Connection

Robert Harrington to Myocardial Revascularization

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Robert Harrington has written about Myocardial Revascularization.
  1. Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and the Learning Health System: A Good Start. JAMA. 2015 Nov 17; 314(19):2029-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.494
  2. Characterization of myocardial infarction as an end point in two large trials of acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jun 15; 95(12):1404-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.240
  3. Differential treatment benefit of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy for acute coronary syndromes: exploration of methods. Circulation. 2004 Feb 10; 109(5):641-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  4. Advances and continued controversy in coronary revascularization of patients with diabetes mellitus. Curr Diab Rep. 2003 Oct; 3(5):351-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.213
  5. Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020 04 09; 382(15):1395-1407.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  6. Planning and Conducting the ISCHEMIA Trial. Circulation. 2018 10 02; 138(14):1384-1386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  7. International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial: Rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2018 07; 201:124-135.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  8. Discharge timing and outcomes after uncomplicated non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2018 07; 201:103-110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  9. Biomarkers and Coronary Lesions Predict Outcomes after Revascularization in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. Clin Chem. 2017 Feb; 63(2):573-584.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  10. Medical Therapy With Versus Without Revascularization in Stable Patients With Moderate and Severe Ischemia: The Case for Community Equipoise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jan 05; 67(1):81-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  11. Vorapaxar in patients with peripheral artery disease and acute coronary syndrome: insights from Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRACER). Am Heart J. 2014 Oct; 168(4):588-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  12. Biomarkers in relation to the effects of ticagrelor in comparison with clopidogrel in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients managed with or without in-hospital revascularization: a substudy from the Prospective Randomized Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Circulation. 2014 Jan 21; 129(3):293-303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  13. Outcomes of second revascularization procedures after stent implantation. J Med Syst. 2008 Apr; 32(2):177-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  14. Utilization of early invasive management strategies for high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative. JAMA. 2004 Nov 03; 292(17):2096-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  15. Effect of revascularization on mortality associated with an elevated white blood cell count in acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2003 Jul 15; 92(2):136-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  16. Effect of age on efficacy and safety of vorapaxar in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: Insights from the Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRACER) trial. Am Heart J. 2016 08; 178:176-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  17. The effect of cangrelor and access site on ischaemic and bleeding events: insights from CHAMPION PHOENIX. Eur Heart J. 2016 Apr 07; 37(14):1122-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  18. Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome with or without revascularization: results from the PLATO trial. Eur Heart J. 2014 Aug 14; 35(31):2083-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  19. Effect of cangrelor on periprocedural outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions: a pooled analysis of patient-level data. Lancet. 2013 Dec 14; 382(9909):1981-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  20. Edifoligide and long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting: PRoject of Ex-vivo Vein graft ENgineering via Transfection IV (PREVENT IV) 5-year results. Am Heart J. 2012 Sep; 164(3):379-386.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  21. Antithrombotics in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 08; 54(11):969-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  22. Prior polyvascular disease: risk factor for adverse ischaemic outcomes in acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2009 May; 30(10):1195-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  23. Recent trends in the care of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the CRUSADE initiative. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Oct 09; 166(18):2027-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  24. Low-molecular-weight heparin compared with unfractionated heparin for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: results from the CRUSADE initiative. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2006 Jun; 21(3):211-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  25. Relation of early saphenous vein graft failure to outcomes following coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2005 Nov 01; 96(9):1254-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  26. Prognostic importance of new small Q waves following non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Am J Med. 2003 Dec 01; 115(8):613-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  27. Promise of combined low-molecular-weight heparin and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition: results from Platelet IIb/IIIa Antagonist for the Reduction of Acute coronary syndrome events in a Global Organization Network B (PARAGON B). Am Heart J. 2002 Dec; 144(6):995-1002.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.