Connection

Kenneth Cummings to Harm Reduction

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Kenneth Cummings has written about Harm Reduction.
Connection Strength

1.077
  1. Estimating demand for alternatives to cigarettes with online purchase tasks. Am J Health Behav. 2014 Jan; 38(1):103-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.441
  2. Tobacco risk perceptions and behavior: implications for tobacco control. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Dec; 6 Suppl 3:S285-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.235
  3. Prevalence and Correlates of the Belief That Electronic Cigarettes are a Lot Less Harmful Than Conventional Cigarettes Under the Different Regulatory Environments of Australia and the United Kingdom. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Feb; 19(2):258-263.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  4. How did UK cigarette makers reduce tar to 10 mg or less? BMJ. 2006 Feb 04; 332(7536):302.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  5. A longitudinal assessment of the impact of smoke-free worksite policies on tobacco use. Am J Public Health. 2005 Jun; 95(6):1024-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  6. Estimating the Impact of Tobacco Parity and Harm Reduction Tax Proposals Using the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 07 23; 18(15).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  7. Examining the relationship of vaping to smoking initiation among US youth and young adults: a reality check. Tob Control. 2019 11; 28(6):629-635.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  8. Validation of a Measure of Normative Beliefs About Smokeless Tobacco Use. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May; 18(5):801-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  9. Do smokers want to know more about the cigarettes they smoke? Results from the EDUCATE study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Dec; 6 Suppl 3:S289-302.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  10. Stop-smoking medications: who uses them, who misuses them, and who is misinformed about them? Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Dec; 6 Suppl 3:S303-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.