Connection

Carlo De Cecco to Coronary Angiography

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Carlo De Cecco has written about Coronary Angiography.
Carlo De Cecco
Connection Strength
11.522
Coronary Angiography
  1. Artificial intelligence machine learning-based coronary CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFRML): Impact of iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Nov - Dec; 13(6):331-335.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.431
  2. Contrast media injection protocol optimization for dual-energy coronary CT angiography: results from a circulation phantom. Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug; 28(8):3473-3481.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.412
  3. Beam-hardening in 70-kV Coronary CT angiography: Artifact reduction using an advanced post-processing algorithm. Eur J Radiol. 2018 Apr; 101:111-117.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.411
  4. Diagnostic accuracy of low and high tube voltage coronary CT angiography using an X-ray tube potential-tailored contrast medium injection protocol. Eur Radiol. 2018 May; 28(5):2134-2142.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.404
  5. Prognostic Value of Stress Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion CT in a Multicenter Population With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Apr; 208(4):761-769.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.383
  6. Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT imaging: Prognostic value. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Jan - Feb; 11(1):16-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.380
  7. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using 3rd-generation dual-source CT and automated tube voltage selection: Clinical application in a non-obese and obese patient population. Eur Radiol. 2017 Jun; 27(6):2298-2308.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.373
  8. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct; 85(10):1893-1899.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.369
  9. Automated tube voltage selection for radiation dose and contrast medium reduction at coronary CT angiography using 3(rd) generation dual-source CT. Eur Radiol. 2016 Oct; 26(10):3608-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.357
  10. Coronary CT angiography in obese patients using 3(rd) generation dual-source CT: effect of body mass index on image quality. Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep; 26(9):2937-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.354
  11. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.350
  12. Technical prerequisites and imaging protocols for dynamic and dual energy myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Dec; 84(12):2401-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.334
  13. Incremental value of pharmacological stress cardiac dual-energy CT over coronary CT angiography alone for the assessment of coronary artery disease in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jul; 203(1):W70-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.319
  14. Image quality and radiation dose of low tube voltage 3rd generation dual-source coronary CT angiography in obese patients: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jul; 24(7):1643-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.316
  15. Coronary artery computed tomography scanning. Circulation. 2014 Mar 25; 129(12):1341-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.313
  16. Dual source CT: state of the art in the depiction of coronary arteries anatomy, anatomical variants and myocardial segments. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2012 Apr; 60(2):133-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.273
  17. The importance of age, sex, and body surface area in cardiovascular dimensions analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Nov; 197(5):W966; author reply W967.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.266
  18. Dual-source CT coronary angiography: prospective versus retrospective acquisition technique. Radiol Med. 2011 Mar; 116(2):178-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  19. Global cardiac evaluation without heart rate control: preliminary experience with dual source CT (DSCT). Minerva Cardioangiol. 2008 Dec; 56(6):587-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.217
  20. Evaluation of a Tube Voltage-Tailored Contrast Medium Injection Protocol for Coronary CT Angiography: Results From the Prospective VOLCANIC Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 11; 215(5):1049-1056.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  21. Differences in coronary vasodilatory capacity and atherosclerosis in endurance athletes using coronary CTA and computational fluid dynamics (CFD): Comparison with a sedentary lifestyle. Eur J Radiol. 2020 Sep; 130:109168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  22. Ischemia and outcome prediction by cardiac CT based machine learning. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec; 36(12):2429-2439.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  23. In-Hospital Cost Comparison of Triple-Rule-Out Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Acute Chest Pain. J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May; 35(3):198-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  24. Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence Deep Learning Algorithm Implementing a Recurrent Neural Network With Long Short-term Memory for the Automated Detection of Calcified Plaques From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May; 35 Suppl 1:S49-S57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  25. Machine Learning and Deep Neural Networks Applications in Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Perfusion. J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May; 35 Suppl 1:S58-S65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  26. Performance of a deep learning algorithm for the evaluation of CAD-RADS classification with CCTA. Atherosclerosis. 2020 02; 294:25-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  27. Influence of Coronary Calcium on Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning CT-FFR: Results From MACHINE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 03; 13(3):760-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  28. Impact of Coronary Computerized Tomography Angiography-Derived Plaque Quantification and Machine-Learning Computerized Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve on Adverse Cardiac Outcome. Am J Cardiol. 2019 11 01; 124(9):1340-1348.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  29. Relationship Between Pregnancy Complications and Subsequent Coronary Artery Disease Assessed by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Black Women. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 07; 12(7):e008754.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  30. Advanced atherosclerosis imaging by CT: Radiomics, machine learning and deep learning. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Sep - Oct; 13(5):274-280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  31. Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 May - Jun; 13(3):26-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  32. Progression of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and relationship with adverse cardiovascular event in asymptomatic diabetic patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 02 11; 19(1):39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  33. Coronary CT angiography-derived plaque quantification with artificial intelligence CT fractional flow reserve for the identification of lesion-specific ischemia. Eur Radiol. 2019 May; 29(5):2378-2387.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  34. Intermodel disagreement of myocardial blood flow estimation from dynamic CT perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jan; 110:175-180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  35. Machine learning in cardiac CT: Basic concepts and contemporary data. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 May - Jun; 12(3):192-201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  36. Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Machine Learning Algorithm versus Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling. Radiology. 2018 Jul; 288(1):64-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  37. Noninvasive Derivation of Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Review. J Thorac Imaging. 2018 Mar; 33(2):88-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  38. High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction. Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul; 28(7):3097-3104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  39. Heavily Calcified Coronary Arteries: Advanced Calcium Subtraction Improves Luminal Visualization and Diagnostic Confidence in Dual-Energy Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. Invest Radiol. 