Connection

Carlo De Cecco to Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Carlo De Cecco has written about Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted.
  1. Artificial intelligence machine learning-based coronary CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFRML): Impact of iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Nov - Dec; 13(6):331-335.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.520
  2. Virtual unenhanced imaging of the liver with third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT and advanced modeled iterative reconstruction. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jul; 85(7):1257-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.437
  3. Coronary CT angiography in obese patients using 3(rd) generation dual-source CT: effect of body mass index on image quality. Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep; 26(9):2937-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.427
  4. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.423
  5. Physician preference between low-dose computed tomography with a sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm and routine-dose computed tomography with filtered back projection in abdominopelvic imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013 Nov-Dec; 37(6):932-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.368
  6. Dual-energy CT: oncologic applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov; 199(5 Suppl):S98-S105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.343
  7. Ischemia and outcome prediction by cardiac CT based machine learning. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec; 36(12):2429-2439.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  8. Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence Deep Learning Algorithm Implementing a Recurrent Neural Network With Long Short-term Memory for the Automated Detection of Calcified Plaques From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May; 35 Suppl 1:S49-S57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  9. Machine Learning and Deep Neural Networks Applications in Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Perfusion. J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May; 35 Suppl 1:S58-S65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  10. Influence of Coronary Calcium on Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning CT-FFR: Results From MACHINE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 03; 13(3):760-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  11. Advanced atherosclerosis imaging by CT: Radiomics, machine learning and deep learning. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Sep - Oct; 13(5):274-280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  12. Machine learning in cardiac CT: Basic concepts and contemporary data. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 May - Jun; 12(3):192-201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  13. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep - Oct; 11(5):354-359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  14. Cinematic Rendering in CT: A Novel, Lifelike 3D Visualization Technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Aug; 209(2):370-379.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  15. Monoenergetic Dual-energy Computed Tomographic Imaging: Cardiothoracic Applications. J Thorac Imaging. 2017 May; 32(3):151-158.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  16. CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration using iterative beam-hardening calcium correction reconstruction. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jun; 91:29-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  17. Optimization of window settings for standard and advanced virtual monoenergetic imaging in abdominal dual-energy CT angiography. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 03; 42(3):772-780.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  18. State-of-the-Art Pulmonary CT Angiography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar; 208(3):495-504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  19. Automated tube voltage selection for radiation dose and contrast medium reduction at coronary CT angiography using 3(rd) generation dual-source CT. Eur Radiol. 2016 Oct; 26(10):3608-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  20. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Angiography of the Lower Extremity Runoff: Impact of Noise-Optimized Virtual Monochromatic Imaging on Image Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy. Invest Radiol. 2016 Feb; 51(2):139-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  21. Quantitative evaluation of beam-hardening artefact correction in dual-energy CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep; 26(9):3215-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  22. Reduced radiation dose and improved image quality at cardiovascular CT angiography by automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection: intra-individual comparison. Eur Radiol. 2014 Nov; 24(11):2677-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  23. Incremental value of pharmacological stress cardiac dual-energy CT over coronary CT angiography alone for the assessment of coronary artery disease in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jul; 203(1):W70-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  24. Feasibility of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography with 30 mL iodinated contrast agent at 70 kVp: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jul; 24(7):1537-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  25. Monoenergetic extrapolation of cardiac dual energy CT for artifact reduction. Acta Radiol. 2015 Apr; 56(4):413-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  26. Automated quantification of epicardial adipose tissue using CT angiography: evaluation of a prototype software. Eur Radiol. 2014 Feb; 24(2):519-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  27. Dual-source CT coronary angiography: prospective versus retrospective acquisition technique. Radiol Med. 2011 Mar; 116(2):178-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  28. Dual-source CT in heart transplant recipients: quantification of global left ventricular function and mass. J Thorac Imaging. 2009 May; 24(2):103-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  29. Review of Clinical Applications for Virtual Monoenergetic Dual-Energy CT. Radiology. 2019 11; 293(2):260-271.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  30. Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 May - Jun; 13(3):26-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  31. High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction. Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul; 28(7):3097-3104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  32. Iterative reconstruction improves detection of in-stent restenosis by high-pitch dual-source coronary CT angiography. Sci Rep. 2017 07 31; 7(1):6956.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  33. Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT?Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 10; 10(10 Pt A):1116-1124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  34. CT angiography for planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement using automated tube voltage selection: Image quality and radiation exposure. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan; 86:276-283.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  35. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 May-Jun; 10(3):199-206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  36. A noise-optimized virtual monochromatic reconstruction algorithm improves stent visualization and diagnostic accuracy for detection of in-stent re-stenosis in lower extremity run-off CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec; 26(12):4380-4389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  37. Effect of automated tube voltage selection, integrated circuit detector and advanced iterative reconstruction on radiation dose and image quality of 3rd generation dual-source aortic CT angiography: An intra-individual comparison. Eur J Radiol. 2016 May; 85(5):972-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  38. Image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy of 70 kVp whole brain volumetric CT perfusion imaging: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol. 2016 Nov; 26(11):4184-4193.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  39. MDCT classification of steatotic liver: a multicentric analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Mar; 27(3):290-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  40. Dual-source CT imaging to plan transcatheter aortic valve replacement: accuracy for diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2015 Apr; 275(1):80-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  41. Reproducibility of noncalcified coronary artery plaque burden quantification from coronary CT angiography across different image analysis platforms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jan; 202(1):W43-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  42. First-arterial-pass dual-energy CT for assessment of myocardial blood supply: do we need rest, stress, and delayed acquisition? Comparison with SPECT. Radiology. 2014 Mar; 270(3):708-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  43. The optimal contrast media policy in CT of the liver. Part I: Technical notes. Acta Radiol. 2011 Jun 01; 52(5):467-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  44. Sixty-four-multidetector-row computed tomography angiography with bolus tracking to time arterial-phase imaging in healthy liver: is there a correlation between quantitative and qualitative scores? J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010 Nov-Dec; 34(6):883-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  45. Dual-source CT for visualization of the coronary arteries in heart transplant patients with high heart rates. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug; 191(2):448-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.