Connection

Badih Elmunzer to Risk Factors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Badih Elmunzer has written about Risk Factors.
Connection Strength

0.612
  1. The Impact of Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Complicated Gallstone Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct; 112(10):1596-1602.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  2. Combination pharmacoprophylaxis for post-ERCP pancreatitis: working toward an evidence base. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 05; 85(5):1014-1016.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  3. Rectal indomethacin alone versus indomethacin and prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for preventing pancreatitis after ERCP: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 03 03; 17(1):120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  4. Preventing Postendoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015 Oct; 25(4):725-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  5. Does rectal indomethacin eliminate the need for prophylactic pancreatic stent placement in patients undergoing high-risk ERCP? Post hoc efficacy and cost-benefit analyses using prospective clinical trial data. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar; 108(3):410-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  6. Clinical yield of diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in orthotopic liver transplant recipients with suspected biliary complications. Liver Transpl. 2012 Dec; 18(12):1479-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  7. A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 12; 366(15):1414-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  8. Long-Term Quality of Life Following Endoscopic Therapy Compared to Esophagectomy for Neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus. Dig Dis Sci. 2021 05; 66(5):1580-1587.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  9. Rectal indometacin dose escalation for prevention of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in high-risk patients: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 02; 5(2):132-141.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  10. Racial Disparities and Trends in Pancreatic Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 01; 18(1):171-178.e10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  11. [Simple ways of reducing the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2019 Apr 15; 181(16).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  12. Clip Closure Prevents Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Large Colon Polyps in a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology. 2019 10; 157(4):977-984.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  13. The revised Atlanta criteria more accurately reflect severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis compared to the consensus criteria. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 05; 7(4):557-564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  14. Adverse Events and Reinterventions Following Pancreatic Endoscopic Sphincterotomy. Pancreas. 2018 08; 47(7):880-883.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  15. Specialist Endoscopists Are Associated with a Decreased Risk of Incomplete Polyp Resection During Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Colon. Dig Dis Sci. 2017 09; 62(9):2464-2471.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  16. The risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and the protective effect of rectal indomethacin in cases of attempted but unsuccessful prophylactic pancreatic stent placement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan; 81(1):150-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  17. Machine learning algorithms outperform conventional regression models in predicting development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov; 108(11):1723-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  18. Prophylactic 5-Fr pancreatic duct stents are superior to 3-Fr stents: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2011 Apr; 43(4):325-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.