Connection

Rozemarijn Vliegenthart to Coronary Angiography

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Rozemarijn Vliegenthart has written about Coronary Angiography.
Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Connection Strength
7.396
Coronary Angiography
  1. Towards reference values of pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation: impact of coronary artery and tube voltage in coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec; 30(12):6838-6846.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.474
  2. High-pitch dual-source CT for coronary artery calcium scoring: A head-to-head comparison of non-triggered chest versus triggered cardiac acquisition. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021 Jan-Feb; 15(1):65-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.468
  3. Machine Learning and Deep Neural Networks Applications in Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Perfusion. J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May; 35 Suppl 1:S58-S65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.467
  4. Coronary artery calcium quantification on first, second and third generation dual source CT: A comparison study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Nov; 11(6):444-448.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.388
  5. Validation of myocardial perfusion quantification by dynamic CT in an ex-vivo porcine heart model. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Nov; 33(11):1821-1830.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.381
  6. Analysis of myocardial perfusion parameters in an ex-vivo porcine heart model using third generation dual-source CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Mar - Apr; 11(2):141-147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.373
  7. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging identifies early perfusion abnormalities in diabetes and hypertension: Insights from a multicenter registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug; 10(4):301-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.355
  8. Expert opinion: How and when to perform CT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Thorac Imaging. 2015 May; 30(3):167-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.330
  9. The dream of a one-stop-shop: Meta-analysis on myocardial perfusion CT. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Dec; 84(12):2411-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.323
  10. Dual-energy CT of the heart. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov; 199(5 Suppl):S54-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.277
  11. Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography for stenosis detection according to calcium score: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2012 Dec; 22(12):2688-98.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.272
  12. Coronary calcification at electron-beam CT: effect of section thickness on calcium scoring in vitro and in vivo. Radiology. 2003 Nov; 229(2):520-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  13. Coronary calcium scoring as first-line test to detect and exclude coronary artery disease in patients presenting to the general practitioner with stable chest pain: protocol of the cluster-randomised CONCRETE trial. BMJ Open. 2022 04 19; 12(4):e055123.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  14. The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Coronary Calcium Scoring in?Stable Chest Pain Patients: A Narrative Review. Rofo. 2022 Mar; 194(3):257-265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  15. CAD-RADS for Patients with Acute Chest Pain: A Step in the Right Direction. Radiology. 2021 10; 301(1):91-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  16. Focal pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation is related to plaque presence, plaque type, and stenosis severity in coronary CTA. Eur Radiol. 2021 Oct; 31(10):7251-7261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  17. Relationship Between Pregnancy Complications and Subsequent Coronary Artery Disease Assessed by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Black Women. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 07; 12(7):e008754.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  18. Automated plaque analysis for the prognostication of major adverse cardiac events. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jul; 116:76-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  19. Intermodel disagreement of myocardial blood flow estimation from dynamic CT perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jan; 110:175-180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  20. The impact of dose reduction on the quantification of coronary artery calcifications and risk categorization: A systematic review. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 Sep - Oct; 12(5):352-363.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  21. High-pitch versus sequential mode for coronary calcium in individuals with a high heart rate: Potential for dose reduction. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 Jul - Aug; 12(4):298-304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  22. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Therapeutic Decision Making. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15; 120(12):2121-2127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  23. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Machine Learning for Risk Stratification of Non-Culprit Coronary Narrowings in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15; 120(8):1260-1266.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  24. Coronary artery calcium in breast cancer survivors after radiation therapy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Sep; 33(9):1425-1431.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  25. Radiation Dose Levels of Retrospectively ECG-Gated Coronary CT Angiography Using 70-kVp Tube Voltage in Patients with High or Irregular Heart Rates. Acad Radiol. 2017 01; 24(1):30-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  26. Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Sep-Oct; 10(5):377-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  27. Computed Tomography-Derived Parameters of Myocardial Morphology and Function in Black and White Patients With Acute Chest Pain. Am J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 01; 117(3):333-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  28. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  29. Mammographic detection of breast arterial calcification as an independent predictor of coronary atherosclerotic disease in a single ethnic cohort of African American women. Atherosclerosis. 