2018 02; 53(2):103-109.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  40. Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve. Radiology. 2017 10; 285(1):17-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  41. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Therapeutic Decision Making. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15; 120(12):2121-2127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  42. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Machine Learning for Risk Stratification of Non-Culprit Coronary Narrowings in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15; 120(8):1260-1266.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  43. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep - Oct; 11(5):354-359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  44. CT angiography to evaluate coronary artery disease and revascularization requirement before trans-catheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep - Oct; 11(5):338-346.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  45. CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration using iterative beam-hardening calcium correction reconstruction. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jun; 91:29-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  46. CT myocardial perfusion: state of the science. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2017 Jun; 65(3):252-264.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  47. Cardiac CTA for Evaluation of Prosthetic?Valve?Dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 01; 10(1):91-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  48. Correlation and predictive value of aortic root calcification markers with coronary artery calcification and obstructive coronary artery disease. Radiol Med. 2017 Feb; 122(2):113-120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  49. Prognostic implications of coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Nov - Dec; 10(6):458-465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  50. Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Sep-Oct; 10(5):377-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  51. Myocardial perfusion imaging with dual energy CT. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct; 85(10):1914-1921.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  52. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging identifies early perfusion abnormalities in diabetes and hypertension: Insights from a multicenter registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug; 10(4):301-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  53. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 May-Jun; 10(3):199-206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  54. Semiautomated Global Quantification of Left Ventricular Myocardial Perfusion at Stress Dynamic CT:: Diagnostic Accuracy for Detection of Territorial Myocardial Perfusion Deficits Compared to Visual Assessment. Acad Radiol. 2016 Apr; 23(4):429-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  55. Mammographic detection of breast arterial calcification as an independent predictor of coronary atherosclerotic disease in a single ethnic cohort of African American women. Atherosclerosis. 2015 Sep; 242(1):218-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  56. Absolute Versus Relative Myocardial Blood Flow by Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Anatomic Coronary Artery Disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul; 205(1):W67-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  57. Diagnostic value of quantitative stenosis predictors with coronary CT angiography compared to invasive fractional flow reserve. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Aug; 84(8):1509-1515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  58. Influence of technical parameters on epicardial fat volume quantification at cardiac CT. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jun; 84(6):1062-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  59. Coronary computed tomographic angiography in clinical practice: state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Mar; 53(2):287-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  60. High-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp with low contrast medium volume: comparison of 80 and 100 kVp high-pitch protocols. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Nov; 93(22):e92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  61. Cardiac CT for myocardial ischaemia detection and characterization--comparative analysis. Br J Radiol. 2014 Nov; 87(1043):20140159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  62. Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT: feasibility in a multicenter patient population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug; 203(2):W174-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  63. Feasibility of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography with 30 mL iodinated contrast agent at 70 kVp: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jul; 24(7):1537-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  64. Reproducibility of noncalcified coronary artery plaque burden quantification from coronary CT angiography across different image analysis platforms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jan; 202(1):W43-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  65. Automated quantification of epicardial adipose tissue using CT angiography: evaluation of a prototype software. Eur Radiol. 2014 Feb; 24(2):519-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  66. Assessment of left ventricular parameters in orthotopic heart transplant recipients using dual-source CT and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: comparison with MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov; 81(11):3282-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  67. Preoperative coronary risk assessment with dual-source CT in patients undergoing noncoronary cardiac surgery. Radiol Med. 2010 Oct; 115(7):1028-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  68. Dual-source CT for visualization of the coronary arteries in heart transplant patients with high heart rates. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug; 191(2):448-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  69. Dual-source CT coronary imaging in heart transplant recipients: image quality and optimal reconstruction interval. Eur Radiol. 2008 Sep; 18(9):1791-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  70. The Feasibility, Tolerability, Safety, and Accuracy of Low-radiation Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Regadenoson Compared With Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography. J Thorac Imaging. 2021 Nov 01; 36(6):345-352.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  71. The Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography: 2020 Year in review. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021 Mar-Apr; 15(2):180-189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  72. The Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography year in review - 2019. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Mar - Apr; 14(2):107-117.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  73. Gender differences in the diagnostic performance of machine learning coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve -results from the MACHINE registry. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Oct; 119:108657.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  74. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Plaque Quantification in Patients With Acute Coronary?Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2017 03 01; 119(5):712-718.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  75. CT angiography for planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement using automated tube voltage selection: Image quality and radiation exposure. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan; 86:276-283.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  76. Dual-source CT imaging to plan transcatheter aortic valve replacement: accuracy for diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2015 Apr; 275(1):80-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  77. Dual-source CT in heart transplant recipients: quantification of global left ventricular function and mass. J Thorac Imaging. 2009 May; 24(2):103-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  78. Incidental dual source computed tomography imaging of ductal aortic coarctation, left subclavian artery stenosis and bicuspid aortic valve in a patient admitted for atypical chest pain. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008 May; 7(3):504-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.