Connection

Carlo De Cecco to Risk Assessment

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Carlo De Cecco has written about Risk Assessment.
Connection Strength

0.548
  1. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Machine Learning for Risk Stratification of Non-Culprit Coronary Narrowings in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15; 120(8):1260-1266.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  2. Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT imaging: Prognostic value. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Jan - Feb; 11(1):16-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  3. Discordance Between Coronary Artery Calcium Area and Density Predicts Long-Term Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Nov; 15(11):1929-1940.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  4. Evolving Role of Calcium Density in Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring and?Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 09; 15(9):1648-1662.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  5. Ischemia and outcome prediction by cardiac CT based machine learning. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec; 36(12):2429-2439.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  6. Relationship Between Pregnancy Complications and Subsequent Coronary Artery Disease Assessed by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Black Women. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 07; 12(7):e008754.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  7. Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 May - Jun; 13(3):26-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  8. Progression of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and relationship with adverse cardiovascular event in asymptomatic diabetic patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 02 11; 19(1):39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  9. Current and future applications of CT coronary calcium assessment. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Jun; 16(6):441-453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  10. High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction. Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul; 28(7):3097-3104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  11. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep - Oct; 11(5):354-359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  12. Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Angiography. Radiology. 2017 Dec; 285(3):941-952.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  13. Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Sep-Oct; 10(5):377-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  14. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging identifies early perfusion abnormalities in diabetes and hypertension: Insights from a multicenter registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug; 10(4):301-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  15. Prognostic value of epicardial fat volume measurements by computed tomography: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Radiol. 2015 Nov; 25(11):3372-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  16. Radiation risks from cardiovascular imaging tests. Circulation. 2014 Jul 29; 130(5):442-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  17. Reconstruction of the superior vena cava by biologic conduit: assessment of long-term patency by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep; 96(3):1039-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  18. Preoperative coronary risk assessment with dual-source CT in patients undergoing noncoronary cardiac surgery. Radiol Med. 2010 Oct; 115(7):1028-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.