Connection

Craig Velozo to Activities of Daily Living

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Craig Velozo has written about Activities of Daily Living.
Connection Strength

3.995
  1. Linking existing instruments to develop a continuum of care measure: accuracy comparison using function-related group classification. Qual Life Res. 2017 Sep; 26(9):2563-2572.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.499
  2. Equating activities of daily living outcome measures: the Functional Independence Measure and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index. Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jan; 40(2):217-224.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.484
  3. Linking Existing Instruments to Develop an Activity of Daily Living Item Bank. Eval Health Prof. 2018 03; 41(1):25-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.481
  4. Item-Level Psychometrics of the Glasgow Outcome Scale: Extended Structured Interviews. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2016 04; 36(2):65-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.458
  5. Validation of FIM-MDS crosswalk conversion algorithm. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008; 45(7):1065-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.260
  6. Rasch analysis of Minimum Data Set mandated in skilled nursing facilities. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008; 45(9):1385-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.260
  7. Translating measures across the continuum of care: using Rasch analysis to create a crosswalk between the Functional Independence Measure and the Minimum Data Set. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007; 44(3):467-78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.243
  8. Concomitant sensory stimulation during therapy to enhance hand functional recovery post stroke. Trials. 2022 Apr 05; 23(1):262.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  9. The use of Rasch analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. Am J Occup Ther. 1999 Jan-Feb; 53(1):83-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  10. Generating Rasch-based activity of daily living measures from the Spinal Cord Injury Longitudinal Aging Study. Spinal Cord. 2018 01; 56(1):14-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  11. FIM-Minimum Data Set Motor Item Bank: Short Forms Development and Precision Comparison in Veterans. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 03; 99(3):534-541.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  12. The Safety Assessment Measure for persons with traumatic brain injury: Item pool development and content validity. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 30; 39(3):371-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  13. Assessment of the psychometrics of a PROMIS item bank: self-efficacy for managing daily activities. Qual Life Res. 2016 09; 25(9):2221-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  14. Functional scale discrimination at admission and discharge: Rasch analysis of the Level of Rehabilitation Scale-III. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Aug; 76(8):705-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  15. Using the assessment of motor and process skills to compare occupational performance between clinic and home settings. Am J Occup Ther. 1994 Aug; 48(8):697-709.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  16. Generating clinical outputs for self-reports of visual functioning. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Aug; 90(8):765-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  17. Development of an item bank for a computerised adaptive test of upper-extremity function. Disabil Rehabil. 2011; 33(21-22):2092-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  18. A comparison of the separation ratio and coefficient alpha in the creation of minimum item sets. Med Care. 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I17-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  19. Interrater reliability of the Neuromuscular Recovery Scale for spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug; 96(8):1397-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  20. Cross-cultural assessment of process skills. Am J Occup Ther. 1992 Oct; 46(10):876-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  21. Measurement of social participation outcomes in rehabilitation of veterans with traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012; 49(1):139-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.