Connection

Rozemarijn Vliegenthart to Coronary Artery Disease

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Rozemarijn Vliegenthart has written about Coronary Artery Disease.
Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Connection Strength
10.594
Coronary Artery Disease
  1. Coronary calcium scoring as first-line test to detect and exclude coronary artery disease in patients presenting to the general practitioner with stable chest pain: protocol of the cluster-randomised CONCRETE trial. BMJ Open. 2022 04 19; 12(4):e055123.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.519
  2. The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Coronary Calcium Scoring in?Stable Chest Pain Patients: A Narrative Review. Rofo. 2022 Mar; 194(3):257-265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.511
  3. Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Coronary Calcification in a Middle-aged Dutch Population: The ImaLife Study. J Thorac Imaging. 2021 May 01; 36(3):174-180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.485
  4. Focal pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation is related to plaque presence, plaque type, and stenosis severity in coronary CTA. Eur Radiol. 2021 Oct; 31(10):7251-7261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.484
  5. Coronary Artery Calcium and Cognitive Function in Dutch Adults: Cross-Sectional Results of the Population-Based ImaLife Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 02 16; 10(4):e018172.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.477
  6. High-pitch dual-source CT for coronary artery calcium scoring: A head-to-head comparison of non-triggered chest versus triggered cardiac acquisition. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021 Jan-Feb; 15(1):65-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.454
  7. Machine Learning and Deep Neural Networks Applications in Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Perfusion. J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May; 35 Suppl 1:S58-S65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.453
  8. Early imaging biomarkers of lung cancer, COPD and coronary artery disease in the general population: rationale and design of the ImaLife (Imaging in Lifelines) Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Jan; 35(1):75-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.422
  9. Coronary artery calcium quantification on first, second and third generation dual source CT: A comparison study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Nov; 11(6):444-448.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.377
  10. Dose reduction techniques in coronary calcium scoring: The effect of iterative reconstruction combined with low tube voltage on calcium scores in a thoracic phantom. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Aug; 93:229-235.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.370
  11. Feasibility of spectral shaping for detection and quantification of coronary calcifications in ultra-low dose CT. Eur Radiol. 2017 May; 27(5):2047-2054.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.351
  12. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging identifies early perfusion abnormalities in diabetes and hypertension: Insights from a multicenter registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug; 10(4):301-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.345
  13. Expert opinion: How and when to perform CT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Thorac Imaging. 2015 May; 30(3):167-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.320
  14. The dream of a one-stop-shop: Meta-analysis on myocardial perfusion CT. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Dec; 84(12):2411-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.313
  15. Validation and prognosis of coronary artery calcium scoring in nontriggered thoracic computed tomography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jul; 6(4):514-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.281
  16. Dual-energy CT of the heart. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov; 199(5 Suppl):S54-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.269
  17. Non-invasive assessment of coronary calcification. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004; 19(12):1063-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  18. Quality and safety of coronary computed tomography angiography at academic and non-academic sites: insights from a large European registry (ESCR MR/CT Registry). Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug; 32(8):5246-5255.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  19. FFRCT and QFR: Ready to be used in clinical decision making? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022 Jul-Aug; 16(4):343-344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  20. Early detection of obstructive coronary artery disease in the asymptomatic high-risk population: objectives and study design of the EARLY-SYNERGY trial. Am Heart J. 2022 04; 246:166-177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  21. Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion CT for the Detection of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 01; 15(1):75-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  22. Screening for cardiovascular disease risk using traditional risk factor assessment or coronary artery calcium scoring: the ROBINSCA trial. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 10 20; 21(11):1216-1224.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  23. Deep learning for automated exclusion of cardiac CT examinations negative for coronary artery calcium. Eur J Radiol. 2020 Aug; 129:109114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  24. Assessment of Dynamic Change of Coronary Artery Geometry and Its Relationship to Coronary Artery Disease, Based on Coronary CT Angiography. J Digit Imaging. 2020 04; 33(2):480-489.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  25. Relationship Between Pregnancy Complications and Subsequent Coronary Artery Disease Assessed by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Black Women. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 07; 12(7):e008754.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  26. T1 reactivity as an imaging biomarker in myocardial tissue characterization discriminating normal, ischemic and infarcted myocardium. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul; 35(7):1319-1325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  27. Automated plaque analysis for the prognostication of major adverse cardiac events. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jul; 116:76-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  28. Intermodel disagreement of myocardial blood flow estimation from dynamic CT perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jan; 110:175-180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  29. Quantitative myocardial perfusion evaluation with positron emission tomography and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review of prognostic studies. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 10 01; 19(10):1179-1187.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  30. The impact of dose reduction on the quantification of coronary artery calcifications and risk categorization: A systematic review. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 Sep - Oct; 12(5):352-363.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  31. Imaging the myocardial ischemic cascade. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Aug; 34(8):1249-1263.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  32. High-pitch versus sequential mode for coronary calcium in individuals with a high heart rate: Potential for dose reduction. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 Jul - Aug; 12(4):298-304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  33. Is the coronary artery calcium score associated with acute coronary events in breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy? Radiother Oncol. 