Connection

Dag Pavic to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Dag Pavic has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.123
  1. Comparison of three methods to increase knowledge about breast cancer and breast cancer screening in screening mammography patients. Acad Radiol. 2007 May; 14(5):553-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  2. Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2006 Nov; 13(11):1317-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  3. A comparative study of mobile electronic data entry systems for clinical trials data collection. Int J Med Inform. 2006 Oct-Nov; 75(10-11):722-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  4. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and management of breast cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Dec; 3(6):527-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  5. Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys. Acad Radiol. 2004 May; 11(5):536-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  6. Ultrasound in the management of breast disease. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2003 Apr; 3(2):156-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  7. Tele-3-dimensional computer-assisted functional endoscopic sinus surgery: new dimension in the surgery of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Dec; 127(6):549-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  8. Effectiveness of a Mobile Mammography Program. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Dec; 209(6):1426-1429.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  9. Changes in Breast Density Reporting Patterns of Radiologists After Publication of the 5th Edition BI-RADS Guidelines: A Single Institution Experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct; 209(4):943-948.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  10. Effects of Changes in BI-RADS Density Assessment Guidelines (Fourth Versus Fifth Edition) on Breast Density Assessment: Intra- and Interreader Agreements and Density Distribution. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Dec; 207(6):1366-1371.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  11. Assessing the Relationship of Mammographic Breast Density and Proliferative Breast Disease. Breast J. 2016 Sep; 22(5):541-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  12. Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2015 Nov 16; 15(4):64-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  13. Local control following single-dose intraoperative radiotherapy prior to surgical excision of early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Apr; 18(4):939-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  14. Cosmetic outcomes for accelerated partial breast irradiation before surgical excision of early-stage breast cancer using single-dose intraoperative radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Feb 01; 79(2):400-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  15. Cancer cases from ACRIN digital mammographic imaging screening trial: radiologist analysis with use of a logistic regression model. Radiology. 2009 Aug; 252(2):348-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  16. Radiologist evaluation of an X-ray tube-based diffraction-enhanced imaging prototype using full-thickness breast specimens. Acad Radiol. 2009 Nov; 16(11):1329-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  17. Feasibility of breast preserving therapy with single fraction in situ radiotherapy delivered intraoperatively. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb; 14(2):660-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  18. Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomas. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1211-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  19. The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic population. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1229-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  20. The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance. Acad Radiol. 2005 May; 12(5):585-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  21. Future directions in breast imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 10; 23(8):1674-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.