Connection

Erik Svendsen to Disaster Planning

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Erik Svendsen has written about Disaster Planning.
Connection Strength

1.538
  1. Engaging a chemical disaster community: lessons from Graniteville. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 27; 11(6):5684-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.411
  2. Long-term impact of environmental public health disaster on health system performance: experiences from the Graniteville, South Carolina chlorine spill. South Med J. 2013 Jan; 106(1):74-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.373
  3. Designing and executing a functional exercise to test a novel informatics tool for mass casualty triage. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 10 01; 26(10):1091-1098.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  4. Population Health Adaptation Approaches to the Increasing Severity and Frequency of Weather-Related Disasters Resulting From our Changing Climate: A Literature Review and Application to Charleston, South Carolina. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018 12; 5(4):439-452.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  5. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report: Chemical Inhalational Disasters. Biology of Lung Injury, Development of Novel Therapeutics, and Medical Preparedness. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Jun; 14(6):1060-1072.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  6. Risk Communication Strategies: Lessons Learned from Previous Disasters with a Focus on the Fukushima Radiation Accident. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2016 12; 3(4):348-359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  7. Radiation occupational health interventions offered to radiation workers in response to the complex catastrophic disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. J Radiat Res. 2015 May; 56(3):413-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  8. GRACE: public health recovery methods following an environmental disaster. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2010 Apr-Jun; 65(2):77-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  9. Validation of a novel irritant gas syndrome triage algorithm. Am J Disaster Med. 2018; 13(1):13-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.