Connection

Robert Haile to DNA-Binding Proteins

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Robert Haile has written about DNA-Binding Proteins.
Connection Strength

1.445
  1. XRCC1, XRCC3, and XPD polymorphisms as modifiers of the effect of smoking and alcohol on colorectal adenoma risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Dec; 15(12):2384-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  2. XRCC1 and XRCC3 polymorphisms and their role as effect modifiers of unsaturated fatty acids and antioxidant intake on colorectal adenomas risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Mar; 14(3):609-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  3. Cancer risks by gene, age, and gender in 6350 carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair variants: findings from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Genet Med. 2020 01; 22(1):15-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  4. Risk of colorectal cancer for people with a mutation in both a MUTYH and a DNA mismatch repair gene. Fam Cancer. 2015 Dec; 14(4):575-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  5. Detection of large scale 3' deletions in the PMS2 gene amongst Colon-CFR participants: have we been missing anything? Fam Cancer. 2013 Sep; 12(3):563-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  6. Variants in activators and downstream targets of ATM, radiation exposure, and contralateral breast cancer risk in the WECARE study. Hum Mutat. 2012 Jan; 33(1):158-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  7. Body mass index in early adulthood and endometrial cancer risk for mismatch repair gene mutation carriers. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr; 117(4):899-905.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  8. Prevalence of alterations in DNA mismatch repair genes in patients with young-onset colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jun; 9(6):497-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  9. Radiation exposure, the ATM Gene, and contralateral breast cancer in the women's environmental cancer and radiation epidemiology study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Apr 07; 102(7):475-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  10. Risks of Lynch syndrome cancers for MSH6 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 03; 102(3):193-201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  11. Variants in the ATM gene associated with a reduced risk of contralateral breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 15; 68(16):6486-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  12. Conversion analysis for mutation detection in MLH1 and MSH2 in patients with colorectal cancer. JAMA. 2005 Feb 16; 293(7):799-809.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  13. DNA repair and cancer in colon and rectum: Novel players in genetic susceptibility. Int J Cancer. 2020 01 15; 146(2):363-372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  14. Determining the familial risk distribution of colorectal cancer: a data mining approach. Fam Cancer. 2016 Apr; 15(2):241-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  15. Mutation spectrum and risk of colorectal cancer in African American families with Lynch syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2015 Nov; 149(6):1446-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  16. Aspirin, Ibuprofen, and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Lynch Syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep; 107(9).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  17. Are the common genetic variants associated with colorectal cancer risk for DNA mismatch repair gene mutation carriers? Eur J Cancer. 2013 May; 49(7):1578-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  18. Risks of colorectal and other cancers after endometrial cancer for women with Lynch syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Feb 20; 105(4):274-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  19. Risk of metachronous colon cancer following surgery for rectal cancer in mismatch repair gene mutation carriers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun; 20(6):1829-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  20. Identification of Genetic Susceptibility Loci for Colorectal Tumors in a Genome-Wide Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2013 Apr; 144(4):799-807.e24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  21. A multifactorial likelihood model for MMR gene variant classification incorporating probabilities based on sequence bioinformatics and tumor characteristics: a report from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Hum Mutat. 2013 Jan; 34(1):200-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  22. Risks of primary extracolonic cancers following colorectal cancer in lynch syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Sep 19; 104(18):1363-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  23. Colorectal and other cancer risks for carriers and noncarriers from families with a DNA mismatch repair gene mutation: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 20; 30(9):958-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  24. Metachronous colorectal cancer risk for mismatch repair gene mutation carriers: the advantage of more extensive colon surgery. Gut. 2011 Jul; 60(7):950-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  25. Risk of endometrial cancer for women diagnosed with HNPCC-related colorectal carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2010 Dec 01; 127(11):2678-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  26. Polymorphisms in base excision repair genes as colorectal cancer risk factors and modifiers of the effect of diets high in red meat. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Dec; 19(12):3167-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  27. Variants on 9p24 and 8q24 are associated with risk of colorectal cancer: results from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Cancer Res. 2007 Dec 01; 67(23):11128-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  28. Lower cancer incidence in Amsterdam-I criteria families without mismatch repair deficiency: familial colorectal cancer type X. JAMA. 2005 Apr 27; 293(16):1979-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  29. Study design: evaluating gene-environment interactions in the etiology of breast cancer - the WECARE study. Breast Cancer Res. 2004; 6(3):R199-214.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  30. Designing and implementing quality control for multi-center screening of mutations in the ATM gene among women with breast cancer. Hum Mutat. 2003 May; 21(5):542-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.