Robert Grubb to Magnetic Resonance Imaging
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Robert Grubb has written about Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Connection Strength
0.472
-
Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provides Limited Incremental Value Over the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Preradical Prostatectomy Nomogram. Urology. 2018 03; 113:119-128.
Score: 0.079
-
Determination of the Role of Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate in Clinical Practice: Is Biopsy Still Necessary? Urology. 2017 04; 102:190-197.
Score: 0.073
-
Evaluation of 3 T pelvic MRI imaging in prostate cancer patients receiving post-prostatectomy IMRT. World J Urol. 2015 Jan; 33(1):69-75.
Score: 0.061
-
Accuracy analysis in MRI-guided robotic prostate biopsy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013 Nov; 8(6):937-44.
Score: 0.057
-
Preoperative sensorimotor mapping in brain tumor patients using spontaneous fluctuations in neuronal activity imaged with functional magnetic resonance imaging: initial experience. Neurosurgery. 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):226-36.
Score: 0.045
-
Patient selection determines the prostate cancer yield of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-guided transrectal biopsies in a closed 3-Tesla scanner. BJU Int. 2008 Jan; 101(2):181-5.
Score: 0.039
-
Magnetic resonance imaging-directed transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies in patients at risk of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2007 May; 99(5):1041-6.
Score: 0.038
-
An interventional magnetic resonance imaging technique for the molecular characterization of intraprostatic dynamic contrast enhancement. Mol Imaging. 2005 Jan-Mar; 4(1):63-6.
Score: 0.032
-
Transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis associated with hypercalcemia in a patient with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Urology. 2004 Apr; 63(4):778-80.
Score: 0.031
-
Final Results of a Phase I/II Multicenter Trial of WST11 Vascular Targeted Photodynamic Therapy for Hemi-Ablation of the Prostate in Men with Unilateral Low Risk Prostate Cancer Performed in the United States. J Urol. 2016 Oct; 196(4):1096-104.
Score: 0.018