Connection

James Scardo to Retrospective Studies

This is a "connection" page, showing publications James Scardo has written about Retrospective Studies.
Connection Strength

0.144
  1. A scoring system for detection of macrosomia and prediction of shoulder dystocia: a disappointment. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006 Nov; 19(11):699-705.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  2. Suspicion of intrauterine growth restriction: Use of abdominal circumference alone or estimated fetal weight below 10%. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006 Sep; 19(9):557-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  3. Sonographic estimate of birth weight among high-risk patients: feasibility and factors influencing accuracy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug; 195(2):601-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  4. Predicting the success of a trial of labor with a simple scoring system. J Reprod Med. 2000 Apr; 45(4):332-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  5. Mode of delivery trends by hospital type: an 18-year comparison of a military hospital with university and community hospitals. Mil Med. 2014 Feb; 179(2):169-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  6. Intrauterine growth restriction and oligohydramnios among high-risk patients. Am J Perinatol. 2007 Apr; 24(4):215-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  7. Absent or reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery: outcome at a community hospital. J Miss State Med Assoc. 2005 Jun; 46(6):163-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  8. Detecting fetal growth restriction or discordant growth in twin gestations stratified by placental chorionicity. J Reprod Med. 2004 Apr; 49(4):279-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  9. Detection of fetal growth restriction in patients with chronic hypertension: is it feasible? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003 Nov; 14(5):324-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  10. Managing nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns before cesarean delivery. Compliance with ACOG recommendations. J Reprod Med. 2000 Dec; 45(12):995-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.