Connection

Dag Pavic to Mammography

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Dag Pavic has written about Mammography.
Connection Strength

1.866
  1. Comparison of three methods to increase knowledge about breast cancer and breast cancer screening in screening mammography patients. Acad Radiol. 2007 May; 14(5):553-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.244
  2. Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2006 Nov; 13(11):1317-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.236
  3. Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys. Acad Radiol. 2004 May; 11(5):536-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.198
  4. Effectiveness of a Mobile Mammography Program. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Dec; 209(6):1426-1429.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  5. Changes in Breast Density Reporting Patterns of Radiologists After Publication of the 5th Edition BI-RADS Guidelines: A Single Institution Experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct; 209(4):943-948.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  6. Effects of Changes in BI-RADS Density Assessment Guidelines (Fourth Versus Fifth Edition) on Breast Density Assessment: Intra- and Interreader Agreements and Density Distribution. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Dec; 207(6):1366-1371.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  7. Assessing the Relationship of Mammographic Breast Density and Proliferative Breast Disease. Breast J. 2016 Sep; 22(5):541-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  8. Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2015 Nov 16; 15(4):64-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  9. Comparison of image acquisition and radiologist interpretation times in a diagnostic mammography center. Acad Radiol. 2010 Sep; 17(9):1168-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  10. Cancer cases from ACRIN digital mammographic imaging screening trial: radiologist analysis with use of a logistic regression model. Radiology. 2009 Aug; 252(2):348-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  11. Radiologist evaluation of an X-ray tube-based diffraction-enhanced imaging prototype using full-thickness breast specimens. Acad Radiol. 2009 Nov; 16(11):1329-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  12. Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomas. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1211-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  13. The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic population. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1229-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  14. A comparative study of mobile electronic data entry systems for clinical trials data collection. Int J Med Inform. 2006 Oct-Nov; 75(10-11):722-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  15. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms. Med Phys. 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  16. The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance. Acad Radiol. 2005 May; 12(5):585-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  17. Future directions in breast imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 10; 23(8):1674-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  18. Ultrasound in the management of breast disease. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2003 Apr; 3(2):156-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.