIGM-HF. Eur Heart J. 2017 04 14; 38(15):1132-1143.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  53. The effects of sacubitril/valsartan on coronary outcomes in PARADIGM-HF. Am Heart J. 2017 Jun; 188:35-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  54. Reduced Risk of Hyperkalemia During Treatment of Heart Failure With Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists by Use of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Enalapril: A Secondary Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2017 01 01; 2(1):79-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  55. Dementia-related adverse events in PARADIGM-HF and other trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 01; 19(1):129-137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  56. Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan in the PARADIGM-HF Trial (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) According to Background Therapy. Circ Heart Fail. 2016 09; 9(9).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  57. Influence of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696)?on?30-Day Readmission After Heart Failure Hospitalization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 07 19; 68(3):241-248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  58. Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan Relative to?a Prior Decompensation: The PARADIGM-HF Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2016 10; 4(10):816-822.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  59. Efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril at lower than target doses in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the PARADIGM-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Oct; 18(10):1228-1234.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  60. Factors Associated With Noncompletion During the Run-In Period Before Randomization and Influence on the Estimated Benefit of LCZ696 in the PARADIGM-HF Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2016 06; 9(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  61. Importance of Clinical Worsening of Heart Failure Treated in the Outpatient Setting: Evidence From the Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure Trial (PARADIGM-HF). Circulation. 2016 Jun 07; 133(23):2254-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  62. Influence of Ejection Fraction on Outcomes and Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: The Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Mar; 9(3):e002744.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  63. Risk Related to Pre-Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetes Mellitus in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights From Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Jan; 9(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  64. Estimating the Long-Term Treatment Benefits of Sacubitril-Valsartan. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 03; 373(23):2289-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  65. Comparing LCZ696 with enalapril according to baseline risk using the MAGGIC and EMPHASIS-HF risk scores: an analysis of mortality and morbidity in PARADIGM-HF. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Nov 10; 66(19):2059-2071.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  66. Efficacy and safety of LCZ696 (sacubitril-valsartan) according to age: insights from PARADIGM-HF. Eur Heart J. 2015 Oct 07; 36(38):2576-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  67. Effect of the angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 compared with enalapril on mode of death in heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2015 Aug 07; 36(30):1990-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  68. A putative placebo analysis of the effects of LCZ696 on clinical outcomes in heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2015 Feb 14; 36(7):434-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  69. Renal effects of the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 May; 17(5):510-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  70. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition compared with enalapril on the risk of clinical progression in surviving patients with heart failure. Circulation. 2015 Jan 06; 131(1):54-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  71. Elevation in high-sensitivity troponin T in heart failure and preserved ejection fraction and influence of treatment with the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696. Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Nov; 7(6):953-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  72. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11; 371(11):993-1004.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  73. Baseline characteristics and treatment of patients in prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to determine impact on global mortality and morbidity in heart failure trial (PARADIGM-HF). Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Jul; 16(7):817-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  74. Independence of the blood pressure lowering effect and efficacy of the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, LCZ696, in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an analysis of the PARAMOUNT trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Jun; 16(6):671-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  75. Impaired systolic function by strain imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 11; 63(5):447-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  76. Dual angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibition as an alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: rationale for and design of the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial (PARADIGM-HF). Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Sep; 15(9):1062-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  77. The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a phase 2 double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 Oct 20; 380(9851):1387-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  78. Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade and antihypertensive drugs on diastolic function in patients with hypertension and diastolic dysfunction: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007 Jun 23; 369(9579):2079-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  79. Rationale and design: the VALsartan In Diastolic Dysfunction (VALIDD) Trial: evolving the management of diastolic dysfunction in hypertension. Am Heart J. 2006 Aug; 152(2):246-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.