2015 Sep; 242(1):218-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  30. Development of an Ex Vivo, Beating Heart Model for CT Myocardial Perfusion. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:412716.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  31. Coronary calcium scores are systematically underestimated at a large chest size: A multivendor phantom study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Sep-Oct; 9(5):415-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  32. Hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis by vessel attenuation measurement on CT compared with adenosine perfusion MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jan; 84(1):92-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  33. Correction of lumen contrast-enhancement influence on non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque quantification on CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Feb; 31(2):429-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  34. Closing in on the K edge: coronary CT angiography at 100, 80, and 70 kV-initial comparison of a second- versus a third-generation dual-source CT system. Radiology. 2014 Nov; 273(2):373-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  35. Comparison of the effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection on cardiac CT postprocessing. Acad Radiol. 2014 Mar; 21(3):318-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  36. Quantitative analysis of coronary plaque composition by dual-source CT in patients with acute non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction compared to patients with stable coronary artery disease correlated with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. Acad Radiol. 2013 Aug; 20(8):995-1003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  37. Non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque visualization on CT: effects of contrast-enhancement and lipid-content fractions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jun; 29(5):1137-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  38. Cardiovascular CT angiography in neonates and children: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction with iterative image reconstruction techniques. Eur Radiol. 2013 May; 23(5):1306-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  39. Impact of coronary calcium score on the prevalence of coronary artery stenosis on dual source CT coronary angiography in caucasian patients with an intermediate risk. Acad Radiol. 2012 Nov; 19(11):1316-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  40. Coronary CT angiography versus conventional cardiac angiography for therapeutic decision making in patients with high likelihood of coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2012 Nov; 265(2):385-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  41. CT of coronary heart disease: Part 1, CT of myocardial infarction, ischemia, and viability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar; 198(3):531-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  42. Small calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque simulation model: minimal size and attenuation detectable by 64-MDCT and MicroCT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Apr; 28(4):843-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  43. Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Radiol. 2008 Dec; 18(12):2785-807.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  44. Measurement of coronary calcium scores by electron beam computed tomography or exercise testing as initial diagnostic tool in low-risk patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol. 2008 Feb; 18(2):244-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  45. Quality and safety of coronary computed tomography angiography at academic and non-academic sites: insights from a large European registry (ESCR MR/CT Registry). Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug; 32(8):5246-5255.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  46. FFRCT and QFR: Ready to be used in clinical decision making? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022 Jul-Aug; 16(4):343-344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  47. Early detection of obstructive coronary artery disease in the asymptomatic high-risk population: objectives and study design of the EARLY-SYNERGY trial. Am Heart J. 2022 04; 246:166-177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  48. Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion CT for the Detection of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 01; 15(1):75-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  49. Screening for cardiovascular disease risk using traditional risk factor assessment or coronary artery calcium scoring: the ROBINSCA trial. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 10 20; 21(11):1216-1224.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  50. Assessment of Dynamic Change of Coronary Artery Geometry and Its Relationship to Coronary Artery Disease, Based on Coronary CT Angiography. J Digit Imaging. 2020 04; 33(2):480-489.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  51. Computational quantitative flow ratio to assess functional severity of coronary artery stenosis. Int J Cardiol. 2018 11 15; 271:36-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  52. Prognostic value of CT-derived left atrial and left ventricular measures in patients with acute chest pain. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan; 86:163-168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  53. Absolute Versus Relative Myocardial Blood Flow by Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Anatomic Coronary Artery Disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul; 205(1):W67-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  54. Quantification of coronary artery calcium in nongated CT to predict cardiovascular events in male lung cancer screening participants: results of the NELSON study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Jan-Feb; 9(1):50-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  55. Coronary calcification and the risk of heart failure in the elderly: the Rotterdam Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Sep; 5(9):874-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  56. Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Aug; 24(6):645-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  57. Dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of myocardial ischemia with the use of myocardial tagging. Circulation. 2003 Apr 01; 107(12):1592-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.