Connection

Nir Menachemi to Medical Records Systems, Computerized

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Nir Menachemi has written about Medical Records Systems, Computerized.
  1. Predictors of physician satisfaction among electronic health record system users. J Healthc Qual. 2010 Jan-Feb; 32(1):35-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.307
  2. The relationship between local hospital IT capabilities and physician EMR adoption. J Med Syst. 2009 Oct; 33(5):329-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.302
  3. The use of information technologies among rural and urban physicians in Florida. J Med Syst. 2007 Dec; 31(6):483-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.266
  4. Incomplete EHR adoption: late uptake of patient safety and cost control functions. Am J Med Qual. 2007 Sep-Oct; 22(5):319-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.261
  5. The relationship between pediatric volume and information technology adoption in hospitals. Qual Manag Health Care. 2007 Apr-Jun; 16(2):146-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.254
  6. The influence of payer mix on electronic health record adoption by physicians. Health Care Manage Rev. 2007 Apr-Jun; 32(2):111-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.254
  7. Charting the use of electronic health records and other information technologies among child health providers. BMC Pediatr. 2006 Jul 25; 6:21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.242
  8. Proliferation of electronic health records among obstetrician-gynecologists. Qual Manag Health Care. 2006 Jul-Sep; 15(3):150-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.241
  9. Reviewing the benefits and costs of electronic health records and associated patient safety technologies. J Med Syst. 2006 Jun; 30(3):159-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.240
  10. Examining the adoption of electronic health records and personal digital assistants by family physicians in Florida. Inform Prim Care. 2006; 14(1):1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  11. EHR and other IT adoption among physicians: results of a large-scale statewide analysis. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2006; 20(3):79-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  12. Barriers to ambulatory EHR: who are 'imminent adopters' and how do they differ from other physicians? Inform Prim Care. 2006; 14(2):101-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  13. Information technologies in Florida's rural hospitals: does system affiliation matter? J Rural Health. 2005; 21(3):263-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.217
  14. Adoption factors associated with patient safety-related information technology. J Healthc Qual. 2004 Nov-Dec; 26(6):39-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.215
  15. The role of information technology usage in physician practice satisfaction. Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Oct-Dec; 34(4):364-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  16. Resistance is futile: but it is slowing the pace of EHR adoption nonetheless. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 May-Jun; 16(3):274-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  17. Market effects on electronic health record adoption by physicians. Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Jul-Sep; 33(3):243-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  18. Predicting the adoption of electronic health records by physicians: when will health care be paperless? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb; 13(1):106-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  19. An analysis of IT adoption and utilization by physicians serving children in Florida. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 950.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  20. A critical appraisal of guidelines for electronic communication between patients and clinicians: the need to modernize current recommendations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 04 01; 25(4):413-418.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  21. Diffusion of information technology supporting the Institute of Medicine's quality chasm care aims. J Healthc Qual. 2005 Jan-Feb; 27(1):24-32, 39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.