2018 01; 126(1):170-176.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  34. Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging in the ROBINSCA Trial: Rationale, Design, and Technical Background. Acad Radiol. 2018 Jan; 25(1):118-128.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  35. Coronary artery calcium in breast cancer survivors after radiation therapy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Sep; 33(9):1425-1431.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  36. Accuracy of iodine quantification using dual energy CT in latest generation dual source and dual layer CT. Eur Radiol. 2017 Sep; 27(9):3904-3912.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  37. Accuracy and Radiation Dose Reduction Using Low-Voltage Computed Tomography Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring With Tin Filtration. Am J Cardiol. 2017 02 15; 119(4):675-680.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  38. Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Sep-Oct; 10(5):377-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  39. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  40. Mammographic detection of breast arterial calcification as an independent predictor of coronary atherosclerotic disease in a single ethnic cohort of African American women. Atherosclerosis. 2015 Sep; 242(1):218-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  41. Absolute Versus Relative Myocardial Blood Flow by Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Anatomic Coronary Artery Disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul; 205(1):W67-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  42. Coronary calcium scores are systematically underestimated at a large chest size: A multivendor phantom study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Sep-Oct; 9(5):415-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  43. Intermodel agreement of myocardial blood flow estimation from stress-rest myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in patients with coronary artery disease. Invest Radiol. 2015 Apr; 50(4):275-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  44. Quantification of coronary artery calcium in nongated CT to predict cardiovascular events in male lung cancer screening participants: results of the NELSON study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Jan-Feb; 9(1):50-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  45. Correction of lumen contrast-enhancement influence on non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque quantification on CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Feb; 31(2):429-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  46. Comparison of the effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection on cardiac CT postprocessing. Acad Radiol. 2014 Mar; 21(3):318-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  47. A practical approach to radiological evaluation of CT lung cancer screening examinations. Cancer Imaging. 2013 Sep 23; 13(3):391-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  48. Quantitative analysis of coronary plaque composition by dual-source CT in patients with acute non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction compared to patients with stable coronary artery disease correlated with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. Acad Radiol. 2013 Aug; 20(8):995-1003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  49. Impact of cardiovascular calcifications on the detrimental effect of continued smoking on cardiovascular risk in male lung cancer screening participants. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e66484.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  50. Lung cancer screening CT-based prediction of cardiovascular events. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Aug; 6(8):899-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  51. Non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque visualization on CT: effects of contrast-enhancement and lipid-content fractions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jun; 29(5):1137-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  52. Coronary calcification and the risk of heart failure in the elderly: the Rotterdam Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Sep; 5(9):874-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  53. Coronary CT angiography versus conventional cardiac angiography for therapeutic decision making in patients with high likelihood of coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2012 Nov; 265(2):385-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  54. Interplatform reproducibility of CT coronary calcium scoring software. Radiology. 2012 Oct; 265(1):70-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  55. Evaluation of newer risk markers for coronary heart disease risk classification: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 20; 156(6):438-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  56. Small calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque simulation model: minimal size and attenuation detectable by 64-MDCT and MicroCT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Apr; 28(4):843-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  57. The role of coronary artery calcification score in clinical practice. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2008 Dec 17; 8:38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  58. Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Radiol. 2008 Dec; 18(12):2785-807.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  59. Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Aug; 24(6):645-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  60. Coffee consumption and coronary calcification: the Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008 May; 28(5):1018-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  61. The influence of heart rate, slice thickness, and calcification density on calcium scores using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography: a systematic phantom study. Invest Radiol. 2007 Dec; 42(12):848-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  62. Measurement of coronary calcium scores by electron beam computed tomography or exercise testing as initial diagnostic tool in low-risk patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol. 2008 Feb; 18(2):244-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  63. Measurement of coronary calcium scores or exercise testing as initial screening tool in asymptomatic subjects with ST-T changes on the resting ECG: an evaluation study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2007 Jul 13; 7:19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  64. Aortic stiffness is associated with atherosclerosis of the coronary arteries in older adults: the Rotterdam Study. J Hypertens. 2006 Dec; 24(12):2371-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  65. Influence of scoring parameter settings on Agatston and volume scores for coronary calcification. Eur Radiol. 2005 Jan; 15(1):102-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  66. The association of Rose questionnaire angina pectoris and coronary calcification in a general population: the Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2004 Jul; 14(6):431-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  67. Prognostic value of CT-derived left atrial and left ventricular measures in patients with acute chest pain. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan; 86:163-168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  68. The female advantage in cardiovascular disease: do vascular beds contribute equally? Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Aug 15; 166(4):403-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.