Connection

Carlo De Cecco to Coronary Stenosis

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Carlo De Cecco has written about Coronary Stenosis.
Carlo De Cecco
Connection Strength
4.582
Coronary Stenosis
  1. Artificial intelligence machine learning-based coronary CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFRML): Impact of iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Nov - Dec; 13(6):331-335.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.515
  2. Diagnostic accuracy of low and high tube voltage coronary CT angiography using an X-ray tube potential-tailored contrast medium injection protocol. Eur Radiol. 2018 May; 28(5):2134-2142.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.484
  3. Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT imaging: Prognostic value. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Jan - Feb; 11(1):16-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.454
  4. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct; 85(10):1893-1899.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  5. Beyond stenosis detection: computed tomography approaches for determining the functional relevance of coronary artery disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Mar; 53(2):317-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.395
  6. Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT: feasibility in a multicenter patient population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug; 203(2):W174-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.379
  7. Artificial intelligence in cardiac radiology. Radiol Med. 2020 Nov; 125(11):1186-1199.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  8. Gender differences in the diagnostic performance of machine learning coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve -results from the MACHINE registry. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Oct; 119:108657.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  9. Impact of Coronary Computerized Tomography Angiography-Derived Plaque Quantification and Machine-Learning Computerized Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve on Adverse Cardiac Outcome. Am J Cardiol. 2019 11 01; 124(9):1340-1348.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  10. Coronary CT angiography-derived plaque quantification with artificial intelligence CT fractional flow reserve for the identification of lesion-specific ischemia. Eur Radiol. 2019 May; 29(5):2378-2387.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  11. Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Machine Learning Algorithm versus Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling. Radiology. 2018 Jul; 288(1):64-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  12. Noninvasive Derivation of Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Review. J Thorac Imaging. 2018 Mar; 33(2):88-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  13. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Therapeutic Decision Making. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15; 120(12):2121-2127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  14. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Machine Learning for Risk Stratification of Non-Culprit Coronary Narrowings in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15; 120(8):1260-1266.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  15. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Plaque Quantification in Patients With Acute Coronary?Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2017 03 01; 119(5):712-718.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  16. Correlation and predictive value of aortic root calcification markers with coronary artery calcification and obstructive coronary artery disease. Radiol Med. 2017 Feb; 122(2):113-120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  17. Prognostic implications of coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Nov - Dec; 10(6):458-465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  18. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 May-Jun; 10(3):199-206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  19. Diagnostic value of quantitative stenosis predictors with coronary CT angiography compared to invasive fractional flow reserve. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Aug; 84(8):1509-1515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  20. Technical prerequisites and imaging protocols for dynamic and dual energy myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Dec; 84(12):2401-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  21. Residents' performance in the interpretation of on-call "triple-rule-out" CT studies in patients with acute chest pain. Acad Radiol. 2014 Jul; 21(7):938-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  22. Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: From Anatomy to Prognosis. Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:6649410.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  23. Differences in coronary vasodilatory capacity and atherosclerosis in endurance athletes using coronary CTA and computational fluid dynamics (CFD): Comparison with a sedentary lifestyle. Eur J Radiol. 2020 Sep; 130:109168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  24. Rationale and design of the quantification of myocardial blood flow using dynamic PET/CTA-fused imagery (DEMYSTIFY) to determine physiological significance of specific coronary lesions. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 06; 27(3):1030-1039.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  25. Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve. Radiology. 2017 10; 285(1):17-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.