Connection

Richard Bayer to Coronary Angiography

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Richard Bayer has written about Coronary Angiography.
Richard Bayer
Connection Strength
3.803
Coronary Angiography
  1. Noninvasive Derivation of Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Review. J Thorac Imaging. 2018 Mar; 33(2):88-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.427
  2. Coronary CT Fractional Flow Reserve before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Clinical Outcomes. Radiology. 2022 01; 302(1):50-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  3. Non-invasive fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) in the evaluation of acute chest pain - Concepts and first experiences. Eur J Radiol. 2021 May; 138:109633.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  4. Ischemia and outcome prediction by cardiac CT based machine learning. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec; 36(12):2429-2439.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  5. More holes, more contrast? Comparing an 18-gauge non-fenestrated catheter with a 22-gauge fenestrated catheter for cardiac CT. PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0234311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  6. Impact of machine learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography fractional flow reserve on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov; 30(11):5841-5851.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  7. In-Hospital Cost Comparison of Triple-Rule-Out Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Acute Chest Pain. J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May; 35(3):198-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  8. CT FFR for Ischemia-Specific CAD With?a?New Computational Fluid Dynamics Algorithm: A Chinese Multicenter Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 04; 13(4):980-990.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  9. Influence of Coronary Calcium on Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning CT-FFR: Results From MACHINE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 03; 13(3):760-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  10. Impact of Coronary Computerized Tomography Angiography-Derived Plaque Quantification and Machine-Learning Computerized Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve on Adverse Cardiac Outcome. Am J Cardiol. 2019 11 01; 124(9):1340-1348.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  11. Relationship Between Pregnancy Complications and Subsequent Coronary Artery Disease Assessed by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Black Women. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 07; 12(7):e008754.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  12. Coronary CT angiography-derived plaque quantification with artificial intelligence CT fractional flow reserve for the identification of lesion-specific ischemia. Eur Radiol. 2019 May; 29(5):2378-2387.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  13. Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Machine Learning Algorithm versus Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling. Radiology. 2018 Jul; 288(1):64-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  14. Diagnostic accuracy of low and high tube voltage coronary CT angiography using an X-ray tube potential-tailored contrast medium injection protocol. Eur Radiol. 2018 May; 28(5):2134-2142.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  15. Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve. Radiology. 2017 10; 285(1):17-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  16. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Therapeutic Decision Making. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15; 120(12):2121-2127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  17. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Machine Learning for Risk Stratification of Non-Culprit Coronary Narrowings in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15; 120(8):1260-1266.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  18. CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration using iterative beam-hardening calcium correction reconstruction. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jun; 91:29-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  19. Correlation and predictive value of aortic root calcification markers with coronary artery calcification and obstructive coronary artery disease. Radiol Med. 2017 Feb; 122(2):113-120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  20. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using 3rd-generation dual-source CT and automated tube voltage selection: Clinical application in a non-obese and obese patient population. Eur Radiol. 2017 Jun; 27(6):2298-2308.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  21. Prognostic implications of coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Nov - Dec; 10(6):458-465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  22. Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Sep-Oct; 10(5):377-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  23. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 May-Jun; 10(3):199-206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  24. Image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70?kVp in a clinical setting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2016 Mar; 26(3):797-806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  25. Diagnostic value of quantitative stenosis predictors with coronary CT angiography compared to invasive fractional flow reserve. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Aug; 84(8):1509-1515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  26. Computed tomography imaging of coronary artery plaque: characterization and prognosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Mar; 53(2):307-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  27. Coronary computed tomographic angiography in clinical practice: state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Mar; 53(2):287-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  28. Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve measurements--initial experience with a novel physician-driven algorithm. Eur Radiol. 2015 Apr; 25(4):1201-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  29. Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 01; 114(9):1303-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  30. Incremental value of pharmacological stress cardiac dual-energy CT over coronary CT angiography alone for the assessment of coronary artery disease in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jul; 203(1):W70-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  31. Impact of machine-learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve on decision-making in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Eur Radiol. 2022 Sep; 32(9):6008-6016.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  32. One-year outcomes of CCTA alone versus machine learning-based FFRCT for coronary artery disease: a single-center, prospective study. Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug; 32(8):5179-5188.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  33. Visualization of Concurrent Epicardial and Microvascular Coronary Artery Disease in a Patient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Feb 01; 31(1):3-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  34. Additive value of epicardial adipose tissue quantification to coronary CT angiography-derived plaque characterization and CT fractional flow reserve for the prediction of lesion-specific ischemia. Eur Radiol. 2022 Jun; 32(6):4243-4252.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  35. Prognostic value of epicardial adipose tissue volume in combination with coronary plaque and flow assessment for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events. Eur J Radiol. 2022 Mar; 148:110157.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  36. The Feasibility, Tolerability, Safety, and Accuracy of Low-radiation Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Regadenoson Compared With Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography. J Thorac Imaging. 2021 Nov 01; 36(6):345-352.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  37. Feasibility and prognostic role of machine learning-based FFRCT in patients with stent implantation. Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep; 31(9):6592-6604.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  38. Gender differences in the diagnostic performance of machine learning coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve -results from the MACHINE registry. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Oct; 119:108657.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  39. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Plaque Quantification in Patients With Acute Coronary?Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2017 03 01; 119(5):712-718.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  40. Dual-source CT imaging to plan transcatheter aortic valve replacement: accuracy for diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2015 Apr; 275(1):80-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.