Connection

Kenneth Catchpole to Robotic Surgical Procedures

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Kenneth Catchpole has written about Robotic Surgical Procedures.
Kenneth Catchpole
Connection Strength
7.148
Robotic Surgical Procedures
  1. A Novel Approach for Engagement in Team Training in High-Technology Surgery: The Robotic-Assisted Surgery Olympics. J Patient Saf. 2022 09 01; 18(6):570-577.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.775
  2. Addressing misconceptions of flow disruption studies in "Is non-stop always better? Examining assumptions behind the concept of flow disruptions in studies of robot-assisted surgery". J Robot Surg. 2022 Aug; 16(4):989-990.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.736
  3. Room Size Influences Flow in Robotic-Assisted Surgery. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 07 28; 18(15).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.726
  4. Barriers to safety and efficiency in robotic surgery docking. Surg Endosc. 2022 01; 36(1):206-215.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.700
  5. Human factors in robotic assisted surgery: Lessons from studies 'in the Wild'. Appl Ergon. 2019 Jul; 78:270-276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.573
  6. Associations of Intraoperative Flow Disruptions and Operating Room Teamwork During Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Urology. 2018 04; 114:105-113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.570
  7. Surgical flow disruptions during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2017 Jun; 24(3):8814-8821.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.544
  8. Diagnosing barriers to safety and efficiency in robotic surgery. Ergonomics. 2018 Jan; 61(1):26-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.536
  9. Barriers to efficiency in robotic surgery: the resident effect. J Surg Res. 2016 10; 205(2):296-304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.511
  10. Safety, efficiency and learning curves in robotic surgery: a human factors analysis. Surg Endosc. 2016 09; 30(9):3749-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.492
  11. The Application of Human Factors Engineering to Reduce Operating Room Turnover in Robotic Surgery. World J Surg. 2022 06; 46(6):1300-1307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  12. RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings. Surg Endosc. 2022 03; 36(3):1916-1926.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  13. Work-system interventions in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review exploring the gap between challenges and solutions. Surg Endosc. 2021 05; 35(5):1976-1989.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  14. Flow disruptions in robotic-assisted abdominal sacrocolpopexy: does robotic surgery introduce unforeseen challenges for gynecologic surgeons? Int Urogynecol J. 2019 12; 30(12):2177-2182.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  15. Effects of Flow Disruptions on Mental Workload and Surgical Performance in Robotic-Assisted Surgery. World J Surg. 2018 11; 42(11):3599-3607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  16. Reducing Operating Room Turnover Time for Robotic Surgery Using a Motor Racing Pit Stop Model. World J Surg. 2017 08; 41(8):1943-1949.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.