Connection

Gary Amy to Membranes, Artificial

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Gary Amy has written about Membranes, Artificial.
Gary Amy
Connection Strength
5.080
Membranes, Artificial
  1. Irreversible membrane fouling abatement through pre-deposited layer of hierarchical porous carbons. Water Res. 2014 Nov 15; 65:245-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.439
  2. Osmotically driven membrane process for the management of urban runoff in coastal regions. Water Res. 2014 Jan 01; 48:200-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.414
  3. Flux patterns and membrane fouling propensity during desalination of seawater by forward osmosis. Water Res. 2012 Jan 01; 46(1):195-204.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.363
  4. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane. Water Res. 2011 Dec 15; 45(20):6737-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.362
  5. Critical flux and chemical cleaning-in-place during the long-term operation of a pilot-scale submerged membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2011 Jan; 45(2):863-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.336
  6. Characterization of soluble microbial products and their fouling impacts in membrane bioreactors. Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Sep 01; 44(17):6642-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.334
  7. Solute transport model for trace organic neutral and charged compounds through nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Water Res. 2007 Sep; 41(17):3977-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.267
  8. Role of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane fouling and flux decline. Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Feb 01; 40(3):969-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.244
  9. Correlation between membrane fouling and soluble/colloidal organic substances in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol. 2005; 51(6-7):1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  10. Predicting membrane flux decline from complex mixtures using flow-field flow fractionation measurements and semi-empirical theory. Water Sci Technol. 2005; 51(6-7):85-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  11. Removal and biotransformation pathway of antibiotic sulfamethoxazole from municipal wastewater treatment by anaerobic membrane bioreactor. J Hazard Mater. 2019 12 15; 380:120894.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  12. An Effective Design of Electrically Conducting Thin-Film Composite (TFC) Membranes for Bio and Organic Fouling Control in Forward Osmosis (FO). Environ Sci Technol. 2016 10 04; 50(19):10596-10605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  13. A novel integrated thermal-/membrane-based solar energy-driven hybrid desalination system: Concept description and simulation results. Water Res. 2016 09 01; 100:7-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  14. Graphene-Coated Hollow Fiber Membrane as the Cathode in Anaerobic Electrochemical Membrane Bioreactors--Effect of Configuration and Applied Voltage on Performance and Membrane Fouling. Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Apr 19; 50(8):4439-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  15. Membrane fouling and anti-fouling strategies using RO retentate from a municipal water recycling plant as the feed for osmotic power generation. Water Res. 2016 Jan 01; 88:144-155.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  16. A novel anaerobic electrochemical membrane bioreactor (AnEMBR) with conductive hollow-fiber membrane for treatment of low-organic strength solutions. Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Nov 04; 48(21):12833-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  17. Comparison of the modeling approach between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge processes. Water Environ Res. 2009 Apr; 81(4):432-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  18. Influence of solute-membrane affinity on rejection of uncharged organic solutes by nanofiltration membranes. Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Apr 01; 43(7):2400-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  19. Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds and endocrine disrupting compounds by clean and fouled nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 2009 May; 43(9):2349-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  20. Influence of electrostatic interactions on the rejection with NF and assessment of the removal efficiency during NF/GAC treatment of pharmaceutically active compounds in surface water. Water Res. 2007 Aug; 41(15):3227-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  21. Identification of nanofiltration membrane foulants. Water Res. 2007 Sep; 41(17):3936-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  22. Low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) fouling associated with allochthonous versus autochthonous natural organic matter. Water Res. 2006 Jul; 40(12):2357-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  23. Transport of target anions, chromate (Cr (VI)), arsenate (As (V)), and perchlorate (ClO4-), through RO, NF, and UF membranes. Water Sci Technol. 2005; 51(6-7):327-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  24. Rejection of trace organic compounds by high-pressure membranes. Water Sci Technol. 2005; 51(6-7):335-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  25. Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM). Water Res. 2004 Dec; 38(20):4511-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  26. Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. Water Res. 2004 Aug-Sep; 38(14-15):3431-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  27. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment--a literature review. Water Res. 2004 Jul; 38(12):2795-809.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  28. Organic colloids and their influence on low-pressure membrane filtration. Water Sci Technol. 2004; 50(12):311-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  29. Inhibition of biofouling on reverse osmosis membrane surfaces by germicidal ultraviolet light side-emitting optical fibers. Water Res. 2022 Oct 01; 224:119094.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  30. Cleaning strategies for flux recovery of an ultrafiltration membrane fouled by natural organic matter. Water Res. 2001 Oct; 35(14):3301-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  31. Osmotically and Thermally Isolated Forward Osmosis-Membrane Distillation (FO-MD) Integrated Module. Environ Sci Technol. 2019 04 02; 53(7):3488-3498.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  32. Forward osmosis for oily wastewater reclamation: Multi-charged oxalic acid complexes as draw solutes. Water Res. 2017 10 01; 122:580-590.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  33. Organic micropollutants in aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors: Changes in microbial communities and gene expression. Bioresour Technol. 2016 Oct; 218:882-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  34. Transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) removal efficiency by a combination of coagulation and ultrafiltration to minimize SWRO membrane fouling. Water Res. 2016 10 01; 102:485-493.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  35. Life cycle cost of a hybrid forward osmosis - low pressure reverse osmosis system for seawater desalination and wastewater recovery. Water Res. 2016 Jan 01; 88:225-234.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  36. Sustainable organic loading rate and energy recovery potential of mesophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2014 Aug; 166:326-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  37. Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes. Water Res. 2012 Mar 15; 46(4):1318-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  38. Fouling control mechanisms of demineralized water backwash: Reduction of charge screening and calcium bridging effects. Water Res. 2011 Dec 01; 45(19):6289-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  39. Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2006 Feb; 40(4):710-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  40. Characterizing algogenic organic matter (AOM) and evaluating associated NF membrane fouling. Water Res. 2004 Mar; 38(6):1427-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.